In need to find something?
Custom Search
Related Posts with Thumbnails

Sunday, January 31, 2010

The Cult of Ibrahim Ali

Technorati tags: , , , ,

Otherwise known as Perkasa – or Perkosa, as Aisehman thinks they should be called.

Well, a couple of days ago, they had the official launch of the Selangor chapter (via The Malaysian Insider), officiated by none other than Dr. M himself.

What was not reported by the media is that they also launched their kick-ass theme song…

The Cult of Ibrahim Ali

If you’d like to sing along, the lyrics, in its full-color glory can be found in the full post...
(rock-along for racism, in the full post)

The Cult of Ibrahim Ali

Look into my eyes, what do you see?
Cult of Personality Ibrahim Ali
I know your anger, I know your dreams
I've been everything you want to be
I'm the Cult of Personality Ibrahim Ali

Like Mussolini and but not Kennedy
I'm the Cult of Personality Ibrahim Ali
Cult of Personality Ibrahim Ali
Cult of Personality Ibrahim Ali

Neon lights, A Nobel 4D Price
The mirror speaks, the reflection lies
You don't know that you have to follow me
Only you I can set me you free

I sell the things you need to be
I'm the smiling snarling face on your T.V.
I'm the Cult of Personality Ibrahim Ali

I exploit you still you love me
I tell you one and one makes three
I'm the Cult of Personality Ibrahim Ali

Like Joseph Stalin and but not Gandhi
I'm the Cult of Personality Ibrahim Ali
Cult of Personality Ibrahim Ali
Cult of Personality Ibrahim Ali

Neon lights a Nobel 4D Prize
A leader liberal speaks, that leader liberal dies fries
You don't know you have to follow me
Only you I can set you free

You gave me fortune
You gave me fame
You give me power in God's name
I'm every person you need to be
I'm the Cult of Personality Ibrahim Ali
(original lyrics by Living Colour, can be found here)

 Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Connecting The Dots

Technorati tags: , , ,

Image taken from EthanHam.com, hosting by PhotobucketWhen Walski was a wee lad, and just starting to learn how to count, one of the fun things he remembers doing was to play Connect-The-Dots. He's quite sure that you know the drawing activity Walski's talking about, right?

What he found fascinating was that the resulting image was often not at all what he expected when he started from the first dot. Of course, Walski doesn’t find them quite as fascinating any more – this is talking about when he was 2 or 3 years old, after all.

But it so happens that in real life, there are virtual dots that, when connected, form interesting mental pictures, too. These dots come in the form of events and sometimes organizations or people. And the resulting pictures snapshots of the reality around us.

The difference is that the images you find in real life, which in fact are hiding in plain sight, often times are more difficult to form. Among the reasons for this is that you don’t always know immediately what dots belong to which picture. Until it is formed in totality.

Now, if you’ve read this far, and think that Walski’s lost his marbles, or worse, is writing about kiddie activity books, now is probably a good time to tell you that there is a point to all this.

It all began one fine day with a question, and a hunch.
(unraveling the imaginary dots, and more, in the full post)

The perplexing question Walski had was this: how is it that all these Malay/Muslim rights NGOs have appeared out of nowhere? Ok, he’s not talking about the more established ones like ABIM, Pekida, PGSM or Perkasa. No, it’s the other ones that seem to suddenly appear, like mushrooms on a moist and fertile dung-filled field, whenever there is an issue pertaining to things Malay/Islam – real or perceived.

Why ask this question? Well, if you’ve ever had to deal with the Malaysian Registrar of Societies (ROS), you’ll know that it’s not that easy to form an association, much less an NGO.

And then there’s the fact that certain religious organizations, which by their very nature, don’t auger well for nation building, are tolerated and to some degree encouraged by the government. One that comes to mind almost immediately is Hizbut Tahrir Malaysia, part of the larger international Hizb ut-Tahrir, one of whose aims is to one day form a global Islamic state. The sovereignty of Malaysia, as it stands today, probably doesn’t fit into the grand scheme of all things Hizb ut.

In fact, so tolerated is this organization that they have been given a KDN publication number, or permit to publish its newsletters, sometime around September 2009 thereabouts. Issuance of these numbers comes under the purview of the Home Ministry, and according to Wikipedia, under the “absolute discretion” of the Home Affairs Minister.

Incidentally, the ROS also comes under the Ministry of Home Affairs. Coincidence? Hold that thought for a moment, because there are more virtual dots to connect.

The hunch that Walski had? Remember the Third Power Column mentioned in a previous post (on November 18, 2009)? Well, information has surfaced that puts the Third Power Column into perspective of the bigger picture.

About 2 weeks ago, a confidential e-mail purportedly from Mahaguru58, pro-tem head of the Muslim Bloggers Alliance (MBA), was disclosed in a blog called Perisik Rakyat®, by blogger Tulang Besi, who was kicked out of the alliance because he disagreed with the unpermissability for non-Muslims to use the word “Allah”. This same posting was published at Malaysia Today, which is how Walski initially got to know about it.

What the e-mail, dated February 14, 2009, reveals is quite interesting. The following is an excerpt (emphasis by myAsylum):

Assalamualaikum dear MBA members.

I was invited to a closed door meeting with Datuk Seri Dr. Hj. Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, Minister in the Prime Minister's Department and in charge of Islamic Affairs, Government of Malaysia day before yesterday at the Shangrila Putrajaya. The meeting took place at 9pm at a designated meeting hall in the exclusive hotel.

The invitation to me was relayed by Rocky Bru @ Ahiruddin Atan, President of All Blogs to discuss amongst many other topics, the problem being created by the publishers of the Malaysian Roman Catholic Magazine 'Herald' who remain obstinate in using the term 'Allah' to represent their idea of God in their Malay section of their Christian magazine.

Fellow blogger Nuraina Samad who blogs at http://nursamad.blogspot.com, the daughter of National Laureate, Allahyarham Tan Sri Samad Ismail, was also there and two other bloggers who wish to remain anonymous.

Also attending on behalf of the Malaysian Government's side was Dato' Hj Wan Mohamad bin Dato' Sheikh Abd.Aziz, the Director General of JAKIM, the Islamic Development Department of Malaysia, Dato' Hj Ibrahim bin Lembut, the Director General and Chief Syarie Judge of the Syariah Justice Department of Malaysia, Datuk Dr. Syed Ali Tawfik Al Attas, the Director General of IKIM, the Institute of Islamic Understanding Malaysia and other top officials of the Ministry (Islamic Affairs, Prime Minister's Department).

(source: Perisik Rakyat®)

There is, therefore, very good reason why Mahaguru58 asked, later in the e-mail, to keep the communiqué under wraps. It also explains why recent statements from Ikim and Jakim on the A-word issue have consistently slanted a certain way.

Assuming that what the e-mail reveals is true, there is, therefore a collusion between members of the government executive, government agencies, the Syariah judiciary, and Malay/Muslim NGOs – all now associated with the Third Power Column, a nebulous entity that Walski has had a hunch existed. It’s aim? To promote religious conservatism with the end-game objective of turning Malaysia into a different kind of nation than what our founding fathers intended in 1957.

More dots that contribute to the bigger picture: the organizations that have been most vocal in the recent A-word issue – the Malay/Muslim NGOs and UMNO, or at the very least, prominent individuals within the party.

So what’s the picture that the dots, once connected, reveal? Personally, after thinking about it for a bit, Walski thinks that there’s actually more than just one picture, convoluted as these resulting images may be.

There are, in fact, at least two pictures – the first is that there is a concerted effort to eventually turn Malaysia into an Islamic theocracy, kind of like what’s happened in Acheh. But this possibility is not really feasible today because of one very important document, which stands in its way – the Federal Constitution. Enter Zulkifli Noordin, who during the last session of parliament intended to table amendments to the Constitution (via The Malaysian Insider), which would help pave the way. This is all part of the Third Power Column theory, which Walski has mentioned in the past.

Speaking of, yesterday, Walski posted a poll borrowed from The People’s Parliament having to do with Zulkifli Noordin. The result so far is close to unanimous – PKR should give the guy his walking papers.

The second emerging picture is that the Third Power Column, already in existence for quite a while, is being used as a tool by UMNO to help the party regain the political ground it lost during the last General Election in 2008, purportedly in the name of Islam. But things done for the sake of political expediency, no matter for what overt reasons, often have effects that last longer than intended. And sometimes these effects are not at all desired, nor anticipated.

The “support” given by the government and its agencies emboldens the Third Power Column. The action of the government in tolerating the post-Friday prayer protests is consistent with the theory that these organizations are being used for the ultimate aim of power consolidation.

Fine and well if the real objectives of UMNO are not achieved. But if UMNO succeeds, then the empowerment given to the various individuals and organizations can’t be yanked back overnight, lest UMNO loses its credibility with the column. The illusion of empowerment, however, is taken as license, and over time, gains momentum.

Once that momentum reaches a tipping point, it’ll be difficult for anyone to pull back the reins. Perhaps that’s why UMNO is so adamant on wanting to ensure that the Internal Security Act (ISA) remains on the books, as an escape clause should the shit really hit the fan.

Already, signs of this momentum are showing – interfaith dialogue is now being promoted by many parties, individuals in government included, as a means to amicably solve the A-word non-issue that’s become so contentious. As we saw in the 4-part Mahaguru58 video interview with Zul Noordin in yesterday’s posting, interfaith dialogue is something the Third Power Column is against, alluding that it will lead to bigger “demands”.

Whether or not Zulkifli Noordin is acting based on his own principles, or is being used as a tool by UMNO, either knowingly or otherwise, is left to be seen. It all depends on what PKR decides to do, and what Zul Noordin does after that.

The situation we have today is not something that happened overnight. Rather, it is the result of numerous events that have happened sporadically over the last decade or so, occurring out of political expediency, without much regard for long term effects that we are now witnessing – numerous hurried amendments to the Constitution, the “declaration” of Malaysia as an Islamic country, the demolishing of the judiciary as an independent institution, the civil service and government agencies becoming partisan, erosion of civil liberties – to name some that come to mind. These, further compounded with more recent events like what was described in the e-mail excerpt above.

And for what? All for the sake of short-sighted political expediency.

While the 1Malaysia concept may be an honest attempt to try to salvage what little social and national unity we have left, Walski can only describe it as trying to use a flimsy band-aid to treat an almost-severed limb. A case of too little, too late. Worse, with what’s happening on the ground, 1Malaysia sounds like nothing more than hollow sloganeering.

And that, folks, is the stark and ugly picture that the dots have revealed. Connecting the dots may have been fun and fascinating as a little kid when the images revealed were benign caricatures.

But the pictures that this recent connect-the-dots exercise has revealed… well, let’s just say that “benign“ isn’t a word that comes to mind.

So can you see what Walski sees, now that some of the dots have been connected?

He hopes that you do, because seeing the dot-obscured picture for what it is, is half the battle won, in Walski’s humble opinion...

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

Monday, January 25, 2010

Opinion Poll: Should PKR give Zulkifli Noordin his walking papers?

Technorati tags: , , , ,

Walski came across this poll, currently running at The People’s Parliament – “Should PKR sack Zulkifli Noordin?” – and decided that it’s important to let you folks know about it.

Then he thought – why stop there? And so, Walski decided to post the poll on this blog, too. You can find it at the sidebar, where all the surveys are usually placed.

Since Walski would like you make an informed decision when you cast your vote, it’s important to get to know Zul Noordin a little better, if you don’t already.

This getting-to-know-Zul lesson comes courtesy of a like-minded blogger with an ego bigger than his own good, Mahaguru58. Like-minded with Zul Noordin, that is…

The MG58 Interview (Part 1)

Still don't know Zul well enough? Wanna see/hear more of his "Islam-as-I-say-tion" paranoid “us against them” thoughts? Well, fret not, because there are 3 more parts to to this interview...
(more Zul than you could ever hope for, in the full post)

The only downside to this series of videos is that it’s conducted in Bahasa Malaysia. The other downside is that Walski doesn’t have the time to do an English transcript.

The MG58 Interview (Part 2)

The MG58 Interview (Part 3)

The MG58 Interview (Part 4)

Walski doesn’t know about you, but he thinks that 1hr 10min of Zul Noordin has been pretty much enough for him to make an informed decision.

To-date, as of the time of this posting, 3,893 persons have already cast their vote since the poll was released yesterday. And the result so far is not at all surprising, as far as Walski is concerned.

Well, what you waiting for? Vote already!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Poll Position: “Allah” for All

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

Without a doubt, the issue of who can use the word “Allah” is an emotionally charged one. What one could doubt, though, is whether it’s a question of theology, or if there are other agendas at play.

And when such a situation arises, you know that a myAsylum opinion poll can’t be far away. After a week, plus change, of running the poll, the results are in. This time around, the poll managed to get the opinions of over 4,100 persons. Not too shabby, if you ask Walski.

Click on image to view results via Polldaddy.com, image hosting by PhotobucketClick on image to see results at Polldaddy.com

Are the results surprising? Don’t know about you folks, but not to Walski. It reinforces his belief that the entire non-issue centers around something other than theology alone… 
(analyzing the results, and more, in the full post)

Apart from myAsylum, this poll was also picked up by RantingsbyMM, Unscientific Malaysia, and X-Blogs, plus a mention by Anas Zubedy (thanks bro!) – and Walski would like to thank them, again, for spreading the word far and wide. If you had run the poll, and Walski forgot to mention your blog or website, please leave him a comment. Truly, Walski is very grateful for your obliging to post the poll.

Walski had hoped more Muslims would participate, but he can live with the 27% – equivalent to 1,100 persons. Out of the 27%, 17.3% stated that they have no problem with “Allah” being used by anyone. This translates to roughly about 65% of participating Muslims (or 712 persons) – a majority, by any measure.

Which does make Walski wonder: exactly whom do the numerous (and mushrooming) Malay NGOs speak for?

Reading through the numerous opinions (on the Internet) of those who feel “Allah” is exclusively for Muslims, not one opinion successfully presents a solid theological basis for the exclusivity. These ranged from the assertion that Muslims worshipped a “different” God, to the oft-mentioned opinion that such allowance would “confuse Muslims”, to totally confused arguments convoluting religion and race.

Over the past week, Walski had two separate conversations with two Malaysian Muslims on what they thought. Both persons felt that it should be exclusive. What was interesting, however, was that both individuals had the notion that it was only recently that the Catholic Church was insisting on the use of “Allah” for God. Equally interesting is that neither one could really say with conviction that it was something actually theologically verboten. Contradiction, you say?

Yesterday, The Malaysian Insider published an opinion piece by  K. Anand, entitled “A letter to a Muslim friend". In it, Anand postulated that much of the opinions exhibited by Muslims promoting exclusivity, were based on flawed assumptions. Among them:

  • the insistence by Catholics on the use of "Allah" is something very recent
  • Jesus would also be referred to as “Allah” in Catholic publications
  • the Catholic Church chose to bring the case to court, when they should have chosen other “less provocative” channels
  • Allah” would also be used in the English version of The Herald
(source: The Malaysian Insider)

K. Anand’s piece provides an editorialized chronology (of sorts), plus some background information surrounding the issue, and it’s perhaps worth your while to give it a read.

One question remains, however: who’s been propagating strategic misinformation about the facts of the matter?

Another thing that Walski’s read is that the judgment by the presiding judge, the honorable Datuk Lau Bee Lan, was biased because she’s an “active preaching Christian”, further insinuating that “she has her own agenda (via Mahaguru58).

Walski will not comment on this, which he feels is tantamount to being in contempt of court. Instead, he urges you to read Datuk Lau’s judgment, which has been made available for download by LoyarBurok.com, and then decide for yourself. If you were to ask Walski, however, this accusation is purely based on sentiment and conjecture, without having even read the judgment. Or perhaps, caring to.

Also, numerous comments were left at the Polldaddy.com poll results page, incidentally. Apart from Walski’s own, a total of 50 comments, to be exact. Most of them were left by those who support the use of “Allah” by all.

Unless some new developments come up regarding this emotionally charged non-issue, this will probably be Walski’s last posting touching on the “Allah” debate. There are, in fact, many other more important issues, as opposed to this one, which Walski would rather focus on.

In any case, Walski would like to thank you for participating in the poll, and thank you once again to his fellow bloggers who saw it fit to re-post it on their own sites. Let’s hope this non-issue gets resolved real fast, because truthfully, folks, we’re just wasting too damned much energy on something so trivial, that God’s probably laughing real hard right now.

On the other hand, two questions raised in this post remain unanswered… so, we’ll see how it goeth.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

Thursday, January 14, 2010

HENN: World Insulation the "A"-word Controversy Solution

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

Malaysian Muslims to insulate themselves from the world 
myAsylum provides an exclusive report on the proposed final solution to the “Allah” controversy - reporting straight from Hell, and soon-to-be Hell-on-Earth, Malaysia. Another episode in the continuing series from the Hell-on-Earth News Network (HENN)

The recent controversy over the use of the “A”-word in Malaysia has highlighted just how fragile the faith and mind of the Malaysian Muslim community is. The fact remains that the unauthorized use of the “A”-word by non card-carrying Muslims will lead to the destruction of their faith.

But there’s no need to despair. Or think too much. The Coalition Of National Muslim Angry NGOs (CONMAN) has come out with a solution – totally insulate the Malaysian Muslim community from the world, a place deemed very dangerous to be in.

Abdul Ghabi Ahbal, head CONMAN coordinator, in an exclusive press statement provided to HENN, laid out the purpose and objective of this new faith-protection initiative.

Among the measures mooted included disallowing the unauthorized singing of state national anthems of Johor, Kedah, Pahang, Perak, Selangor, and Terengganu – all of which contain the “A”-word (via The Sensintrovert). How this would be enforced was not elaborated.

“Although many states have Syariah legislations prohibiting the unauthorized uttering of many exclusively Islamic words, like the “N” and “S”-words (via The Malaysian Insider), these are not easily enforceable since Syariah legislation has no jurisdiction over unauthorized persons,” said Abdul Ghabi in the statement.

So far, as a repercussion of the High Court allowing the Catholic publication, The Herald, to use the “A”-word in their Bahasa Malaysia edition, at least 8 Christian houses of worship had been fire-bombed, and one Sikh temple vandalized. Fortunately, due to the ineptitude of the fire-bombers (and the fact that gasoline still needs fire to ignite it), only one, The Metro Tabernacle Church in Kuala Lumpur, suffered significant damage. No claims of responsibility have been made thus far, and the government has assured the public that these isolated incidents will be investigated.

In the statement to HENN, Abdul Ghabi added that “a much more drastic program has to be put in place, in order that the fragile and easily confused minds of Malaysian Muslims are protected. Prohibiting others from using A**** in itself is insufficient, and more has to be done”.
(insulating Malaysian Muslims from the world, and more, in the full post)

The CONMAN statement clearly laid out the strategies required to protect the fragility of the Malaysian Muslims. Among them,

  • Prohibit the use of non-Islamic publications that contain the "A"-word, such as dictionaries. Since much effort would be required to black-marker every occurrence of the word, prohibition would be a more practical approach. Since the prohibition of dictionaries would also make it difficult to go to school, Muslims are also encourage to ditch school.
  • Prohibit the use of the Internet. The Internet, a bane of the modern age, has made the unauthorized use of prohibited words, like the “A”, “B”, “F”, “K”, “N” and “S”-words (among others) much less easy to police. Therefore, in order that the fragile faith of Muslims are protected, Muslims are encouraged to not use the Internet, and if possible, for the Malaysian Government to ban its use altogether.
  • Don’t Sing Problematic State Anthems. While it is unfortunate that the various states, namely Johor, Kedah, Pahang, Perak, Selangor, and Terengganu, didn’t have the foresight to realize just how precarious to the Muslim faith it is to include the “A”-word in their anthems, a stop-gap measure would be to prohibit the singing of these anthems. Discussions with the Akademi Fantasia to re-write these anthems are underway, but until such efforts bear fruit, prohibition is again the best path.
  • Restrict Unnecessary Media Access. Apart from the Internet, TV and Radio can also be sources of faith erosion. Therefore, Muslims are advised to restrict their viewing to RTM TV1, and to terminate their Astro subscriptions. Easy access to negative foreign news reporting can also be achieved. While these measures may produce short-term feelings of sensory depravation, the long-term benefits to faith protection is immense.
  • Promote Ignorance. Western propaganda has made the Muslims in Malaysia averse to ignorance, which in fact provides for enhanced religious bliss. Thinking for one’s self is something dangerous and only leads to critical analysis, which is detrimental to the well-being of Muslims in this country. Thinking, should therefore be left to those with the necessary qualifications (and certification, in the case of Selangor).

While admitting that these measures were, at best, stop gap, the CONMAN statement stated that a long-term high-tech measure was being formulated by the coalition.

Although in it’s preliminary stages of conceptualization, the statement indicated that the initiative, named eTempurung, would ensure that Muslims in Malaysia would be neurally programmed to be compliant individuals, utilizing electronic RFID chip implants with pain-producing algorithms that would automatically be activated if any non-compliance were to be detected.

However, independent preliminary investigations by myAsylum’s intrepid squad of Cybernetic Remote Autonomous Pararaoches (CRAP) have indicated that the eTempurung program was facing difficulties due to lack of technical information availability, sourced primarily through the Internet, which CONMAN have now prohibited for themselves.

The CONMAN statement did not indicate any timeline for the implementation of the stop gap guidelines, but in the closing paragraph, Abdul Ghabi indicated that it would be soon.

“The ultimate aim of these measures, to be implemented very soon, A****-willing, is to ensure that Muslims in Malaysia are sufficiently insulated from any unauthorized and dangerous knowledge and stimuli from the world around them. We have fallen far behind the efforts of faith protection – the only way to succeed in this world and the next – and are confident that our initiatives will one day put Muslims in Malaysia at par with their brothers and sisters in Afghanistan, Yemem, and Somalia, in terms of the strength of religious faith.”

HENN will keep a close one-eye on these developments, and on the progress of these insulatory initiatives. 
(© 2010 - Hell-on-Earth News Network)

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Champions of Fugly

Technorati tags: , , , ,

UMNO, it seems, wants to be the People’s Champion. And according to them, regardless of whom those Malaysian “people” might be. Not a surprising PR move, really – and some good PR is certainly what the party needs. Thinking about this over the weekend, Walski couldn’t help but recall another Champion from some years back.

The fugly champion, image taken from Cars++, hosting by PhotobucketThe fugly Champion - click on image to view source

The Juara really has to be the fugliest thing ever to come out of Proton. Which is probably why the vehicle, launched in 2001, was terminated only 2 years later. Nobody wanted to buy it, despite the advertising and promotion for the minivan.

The hazard of claiming oneself as a champion – of anything –  is that good Public Relations isn’t enough. You gotta live up to your claim. In a way, the Juara did live up to its name – it was hands down the champion of fugly.

But words and PR aside, what has UMNO proven itself to be a champion of?
(unearthing the true fugly cause of the People’s Champion, in the full post)

Okay, so they’re a champion of their own Malay demographic. But depending on who you talk to, even that’s kind of debatable, especially in the last decade or so. In fact, Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah, surprisingly still a member of the party, in his speech at the ISEAS Regional Outlook Forum 2010 last week, laments what has become of UMNO.

Umno started in 1946 as a grassroots-based party that commanded the idealism of my generation. After 1987 it was transformed into a top-down patronage machine. Party membership became a ticket to personal gain. The party attracted opportunists and ne’er do wells while good people stayed away in droves. For any organisation this is a death spiral.
(source: Razaleigh.com)

For Walski, to be Champion of the People means to champion causes that benefit all the people, and not just some select people. Take, for example, UMNO’s stand in the emotionally charged and blown-out-of-proportion non-issue of the use of the word “Allah”.

Umno’s position in the present controversy over the use of the term “Allah” by non-Muslims is an example. In a milestone moment, PAS, the Islamic party, is holding onto the more plural and moderate position while Umno is digging itself into an intolerant hardline position that has no parallel that I know of in the Muslim world. Umno is fanning communal sentiment, and the government it leads is taking up policy lines based on “sensitivities” rather than principle. The issue appears to be more about racial sentiment than religious, let alone constitutional principles.
(source: Razaleigh.com)

In other words, exactly what Walski has been saying all along, particularly in his previous post – that the issue is not one of theology, per se, but of communal sentiments. It’s nice to have one’s views vindicated from time to time, Walski tells ya.

Over the weekend, too, Walski was alerted to a blog posting by one Akhramsyah Muammar Ubaidah bin Sanusi, who is an UMNO member, and who happens to be the son of Sanusi Junid, a well-known UMNO politician, and one-time Chief Minister of Kedah (among other posts he’s held).

While what he wrote may not be the “official” UMNO stance, it does reflect the mindset of the party, or at the very least, the mindset of its membership. In refuting Marina M. (for not understanding and not representing the majority of the Malays), Akramsyah claims that the “Allah” issue is another chapter in the continuing denigration of the Malays, and says the decision by the High Court has “robbed” the Malays of the exclusive use of the word.

And for the Catholic Church to then venture down the silly path of robbing Malays of the exclusive use of the word Allah... Malays may be lobbing molotov cocktails at all churches indiscriminately, but this is only fair.
(source: Tangents: Restless Musings Of A Malay Mind)

What gives the Malays the right of exclusivity is never explained, of course. Even the Arab Muslims have never demanded such.

Give the article a read, if you haven’t already. To Akramsyah, and, by his claim of understanding the Malay psyche, the majority of Malays, the only resolution to this issue is to appease the Malays. Otherwise:

  • Malays will figure out that it is not just the fault of the churches, or the Christian heirarchy for robbing us of Allah, but the fault of all Christian congregations for letting their religious leaders continue to insult us.
  • Malays will figure out that now that they're in for a penny, might as well go for the pound by attacking Hindu temples for their original insults towards Malay communities by claiming the 'historical right' to build anywhere.
  • Malays will believe since many non-Malays were sitting idle by the side allowing Malays to be insulted, maybe they should be reminded to that they are condoning these insults.
  • Malays in organised mobs will turn on our leaders for being so limp in their defence of our rights.
  • By then it would be too late, as even intelligent Malays will figure out that as we're being accused of being racists anyway by the ungrateful children of 'Pendatang' in this country, might as be racists... the worst kind of racists...

It could very well be that this is just the opinion of one delusional UMNO member. And going by the comments the posting has received, that could very well be the case. But it does make one pause.

And in that pause, one may just ask this question: exactly who are the “people” that UMNO really wants to champion?

The latest development, and one that Walski finds disturbing, surrounding the “Allah” non-issue is what HRH Sultan of Selangor has decreed that the state government prevent the usage of the word “Allah” by non-Muslims, in order that the faith of the Muslims is safeguarded (via The Malaysian Insider, article in Bahasa Malaysia).

Disturbing, because the institution of royalty has been dragged into the picture, and in a way, the decree subverts the decision of the courts. And in the process, the feudal psyche of the Malay mindset comes to fore. Think about it though – apart from bragging rights, what exactly does not allowing the word “Allah” to be used by anyone who chooses to, achieve?

It’s no big secret that it has been UMNO, and UMNO-linked NGOs, that have been on the forefront of protesting against the High Court decision. It’s also glaringly obvious that the Government has been very partisan in this matter – not surprising, since the head honchos in government come from the same political party.

If anything, what UMNO has successfully demonstrated to be championing is the cause of perpetuating the Malay feudalistic, and sometimes fatalistic, psyche and mindset. No amount of positive PR can change that. Not even claiming themselves to be the People’s Champion.

Because, quite simply, they are not. Action, as they say, speaks louder than PR.

And when the action of late has been nothing short of fugly, that’s exactly the kind of “Champion” UMNO can ever claim to be.

Juara, indeed. 

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

Sunday, January 10, 2010

Poll Position Pit-Stop: Mid-poll Results & Some Analysis

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

This post is only partly about the poll that is currently running – it will also look at the issues surrounding this big fuss over semantics and labeling. Yes, that’s what it pretty much boils down to, Walski’s decided.

But first, thanks to all who have participated in the current Poll Position opinion poll, which asks your opinion about the usage of the word “Allah”. The response has been beyond expectations, truth be told. And for that, Walski has to profusely thank Marina M., Unscientific Malaysia, and xBlogBonology.com, for hosting the poll.

As of the time of posting, close to 2,500 persons have registered their opinion.

Results from Polldaddy.com, image hosting by Photobucket(click on image to view results on poll site)

It’s heartening to note that the majority feel the word “Allah” may be used for all, and not exclusive for Muslims. A further breakdown, however, is where it gets interesting. Of course, it’s not a really scientific survey, but Walski thinks that it does mirror the reality of how most Malaysians feel.

In any case, the poll will remain open until next Friday, so there’s ample time to register your opinion, if you haven’t yet.

Related to this issue is, of course, the attacks on the four churches (the fourth being the Good Shepherd Lutheran Church in PJ [via The Malaysian Insider]) in the Klang Valley yesterday. Which brings us to what Walski wants to focus on for the rest of this post – what are the REAL issues surrounding the “Allah” issue?
(delving into the issues, and more, in the full post)

On the surface, it would appear that the angst and agitation we are witnessing surround theology and religion. And that seems to be the argument articulated by most of those who are against the High Court decision pertaining to the usage of “Allah” by The Herald.

And that argument says, pretty much, that the word “Allah” is for the exclusive use of Muslims, and Muslims alone.

Image from Malaysiakini, hosting by Photobucket The problem with this argument is that there is enough scriptural and real-world evidence to suggest otherwise.

It wouldn’t be practical for Walski to include and rehash all opinions that have been voiced. He will, however, give you two contrasting articles, as examples.

The first is an article written by one Dr. Khalif Muammar, published at MyIslamnetwork.net (official website for PEMBELA, a coalition of Muslim conservatives formed to “defend Islam”), which attempts to present why non-Muslims cannot use the word Allah (emphasis by myAsylum).

The fact is that the word Allah even though it was used before Islam, it has been Islamized, the meaning of it is no longer the same as before. By permitting non Muslim to use it we actually doing deislamization. We are reverting the course which was done by our Prophet. Hence, we will be responsible for making more Muslim become confused. Professor Wan Mohd Nor says the context of Arabs and the Malay world is different, non Muslim in our land especially did not use the word Allah before this, there is no such word in their language before, in the original work they called it Yahweh, why not they call tuhan Yahweh. Therefore, it is evident that this issue is brought to confuse the Muslims. They wanted Allah become the name of other gods as well. The fact is that our God is not the same as the god of Christianity, their god can have son, it is a humanized god.
(source: MyIslamnetwork.net)

Nevermind that the argument closely mirrors the schoolyard-like “my Allah is bigger than your God” banter – a more important question is this: does this argument mirror reality?

In an article written in 2007, Dr. Farish Noor, whom at the time was in Cairo, had this to say:

What is most striking to the outside observer like me - though rather banal for the Egyptians themselves - is the fact that in all these celebrations ranging from Eid for the Muslims to Christmas for the Catholics and Copts the word ‘Allah’ is used to denote that supreme and singular divinity, God. Catholics and Copts alike exclaim ‘Masha-allah’, ‘Wallahi’, ‘ya-Rabbi’, ‘Wallah-u allam’, and of course ‘Allahuakbar’ day in, day out, everywhere they go. The coptic taxi driver blares out ‘By Allah, cant you see where you are parking??” as he dodges the obstable ahead. The Catholic shopkeeper bemoans “Ya Allah, ya Allah! You can only offer me two pounds for the scarf? Wallahi, my mother would die if she heard that! Ya-Rabbi, ya-Rabbi!”
(source: The American Muslim)

Back to the Dr. Khalif Muammar article for a bit – the opening paragraph states something very important:

There is no nas qat’i (conclusive/definitive evidence) from the Qur’an and the Sunnah on this matter. All the evidences put forward by those who permit it, do not show that it is permissible for non Muslim to use the word Allah. Since there is no conclusive evidence from the Qur’an and the Sunnah, this matter falls under zanniyyat, something which is based on human discretion. Muslim scholars need to base their argument on historical, epistemological, theological and semantic analysis. There will be right and wrong opinions depend on who has the strong argument. Definitely wisdom and in-depth analysis must be stressed, and not just literal interpretation. Although there is no conclusive evidence this does not mean that we cannot reach certainty in dealing with this issue.
(source: MyIslamnetwork.net)

By Dr. Khalif’s own admission, then, it’s up to “human discretion”. And if you read the entire article, it becomes clear that PEMBELA has made up their mind that the word “Allah” is exclusively for Muslims – at their discretion. And yes, the standard-issue arguments against liberalism, of “confusing Muslims” and blaming the West, are all thrown in for good measure.

Even more precarious is the suggestion that Muslims and Christians (plus everyone else) worship different gods. And for a Muslim, that is a very slippery slide of a path to take. But that’s a theological dead horse, in his opinion, and one which Walski has no intention to flog any further in this post.

So, it’s pretty clear there is no scriptural evidence to suggest that non-Muslims cannot use the word “Allah”. And since “Allah” is, after all, an Arabic word, and is used in the Middle East by just about all Arabs, what really is the big deal?

The answer, he thinks, lies in a very honest and telling blog post, written by Sakmongkol AK47, a blogger whom Walski has a lot of respect for. The following are excerpts from a posting on January 3, 2010, entitled “O Allah, is this our fin de siècle?”. Walski has chosen these excerpts because he feels that these are at the core of the real issue surrounding the agitated response to the High Court decision, and the subsequent angst amongst many Malaysian Muslims (emphasis by myAsylum).

In the Malaysian context, Allah has always been the god of Islam. Whose religion is this? It is the religion of the Malays. It is the religion of 15-16 million Malaysians as opposed to the religion of between 850,000 to 1 million Catholics. The judgment offends the sensibilities of 15-16 million people. It is causing much grief and resentment.

Is victory over the usage of the word Allah here in Malaysia, a form of satisfaction-giving retribution to the Malays? To the triumphalists, this legal victory is one form of saying FU! right into the face of the 'stupid' Malay?

                                                  ------ // ------

Indeed, Islam and Malay are synonymous. A Malay is defined as one who speaks the Malay language, practices Malay culture and adopts Islam as his religion. Hence when you make judgment on Allah which is the god of Islam here in Malaysia, you are also judging on the Malay. By taking over the term Allah, what have you done?

You take over the very being of a Malay.

                                                  ------ // ------

You do that at what costs? Has the judge applied her mind on the costs that may arise out of this judgment? At the end of the day, this victory savored by the Catholics here in Malaysia, may in fact be just a Pyrrhic or Cadmean victory.

It is simply incredible to expect 16 million Malay Muslims to tolerate that decision. You may say the word Allah has been used for the last 400 years and what not. Or you may even say, just to win points in an argument, that Arabs don't have issue with the usage of the term Allah by non Muslim Arabs. But we are not in the Middle east and thankfully so. We are in Malaysia where we must learn to accept reality.

                                                  ------ // ------

The reality is the court ruling is perceived as a direct challenge and affront to the sense of Muslim. Malays cannot understand the insistence that Catholics be allowed to use the term Allah when referring to their god. In practice, Allah has always been associated with the religion of Islam and to read some esoteric meaning into it so that it can be treated as a universal term by Christians here is simply wrong.

It is wrong because it will be interpreted as designed to cause offense to Muslim sensitivity. We can't expect 16 million Muslims to sit idly by and accept the ruling without coming up in arms. Do Catholics in Italy, France refer to God as Allah?

(source: Sakmongkol AK47)

So, there you have it – the issue has little to do with theology, but with the Malay psyche. Right or wrong, as far as Islam is concerned, is almost irrelevant. To further support this assertion, one need not look further than to analyze which political bodies and NGOs are the ones that have been most vocal in their objection against the High Court decision.

Image from The Malaysian Insider, hosting by PhotobucketPost-Friday prayer protest in Shah Alam
(click on image to read The Malaysian Insider report)

It is all revolving around communal politics, folks. Islam is once again being used as a convenient tool to smoke-screen other agendas. The saddest part is that many Malay/Muslims don’t realize this, and have allowed themselves to be swayed, thinking it’s all about religion, and nothing else but religion.

In this particular case, it’s to protect the “Malay psyche”. But it’s a psyche that refuses to adapt to changing times and circumstances. It’s a psyche that has been way too protected, to the point of being detrimental to its own good. It’s a psyche that’s constantly being bombarded with incessant fear, some of which, in turn, embeds itself permanently.

And in the final analysis, this protection serves one important purpose – keeping a certain demographic trapped in their status quo, with no hope for real and meaningful change.

Azmi Sharom, a columnist and law professor at Universiti Malaya, told Al Jazeera that "the unrest is not surprising because of the fact that the government has been pandering to these kinds of people for a long time".

He said the government allowed some groups to protest when others were banned because the main ruling Umno party - which depends on the Malay/Muslim demographic to remain in power - was "unwilling to do anything which would seem to go against what they think is the Malay/Muslim desire".

"This is a noisy demographic and it is potentially dangerous for Umno to alienate them, so this will be a real test for Najib's administration," he said.

(source: Aljazeera)

And there is one other final reason why Walski thinks that it’s more about communal politics, than about religion – the fact that knowing very well the misfortune that had befallen their fellow Malaysians, the NGOs decided to go ahead with their protests yesterday, after the Friday congregational prayers. This, to Walski, was an act of sheer insensitivity and selfishness.

And such insensitivity has no part in the Islam that Walski knows. Regardless of what Awang Selamat, or the likes of Ibrahim Ali, may want you to believe. And while the NGOs have offered to provide protection to the churches (via Malaysiakini), the impression Walski gets is that this offer is not out of sincerity, but more out of guilt – it would’ve made a world of difference had you decided to call off the protests.

To the Christians in Malaysia, in particular the Catholics, Walski salutes your perseverance and patience, in light of the attacks carried out on your houses of worship. You could have very easily retaliated with force. Instead, you retaliated with prayer and forgiveness. And that is a valuable example for all to learn from.

It makes Walski wonder, what would the response have been if the tables had been turned, and mosques were the target instead.

To all Malaysians reading this, particularly the Muslims, there has been a petition started by Marina M. asking that you condemn any violent acts against peoples of other faiths. It is also heartening to note that 110 NGOs and 3 political parties have come out to unconditionally condemn the act of violence against the churches this week (via Aliran, HT to Anil Netto). Malaysiakini reports that the number of endorsees now stands at 121, as of last night.

After all, regardless of our heritage and beliefs, we are all passengers on this mothership called Malaysia.

"The lamps are different but the Light is the same"
Rumi

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

Friday, January 08, 2010

Poll Position: The ISA

Technorati tags: , , , ,

Usually, Walski publishes these results first before putting up another poll. This time around, however, we’ve had to change the plan a little. In any case, on December 25, a few newspapers published reports about the coming changes to the Internal Security Act, more ominously known as the ISA.

Berita Harian took it another notch and said that “Everybody Agrees ISA to remain” – hence, the poll to determine whether that was an accurate interpretation or not. Well, here are the results.

Poll results from Polldaddy.com, image hosting by Photobucket

And it appears that Everybody in this case only accounted for about 8%.
(a brief analysis, and more, in the full post)

Ok, there are two ways that we can look at the results. The first is that we look at how many would like the ISA to remain. We can roughly surmise that this figure amounts to 34% (adding 26% and 8%). That still leaves 66% – the majority – who think that the ISA should be repealed altogether.

The second way to look at it is this: only 8% want the ISA to remain, stating that it’s the only way to maintain national security. If you ask Walski, though, he’d be more concerned about the fact that jet engines could have been stolen from an airbase – now that is a more serious security concern.

Either way, the majority of those who participated do not want the ISA, in the form it is today. So, how the heck could that account for “Everybody”? Simply put, it doesn’t, and Berita Harian was merely exercising its editorial license, based on their own organization agenda. Because if you had read the English press, what the “experts” felt was that while a law like the ISA was needed, it’s form needed change.

That, however, is probably arguable.

In any case, rather than speculating what the proposed amendments are gonna look like, Walski chooses to wait until those amendments are tabled in Parliament. While ideally he would like to see the law (and a few other ones, too) repealed, Walski realizes that the stark reality is that a snowball has a better chance of surviving in Hell, than for the ISA to be repealed, as long as the current government is in power.

The most that we can realistically expect, therefore, are amendments that will hopefully remove any possibility of abuse.

Last but not least, Walski would like to thank Marina M. who was kind enough to host this poll on her blog, in addition to it being here, and on the Polldaddy site. Without her support the participation wouldn’t have been as much – a total of 392 votes were cast during the week period the poll was up. 

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

2Tongues, 1CONDEMNATION

Technorati tags: , , ,

Update @ 1248hrs: The Star has reported that a third church, the Life Chapel Church (located in Section 17 PJ), was also the target of attack. The report stated that a molotov cocktail was found on the porch of the church at 8:30am this morning. This, to Walski, indicates that these were not random attacks, but something that was likely to have been planned – but by whom?

Original Post:
This is what Walski considers an unplanned post, but one that needed to go out, post-haste. It is in both English and Bahasa Malaysia (in the full post), and it concerns a needless act of violence that took place last night.

A Statement Of Condemnation
myAsylum joins the voices of all peace-loving Malaysians in strongly condemning the attack on the Metro Tabernacle Church, in Desa Melawati, Kuala Lumpur, early this morning.

While no one has claimed responsibility, it is strongly believed that this act of wanton violence and disrespect has to do with the recent High Court decision in lifting the ban by the Home Ministry on the Catholic publication The Herald from using the word “Allah” in the Bahasa Malaysia version of the publication.

Regardless of who is responsible, there is no justification, religious or otherwise, to carry out such needless acts, which will only heighten tensions, and cause further disharmony.

This fire-bomb attack MUST be strongly condemned by ALL Malaysians, regardless of creed. 
(the Bahasa Malaysia version, and more, in the full post)

Sebuah Kenyataan Kutukan
myAsylum, menyertai suara semua rakyat Malaysia yang mencintai kedamaian, mengutuk dengan sekeras-kerasnya tindakan serangan ke atas Gereja Metro Tabernacle, di Desa Melawati, Kuala Lumpur, awal pagi tadi.

Sungguhpun belum ada mana-mana pihak yang mengaku bertanggung-jawab, adalah dipercayai tindakan ganas serta tak beradab ini ada kaitan dengan keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi tempoh hari, berkenaan dengan penarikan balik larangan penggunaan perkataan “Allah” ke atas versi Bahasa Malaysia The Herald oleh Kementerian Dalam Negeri.

Tidak kira siapa pun yang bertanggung jawab, tidak ada alasan, baik dari segi agama atau sebaliknya, untuk melakukan perbuatan seperti ini, yang hanya akan menambahkan ketegangan, dan memudharatkan situasi harmoni antara kita semua.

Seharusnya, tindakan serangan bom api ini MESTI dikutuk oleh SEMUA rakyat Malaysia, tak kira apa agama yang dianuti, dengan sekeras-kerasnya.

~ ~ ~ o O o ~ ~ ~

Walski hopes that all Malaysians joins myAsylum in condemning this cowardly act of aggression and violence. And if you wish to use the text from the above statement, in either language, please feel free – you have Walski’s no-strings-attached permission.

He also found out later that The Church of the Assumption in Petaling Jaya also faced a similar attempt, but fortunately the homemade explosives thrown into the church did not explode, as reported by The Malaysian Insider.

Let’s also not speculate as to who the responsible party might be, even though we have our suspicions, based on recent events and statements. That approach is pointless.

The bottom line is this: the act must be condemned by all Malaysians. Period.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

Sunday, January 03, 2010

Opinion Poll: What's in a name?

Technorati tags: , , , ,

More about the results of the previous poll in a later post – this new poll’s gotta be released first. Priorities, ya know?

For reasons that are obvious (to Walski at least), the oft-overused Shakespearean line immediately comes to mind.

"What's in a name? That which we call a rose By any other name would smell as sweet."
(Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet, Act II Scene ii)

Screenshot of latest poll, hosting by Photobucket And the name that’s being debated is “Allah” – the God, in Arabic, whose use to many Malaysians, is synonymous with Islam.

The debate over who can and cannot use this word, recently resurrected itself after the December 31, 2009 court decision in favor of the Herald, allowing the use of the word “Allah” in it’s Malay language section.

The judge in that case ruled “that usage of the word was constitutional as long as the periodical was confined to educating the followers of the Christian faith(via The Malaysian Insider).

This decision, needless to say, has not been well-received by the defenders of Islam in Malaysia. And the arguments most used are that allowing anyone else other than Muslims to use the word will “confuse the Muslims”, and that it is “an affront to Islam”.

And so with the scene set, Walski figured that it was time to unleash another opinion poll, located at this blog’s sidebar, or at this site.

Knowing that the reader demographic of myAsylum tends to lean towards the liberal, Walski has a big favor to ask you – let the more conservative amongst us know about this poll, and ask them – politely – to voice their opinion. 
(spreading the word far ‘n wide, and more, in the full post)

There are a few ways you can help spread the word:

  • simply tell folks you know - never underestimate the power of word-of-mouth
  • direct them to this blog post
  • if you have a Blogger-based blog, embed the poll in your own blog sidebar (click on the button you see immediately underneath the poll. Note, however, that the widget is only for Blogger based blogs. If you’re blog is on a different platform, let Walski know and he’ll send you the codes. Alternatively, go to the polling site (at Polldaddy.com), where you can find an embed code (but he’s not sure how well that one works, ‘cause he’s never tried using it)

The poll will remain open until midnight on Friday, January 15, 2010. Regardless of what happens between now and then, it’s important that your opinion is heard. Or seen, as the case may be.

Not to skew the result of this poll, but as far as Walski is concerned, this is a very emotionally charged non-issue. And one that is being exploited for political reasons, more than anything else – even the so-called religious reasons actually have their roots in politics.

In any case, for or against, Walski looks forward to your opinions…

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

Saturday, January 02, 2010

2010 - A Continuing Odyssey

Technorati tags: , ,

Before he gets too carried away, Walski would like to wish one and all a very happy New Year to myAsylum readers wherever they may be – even if it’s not quite 2010 yet where you are.

Happy New Year 2010, image hosting by Photobucket

Fellow-blogger Rapera, in his welcome-2010/goodbye-2009 post asks us an important question:

Is the year “new” or will we be “new”?

Pondering on this for a bit, what has changed about your world when you woke up to 2010 this morning?

As far as Walski can tell (from not suffocating and keeling over), the air in his world is still 78.084% Nitrogen, 20.948% Oxygen, 0.934% Argon, 0.031% CO2, and 0.03% dan lain-lain (give or take). By volume, that is. Exactly like it was in the old year.

So just what is so new about the New Year?
(what Walski would & wouldn’t like to have in 2010, and more in the full post)

Well, physically, not a thing. As Rapera aptly hinted, it’s us that changes with every year, and not the year itself. And so, whatever Walski wants in this new year – and for that matter what anyone else does – will depend on human factors that have nothing to do with the movement of time.

But let’s not belabor this point to death – Walski knows, as he knows you know, that the “new year” is but a point of reference that we give, within a system we practice, so as to be able to describe past/present/future events more precisely. So that instead of having to say “four hundred and thirty seven days ago”, we can simply say October 21st 2008. There’s absolutely no significance to this date, by the way, except that it was a Tuesday.

In any case, there are a few things that Walski would like to see happen this year. And some that he’d like a lot less of. And even some he’d like to see gone forever.

Realistically, much of what Walski wants he has no control over, and will require change in other people and institutions. One can still hope, no?

First, here are what Walski would like less of:

Politics – Ever since the run-up to the March 8, 2008 General Elections – almost 2 years ago now – Malaysia has been caught up in this perpetual, never-ending spin-cycle of politics. It’s long past the point of being tiresome – Walski finds it fucking irritating. To the max. And before you go screaming “Opposition sympathizer” on Walski’s ass, he thinks that it’s the fault of all parties, not just BN. EVERY-fucking-BODY. So, here’s some unsolicited advice that Walski would like to impart: stop with the politics, and get down to doing some real productive shit. Both to BN and to PR. To BN, you did badly during GE12 – you know it, and we sure as hell know it – now get on with life and start doing the work you were elected to do. And stop trying to undermine the states you lost with coups and underhanded tactics. You wanna win them back? The next GE is the proper platform. To PR, Walski realizes that the reality of governance is something you are only now coming to grips with, and that the Federal Government is not making life easy. Just don’t forget one thing – we didn’t elect you so that certain segments of your coalition can turn this nation into a theocracy. You did real good in coming up with a Common Policy Framework – just make sure you keep to your word, and walk your talk. And if any of the politicians are closet BN/UMNO wannabes – let them go – you don’t need any politician that’s less than sincere in your fold (okay, a “sincere politician” does sound like an oxymoron, but you get Walski’s drift).

Moral Policing – Bad enough that Malaysia is a police state, let’s all make sure it doesn’t further de-evolve into a Moral Police state. Sometimes, Walski feels that the only gratification Moral Policing gives is in the creation of “criminals” – oh, and making sure that this life is as hellish as possible. That said, in this respect, 2010 got off to a great start.

Walski’s just glad the girl didn’t actually jump down, or fall off, from the building. Assholes. And to think that there are those who actually wish for more of this in Malaysia. Bigger Assholes.

The photo you see on the left is from a similar news report in The Star.

Worried about her precarious position, the officer asked her boyfriend to coax her.
(source: The Star)

Worried about her precarious position, or of your own fucking culpability, should something nasty have happened to the poor girl. And looking at the drop, she would have suffered severe hurt, or maybe even permanent death, should she have jumped, or fallen.

And if that had happened, would the authorities have been charged? The cynic in Walski thinks not – and if that’s the kind of Malaysia that some Malaysians want, and God-forbid manage to one day achieve, then it’s no country worth staying on in. At best, at that too is a real stretch, this sort of crap is best left for the burgeoning reality TV that we’re being bombarded with.

Reality TV Shows – Speaking of which, it seems as though almost every conceivable (and sometimes inconceivable) situation now gets turned into a reality TV show. It was novel for a while, but now it’s gotten to the point of being ridiculous. If some obese fuck needs to lose weight, fine. They should for the sake of their health. But they don’t have to make the rest of the world suffer along. Oh, but it inspires unhealthily fat people to lose weight, you say? Look at it this way – if the mirror in your house, and snickering behind your back, is not inspiration enough, then a reality TV show probably isn’t going to, either. Come to think of it – what of those who get eliminated from the show along the way? Are they Bigger-than-Biggest losers? And if Moral Policing escapades in Malaysia were to be turned into Reality TV (shudder), can we name the program Even Bigger Than the Bigger-than-Biggest Loser?

Racism – Let’s face it – an entire system that was built, over the last half a century, along racial lines is not something that will be easy to dismantle. But that doesn’t mean that it should be further encouraged, either. What kind of superiority can one claim, when in the same breath one says that they’re in perpetual need of preferential treatment, or for thinking anyone owes you a living? And by the way, it’s time we came to grips with the fact that Malaysia (plus Malaya & the Malay Archipelago before that) has always been a melting pot, and that almost EVERYONE’s forefathers was, at one time or another, a pendatang. No insult intended – even Walski’s proud of his pendatang heritage. Why settle for bland ketupat, when it’s so much tastier with a variety of sauces?

Environmental Damage – Regardless of what your opinion is on Global Warming, one thing you’ll have to admit is that we (as in humans) are responsible for a lot  of damage to the environment, in the process of this thing called development. The horrendous landslips at Highland Towers and Bukit Antarabangsa were not “acts of God” per se, but the repercussion of hill-cutting, natural foliage removal, and the subsequent erosion, as a result. Mother Earth is a self-regulating closed system of gigantic proportions – imbalance of something will cause a shift in something else, as the system regulates itself. Take Carbon Dioxide, for example – the fact that it continues to hover around 0.03% (by volume) in the air we breathe is a clue that the excess CO2 that we spew into the atmosphere (and don’t say we don’t) had to have gone somewhere. The fact that we also keep cutting down natural nocturnal CO2 ingestors – tress, to you and Walski – is an added pressure to the environment to regulate itself. Hence, increased acidity in our oceans and groundwater, to maintain the fine balance in the air we breathe, between living, and keeling over gasping for air. It’s the simple principle of what-goes-around-comes-around. So yeah, let’s be more kind to the environment, shall we?

There are quite a few other things, too, like Stupidly Suicidal Drivers, Corruption, and Public Stupidity, which Walski won’t elaborate on. Otherwise, this post will be never-ending.

That said, there are a few things that Walski would like to see more of:

Walking The Talk – It’s important, just like Walking The Dog, which if you don’t do, will simply cause the accumulated poo-poo to one day appear in places you don’t want it to. And if the dog happens to be sitting by a fan when that time comes, the result might just be explosively messy. In any case, many promising things have been promised (for lack of a better word) – liberalization, 1Malaysia (in the true sense), etc. Well, saying is one thing – it’s time to put some action to those words. Otherwise, it’ll be another year of active sloganeering. Of course, the biggest stumbling block to political leaders’ aspirations is sometimes the members of their own political party, who may be a tad intellectually challenged to fully appreciate the true value of what’s proclaimed. It goes back to what Walski said earlier about doing the right things vs. politics being a popularity contest.

Acceptance – And not just tolerance. Tolerance, to Walski, merely means putting up with things you find distasteful. Like tolerating stupidity, for instance. Acceptance, on the other hand, is the wholehearted belief that others have the right to be as they are. No matter who these others are, or what it is they choose to be. We’ve seen some minor progress in 2009, and Walski hopes that he’ll see a lot more in 2010, and beyond. 2010 promised to be a good start when the courts ruled that no one community has the exclusive right to use ‘Allah’ (via The Malaysian Insider). At least, until the Court of Repeal has anything to say about it. ButImage hosting by Twitpic already, some Muslim exclusivst groups are up in arms over the decision. Including one former Selangor Chief Minister who says that he’s in mourning over the decision, and a Member of Parliament from the same political party who says that the decision will “stir racial tension(both news items via The Malaysian Insider). Not 'religious' tension, mind you, but 'racial’ tension. You really have to wonder how the exclusivist logic works. Or if there’s any logic involved to begin with. It’s almost like the age old playground taunt of “my God is better than your god”, when every Muslim knows that there’s only one god. It’s not like the Big Guy wears a name tag with ‘Allah’ written on it. So yeah, some acceptance of the fact no one religious/race community has exclusivity to God would be very nice for a change. And that’s acceptance, mind you, not tolerance.

Equal Access To Persecution-free Entertainment – And not a 1Apartheid situation where it’s a “crime” for one demographic to have fun (in whatever manner they like, as long as it doesn’t hurt others), and not a crime for everybody else. This really goes back to the No Moral Policing bit Walski already elaborated on earlier. Also, some lightening up on the “will bring about moral decay” rhetoric when it comes to entertainment would be great. Fine if you use that argument on corruption, but it really is a stretch when it comes to things which the young, and young-at-heart, regard as fun. And really, there is no “fun” in fundamentalism, no matter how tangled you try twisting your logic around.

Better Public Transportation – This, in fact, is related to Walking The Talk that was mentioned a few paragraphs back. Because so far, all we hear is talk. Talk, talk, talk. And while the poo-poo has already hit the proverbial fan, as far as KL is concerned on any given workday, it’s still not beyond the point of no return. The fact that Walski has greater hopes in Indonesia being socially more conducive to living (provided the fundies are kept at bay), it doesn’t mean he likes Jakarta traffic. And by Public Transportation, Walski means Public Transportation SYSTEM – not the piecemeal, not-very-connected islands of public transportation that KL boasts. Integrated? Look the damned word up in a dictionary before calling yourself that.

Civil Liberties – The broadening spectrum of civil liberties is what Walski hopes to see more of in 2010. We’ve been getting better in some respects, but much, much worse in others. The stunt pulled by the Government late last year of having stricter news censorship and obfuscation rules, in the guise of “self-regulation”, came under attack by the media bodies themselves. And now we’re hearing about new film censorship guidelines, to be introduced in 2010, of which Walski’s not entirely optimistic about. But he’ll give it the benefit of the doubt until the time it’s released, and (hopefully) open to scrutiny. Included in the spectrum of civil liberties is, of course, free speech, which unfortunately didn’t fare too well in ‘09. Again, Walski hopes for the best in the coming year…

To comprehensively go over every single thing that Walski would like more, and those that he’d like less, in one single post would mean that he’ll have nothing to write about for the rest of the year.

So, on that thought, he’d better stop here for now.

But in truth, this year will only reveal itself to be “new” if we make the effort to change ourselves for the better, and towards making what we want a reality. Many things, of course, are not entirely in our hands. Surprisingly, however, it’s amazing how even one small single action can have far reaching ramifications, whether we realize it, or not, at the onset.

It’s all part of the strange and mysterious continuum we call life, where 2010 is but another unfolding chapter…

Walski’s borrowed inspiration for post title creation acknowledgement footnote: Sci-fi buffs will probably have the suspicion that the post title is somehow related to Arthur C. Clarke’s “2010: Odyssey Two”. And you would be absolutely spot-on, if you suspected as much. Guilty, as charged.

Okay, so space travel hasn’t advanced as far as Clarke had envisioned 28 years ago when he wrote the Hugo Award winning book, and we’ve certainly not found any intelligent monoliths of unknown origin, nor come any closer to explaining the mysteries of life, the universe, and everything unexplainable. Not even why is it that some people find durians utterly disgusting.

But since it’s the only book Walski’s read that has 2010 in it, it became the natural choice of inspiration.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......