In need to find something?
Custom Search

Saturday, February 06, 2010

Ibrahim Ali's 300

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

For tonight, we dine… in KOMTAR!

Image taken from Malaysiakini, hosting by Photobucket

Or “today”, as the case may be.

Walski couldn’t help but think about exactly that phrase when he read the Malaysiakini report (from which the picture above was taken).

Some 300 angry protesters from various Malay non-governmental organisations torched an effigy of Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng near the state government office in Komtar this afternoon.
(source: Malaysiakini - subscription required)

And what were the 300 “Malays” – not Spartans – so pissed off about?

Among other things, what they claim as the discriminative demolition of Malay-owned stalls, which incidentally were unlicensed.

The following YouTube comes from a pro-Malay rights / pro-UMNO blog, called Pisau.net, which reported on the protest.

What better way to spend a Friday afternoon, after congregational prayers, than to raise some hell in Georgetown, eh?

Welcome to city life boys… DBKL demolishes unlicensed stalls all the time. Care to come to KL and raise some hell?  
(more misadventures of Froggy & his 300, and more, in the full post)

Oh, and guess who was in attendance? None other than Malay ultra right-wing, neither here, nor there Ibrahim “Froggy” Ali, president of PERKOSA PERKASA, as reported by The Malaysian Insider.

Click on image for a larger version, hosting by Photobucket Finding out about which, Walski’s mind immediately conjured the image you see on the right.

Not as menacing as the Gerard Butler’s King Leonidas, but not exactly a pretty sight either. Neither is Ibrahim Ali quite as fit, in all likelihood, despite promoting himself as a warrior. Walski won’t even think of him as a Warrior Princess – that would be an insult to Xena.

Not too long ago, Ibrahim Ali blasted his disgust against DAP for stepping on the poster of Perak state legislators who’d jumped ship from Pakatan Rakyat to become independents, paving the way for the political fiasco in Perak.

Froggy said that such behavior, exhibited by “disrespectful non-Malay leaders”, was insolent.

Well, Walski supposes it’s okay if his own people do it. Worse, the effigy of Lim Guan Eng was set ablaze – and then stepped upon.

In most reasonable people’s books, this is called “double-standards”. In Walski’s book (being not very reasonable right now), he simply calls it hypocrisy. Or, by other terminology, more familiar to these jokers – munafik.

Equally as munafik-y was the police’s attitude towards the protest (which obtained a permit, incidentally) – extremely tolerant. Too bad they don’t practice the same tolerance when it comes to peaceful protests perceived to not be in favor of UMNO/BN. But that’s Malaysia for ya.

Walski’s not exactly sure what they intend to achieve by such a rowdy display. It certainly doesn’t do their cause any favors, as it reinforces the stereotype that Malays are emotionally fragile and volatile – like, don’t piss off the Malays, ‘cos they’re very likely to go ballistic on you.

Image taken from Malaysiakini, hosting by Photobucket

Yeah, yeah… Walski knows that it’s all about this ketuanan

But consider this – what kind of superiority are you claiming when you insist that the rest of the world treats you as “special”? And that, while you’re “superior”, you’re in constant need of assistance, hand-outs, protectionist quotas, and what not, because you’re so bloody superior, you can’t compete with other Malaysians?

It just doesn’t make any sense whatsoever. At least, not to Walski. And it certainly doesn’t lend any positivity to the concept of 1Malaysia.

All he can say is that perhaps it’s high time these warriors of race realize that what they’re doing is not doing them any favors at all. Championing a stereotype, that is.

Walski firmly believes that he, just like most Malaysians, belongs to the human race, and really wonders what race Ibrahim Ali and his 300 think they belong to…

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

Sunday, January 31, 2010

The Cult of Ibrahim Ali

Technorati tags: , , , ,

Otherwise known as Perkasa – or Perkosa, as Aisehman thinks they should be called.

Well, a couple of days ago, they had the official launch of the Selangor chapter (via The Malaysian Insider), officiated by none other than Dr. M himself.

What was not reported by the media is that they also launched their kick-ass theme song…

The Cult of Ibrahim Ali

If you’d like to sing along, the lyrics, in its full-color glory can be found in the full post...
(rock-along for racism, in the full post)

The Cult of Ibrahim Ali

Look into my eyes, what do you see?
Cult of Personality Ibrahim Ali
I know your anger, I know your dreams
I've been everything you want to be
I'm the Cult of Personality Ibrahim Ali

Like Mussolini and but not Kennedy
I'm the Cult of Personality Ibrahim Ali
Cult of Personality Ibrahim Ali
Cult of Personality Ibrahim Ali

Neon lights, A Nobel 4D Price
The mirror speaks, the reflection lies
You don't know that you have to follow me
Only you I can set me you free

I sell the things you need to be
I'm the smiling snarling face on your T.V.
I'm the Cult of Personality Ibrahim Ali

I exploit you still you love me
I tell you one and one makes three
I'm the Cult of Personality Ibrahim Ali

Like Joseph Stalin and but not Gandhi
I'm the Cult of Personality Ibrahim Ali
Cult of Personality Ibrahim Ali
Cult of Personality Ibrahim Ali

Neon lights a Nobel 4D Prize
A leader liberal speaks, that leader liberal dies fries
You don't know you have to follow me
Only you I can set you free

You gave me fortune
You gave me fame
You give me power in God's name
I'm every person you need to be
I'm the Cult of Personality Ibrahim Ali
(original lyrics by Living Colour, can be found here)

 Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Connecting The Dots

Technorati tags: , , ,

Image taken from EthanHam.com, hosting by PhotobucketWhen Walski was a wee lad, and just starting to learn how to count, one of the fun things he remembers doing was to play Connect-The-Dots. He's quite sure that you know the drawing activity Walski's talking about, right?

What he found fascinating was that the resulting image was often not at all what he expected when he started from the first dot. Of course, Walski doesn’t find them quite as fascinating any more – this is talking about when he was 2 or 3 years old, after all.

But it so happens that in real life, there are virtual dots that, when connected, form interesting mental pictures, too. These dots come in the form of events and sometimes organizations or people. And the resulting pictures snapshots of the reality around us.

The difference is that the images you find in real life, which in fact are hiding in plain sight, often times are more difficult to form. Among the reasons for this is that you don’t always know immediately what dots belong to which picture. Until it is formed in totality.

Now, if you’ve read this far, and think that Walski’s lost his marbles, or worse, is writing about kiddie activity books, now is probably a good time to tell you that there is a point to all this.

It all began one fine day with a question, and a hunch.
(unraveling the imaginary dots, and more, in the full post)

The perplexing question Walski had was this: how is it that all these Malay/Muslim rights NGOs have appeared out of nowhere? Ok, he’s not talking about the more established ones like ABIM, Pekida, PGSM or Perkasa. No, it’s the other ones that seem to suddenly appear, like mushrooms on a moist and fertile dung-filled field, whenever there is an issue pertaining to things Malay/Islam – real or perceived.

Why ask this question? Well, if you’ve ever had to deal with the Malaysian Registrar of Societies (ROS), you’ll know that it’s not that easy to form an association, much less an NGO.

And then there’s the fact that certain religious organizations, which by their very nature, don’t auger well for nation building, are tolerated and to some degree encouraged by the government. One that comes to mind almost immediately is Hizbut Tahrir Malaysia, part of the larger international Hizb ut-Tahrir, one of whose aims is to one day form a global Islamic state. The sovereignty of Malaysia, as it stands today, probably doesn’t fit into the grand scheme of all things Hizb ut.

In fact, so tolerated is this organization that they have been given a KDN publication number, or permit to publish its newsletters, sometime around September 2009 thereabouts. Issuance of these numbers comes under the purview of the Home Ministry, and according to Wikipedia, under the “absolute discretion” of the Home Affairs Minister.

Incidentally, the ROS also comes under the Ministry of Home Affairs. Coincidence? Hold that thought for a moment, because there are more virtual dots to connect.

The hunch that Walski had? Remember the Third Power Column mentioned in a previous post (on November 18, 2009)? Well, information has surfaced that puts the Third Power Column into perspective of the bigger picture.

About 2 weeks ago, a confidential e-mail purportedly from Mahaguru58, pro-tem head of the Muslim Bloggers Alliance (MBA), was disclosed in a blog called Perisik Rakyat®, by blogger Tulang Besi, who was kicked out of the alliance because he disagreed with the unpermissability for non-Muslims to use the word “Allah”. This same posting was published at Malaysia Today, which is how Walski initially got to know about it.

What the e-mail, dated February 14, 2009, reveals is quite interesting. The following is an excerpt (emphasis by myAsylum):

Assalamualaikum dear MBA members.

I was invited to a closed door meeting with Datuk Seri Dr. Hj. Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, Minister in the Prime Minister's Department and in charge of Islamic Affairs, Government of Malaysia day before yesterday at the Shangrila Putrajaya. The meeting took place at 9pm at a designated meeting hall in the exclusive hotel.

The invitation to me was relayed by Rocky Bru @ Ahiruddin Atan, President of All Blogs to discuss amongst many other topics, the problem being created by the publishers of the Malaysian Roman Catholic Magazine 'Herald' who remain obstinate in using the term 'Allah' to represent their idea of God in their Malay section of their Christian magazine.

Fellow blogger Nuraina Samad who blogs at http://nursamad.blogspot.com, the daughter of National Laureate, Allahyarham Tan Sri Samad Ismail, was also there and two other bloggers who wish to remain anonymous.

Also attending on behalf of the Malaysian Government's side was Dato' Hj Wan Mohamad bin Dato' Sheikh Abd.Aziz, the Director General of JAKIM, the Islamic Development Department of Malaysia, Dato' Hj Ibrahim bin Lembut, the Director General and Chief Syarie Judge of the Syariah Justice Department of Malaysia, Datuk Dr. Syed Ali Tawfik Al Attas, the Director General of IKIM, the Institute of Islamic Understanding Malaysia and other top officials of the Ministry (Islamic Affairs, Prime Minister's Department).

(source: Perisik Rakyat®)

There is, therefore, very good reason why Mahaguru58 asked, later in the e-mail, to keep the communiqué under wraps. It also explains why recent statements from Ikim and Jakim on the A-word issue have consistently slanted a certain way.

Assuming that what the e-mail reveals is true, there is, therefore a collusion between members of the government executive, government agencies, the Syariah judiciary, and Malay/Muslim NGOs – all now associated with the Third Power Column, a nebulous entity that Walski has had a hunch existed. It’s aim? To promote religious conservatism with the end-game objective of turning Malaysia into a different kind of nation than what our founding fathers intended in 1957.

More dots that contribute to the bigger picture: the organizations that have been most vocal in the recent A-word issue – the Malay/Muslim NGOs and UMNO, or at the very least, prominent individuals within the party.

So what’s the picture that the dots, once connected, reveal? Personally, after thinking about it for a bit, Walski thinks that there’s actually more than just one picture, convoluted as these resulting images may be.

There are, in fact, at least two pictures – the first is that there is a concerted effort to eventually turn Malaysia into an Islamic theocracy, kind of like what’s happened in Acheh. But this possibility is not really feasible today because of one very important document, which stands in its way – the Federal Constitution. Enter Zulkifli Noordin, who during the last session of parliament intended to table amendments to the Constitution (via The Malaysian Insider), which would help pave the way. This is all part of the Third Power Column theory, which Walski has mentioned in the past.

Speaking of, yesterday, Walski posted a poll borrowed from The People’s Parliament having to do with Zulkifli Noordin. The result so far is close to unanimous – PKR should give the guy his walking papers.

The second emerging picture is that the Third Power Column, already in existence for quite a while, is being used as a tool by UMNO to help the party regain the political ground it lost during the last General Election in 2008, purportedly in the name of Islam. But things done for the sake of political expediency, no matter for what overt reasons, often have effects that last longer than intended. And sometimes these effects are not at all desired, nor anticipated.

The “support” given by the government and its agencies emboldens the Third Power Column. The action of the government in tolerating the post-Friday prayer protests is consistent with the theory that these organizations are being used for the ultimate aim of power consolidation.

Fine and well if the real objectives of UMNO are not achieved. But if UMNO succeeds, then the empowerment given to the various individuals and organizations can’t be yanked back overnight, lest UMNO loses its credibility with the column. The illusion of empowerment, however, is taken as license, and over time, gains momentum.

Once that momentum reaches a tipping point, it’ll be difficult for anyone to pull back the reins. Perhaps that’s why UMNO is so adamant on wanting to ensure that the Internal Security Act (ISA) remains on the books, as an escape clause should the shit really hit the fan.

Already, signs of this momentum are showing – interfaith dialogue is now being promoted by many parties, individuals in government included, as a means to amicably solve the A-word non-issue that’s become so contentious. As we saw in the 4-part Mahaguru58 video interview with Zul Noordin in yesterday’s posting, interfaith dialogue is something the Third Power Column is against, alluding that it will lead to bigger “demands”.

Whether or not Zulkifli Noordin is acting based on his own principles, or is being used as a tool by UMNO, either knowingly or otherwise, is left to be seen. It all depends on what PKR decides to do, and what Zul Noordin does after that.

The situation we have today is not something that happened overnight. Rather, it is the result of numerous events that have happened sporadically over the last decade or so, occurring out of political expediency, without much regard for long term effects that we are now witnessing – numerous hurried amendments to the Constitution, the “declaration” of Malaysia as an Islamic country, the demolishing of the judiciary as an independent institution, the civil service and government agencies becoming partisan, erosion of civil liberties – to name some that come to mind. These, further compounded with more recent events like what was described in the e-mail excerpt above.

And for what? All for the sake of short-sighted political expediency.

While the 1Malaysia concept may be an honest attempt to try to salvage what little social and national unity we have left, Walski can only describe it as trying to use a flimsy band-aid to treat an almost-severed limb. A case of too little, too late. Worse, with what’s happening on the ground, 1Malaysia sounds like nothing more than hollow sloganeering.

And that, folks, is the stark and ugly picture that the dots have revealed. Connecting the dots may have been fun and fascinating as a little kid when the images revealed were benign caricatures.

But the pictures that this recent connect-the-dots exercise has revealed… well, let’s just say that “benign“ isn’t a word that comes to mind.

So can you see what Walski sees, now that some of the dots have been connected?

He hopes that you do, because seeing the dot-obscured picture for what it is, is half the battle won, in Walski’s humble opinion...

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

Monday, January 25, 2010

Opinion Poll: Should PKR give Zulkifli Noordin his walking papers?

Technorati tags: , , , ,

Walski came across this poll, currently running at The People’s Parliament – “Should PKR sack Zulkifli Noordin?” – and decided that it’s important to let you folks know about it.

Then he thought – why stop there? And so, Walski decided to post the poll on this blog, too. You can find it at the sidebar, where all the surveys are usually placed.

Since Walski would like you make an informed decision when you cast your vote, it’s important to get to know Zul Noordin a little better, if you don’t already.

This getting-to-know-Zul lesson comes courtesy of a like-minded blogger with an ego bigger than his own good, Mahaguru58. Like-minded with Zul Noordin, that is…

The MG58 Interview (Part 1)

Still don't know Zul well enough? Wanna see/hear more of his "Islam-as-I-say-tion" paranoid “us against them” thoughts? Well, fret not, because there are 3 more parts to to this interview...
(more Zul than you could ever hope for, in the full post)

The only downside to this series of videos is that it’s conducted in Bahasa Malaysia. The other downside is that Walski doesn’t have the time to do an English transcript.

The MG58 Interview (Part 2)

The MG58 Interview (Part 3)

The MG58 Interview (Part 4)

Walski doesn’t know about you, but he thinks that 1hr 10min of Zul Noordin has been pretty much enough for him to make an informed decision.

To-date, as of the time of this posting, 3,893 persons have already cast their vote since the poll was released yesterday. And the result so far is not at all surprising, as far as Walski is concerned.

Well, what you waiting for? Vote already!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Poll Position: “Allah” for All

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

Without a doubt, the issue of who can use the word “Allah” is an emotionally charged one. What one could doubt, though, is whether it’s a question of theology, or if there are other agendas at play.

And when such a situation arises, you know that a myAsylum opinion poll can’t be far away. After a week, plus change, of running the poll, the results are in. This time around, the poll managed to get the opinions of over 4,100 persons. Not too shabby, if you ask Walski.

Click on image to view results via Polldaddy.com, image hosting by PhotobucketClick on image to see results at Polldaddy.com

Are the results surprising? Don’t know about you folks, but not to Walski. It reinforces his belief that the entire non-issue centers around something other than theology alone… 
(analyzing the results, and more, in the full post)

Apart from myAsylum, this poll was also picked up by RantingsbyMM, Unscientific Malaysia, and X-Blogs, plus a mention by Anas Zubedy (thanks bro!) – and Walski would like to thank them, again, for spreading the word far and wide. If you had run the poll, and Walski forgot to mention your blog or website, please leave him a comment. Truly, Walski is very grateful for your obliging to post the poll.

Walski had hoped more Muslims would participate, but he can live with the 27% – equivalent to 1,100 persons. Out of the 27%, 17.3% stated that they have no problem with “Allah” being used by anyone. This translates to roughly about 65% of participating Muslims (or 712 persons) – a majority, by any measure.

Which does make Walski wonder: exactly whom do the numerous (and mushrooming) Malay NGOs speak for?

Reading through the numerous opinions (on the Internet) of those who feel “Allah” is exclusively for Muslims, not one opinion successfully presents a solid theological basis for the exclusivity. These ranged from the assertion that Muslims worshipped a “different” God, to the oft-mentioned opinion that such allowance would “confuse Muslims”, to totally confused arguments convoluting religion and race.

Over the past week, Walski had two separate conversations with two Malaysian Muslims on what they thought. Both persons felt that it should be exclusive. What was interesting, however, was that both individuals had the notion that it was only recently that the Catholic Church was insisting on the use of “Allah” for God. Equally interesting is that neither one could really say with conviction that it was something actually theologically verboten. Contradiction, you say?

Yesterday, The Malaysian Insider published an opinion piece by  K. Anand, entitled “A letter to a Muslim friend". In it, Anand postulated that much of the opinions exhibited by Muslims promoting exclusivity, were based on flawed assumptions. Among them:

  • the insistence by Catholics on the use of "Allah" is something very recent
  • Jesus would also be referred to as “Allah” in Catholic publications
  • the Catholic Church chose to bring the case to court, when they should have chosen other “less provocative” channels
  • Allah” would also be used in the English version of The Herald
(source: The Malaysian Insider)

K. Anand’s piece provides an editorialized chronology (of sorts), plus some background information surrounding the issue, and it’s perhaps worth your while to give it a read.

One question remains, however: who’s been propagating strategic misinformation about the facts of the matter?

Another thing that Walski’s read is that the judgment by the presiding judge, the honorable Datuk Lau Bee Lan, was biased because she’s an “active preaching Christian”, further insinuating that “she has her own agenda (via Mahaguru58).

Walski will not comment on this, which he feels is tantamount to being in contempt of court. Instead, he urges you to read Datuk Lau’s judgment, which has been made available for download by LoyarBurok.com, and then decide for yourself. If you were to ask Walski, however, this accusation is purely based on sentiment and conjecture, without having even read the judgment. Or perhaps, caring to.

Also, numerous comments were left at the Polldaddy.com poll results page, incidentally. Apart from Walski’s own, a total of 50 comments, to be exact. Most of them were left by those who support the use of “Allah” by all.

Unless some new developments come up regarding this emotionally charged non-issue, this will probably be Walski’s last posting touching on the “Allah” debate. There are, in fact, many other more important issues, as opposed to this one, which Walski would rather focus on.

In any case, Walski would like to thank you for participating in the poll, and thank you once again to his fellow bloggers who saw it fit to re-post it on their own sites. Let’s hope this non-issue gets resolved real fast, because truthfully, folks, we’re just wasting too damned much energy on something so trivial, that God’s probably laughing real hard right now.

On the other hand, two questions raised in this post remain unanswered… so, we’ll see how it goeth.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

Thursday, January 14, 2010

HENN: World Insulation the "A"-word Controversy Solution

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

Malaysian Muslims to insulate themselves from the world 
myAsylum provides an exclusive report on the proposed final solution to the “Allah” controversy - reporting straight from Hell, and soon-to-be Hell-on-Earth, Malaysia. Another episode in the continuing series from the Hell-on-Earth News Network (HENN)

The recent controversy over the use of the “A”-word in Malaysia has highlighted just how fragile the faith and mind of the Malaysian Muslim community is. The fact remains that the unauthorized use of the “A”-word by non card-carrying Muslims will lead to the destruction of their faith.

But there’s no need to despair. Or think too much. The Coalition Of National Muslim Angry NGOs (CONMAN) has come out with a solution – totally insulate the Malaysian Muslim community from the world, a place deemed very dangerous to be in.

Abdul Ghabi Ahbal, head CONMAN coordinator, in an exclusive press statement provided to HENN, laid out the purpose and objective of this new faith-protection initiative.

Among the measures mooted included disallowing the unauthorized singing of state national anthems of Johor, Kedah, Pahang, Perak, Selangor, and Terengganu – all of which contain the “A”-word (via The Sensintrovert). How this would be enforced was not elaborated.

“Although many states have Syariah legislations prohibiting the unauthorized uttering of many exclusively Islamic words, like the “N” and “S”-words (via The Malaysian Insider), these are not easily enforceable since Syariah legislation has no jurisdiction over unauthorized persons,” said Abdul Ghabi in the statement.

So far, as a repercussion of the High Court allowing the Catholic publication, The Herald, to use the “A”-word in their Bahasa Malaysia edition, at least 8 Christian houses of worship had been fire-bombed, and one Sikh temple vandalized. Fortunately, due to the ineptitude of the fire-bombers (and the fact that gasoline still needs fire to ignite it), only one, The Metro Tabernacle Church in Kuala Lumpur, suffered significant damage. No claims of responsibility have been made thus far, and the government has assured the public that these isolated incidents will be investigated.

In the statement to HENN, Abdul Ghabi added that “a much more drastic program has to be put in place, in order that the fragile and easily confused minds of Malaysian Muslims are protected. Prohibiting others from using A**** in itself is insufficient, and more has to be done”.
(insulating Malaysian Muslims from the world, and more, in the full post)

The CONMAN statement clearly laid out the strategies required to protect the fragility of the Malaysian Muslims. Among them,

  • Prohibit the use of non-Islamic publications that contain the "A"-word, such as dictionaries. Since much effort would be required to black-marker every occurrence of the word, prohibition would be a more practical approach. Since the prohibition of dictionaries would also make it difficult to go to school, Muslims are also encourage to ditch school.
  • Prohibit the use of the Internet. The Internet, a bane of the modern age, has made the unauthorized use of prohibited words, like the “A”, “B”, “F”, “K”, “N” and “S”-words (among others) much less easy to police. Therefore, in order that the fragile faith of Muslims are protected, Muslims are encouraged to not use the Internet, and if possible, for the Malaysian Government to ban its use altogether.
  • Don’t Sing Problematic State Anthems. While it is unfortunate that the various states, namely Johor, Kedah, Pahang, Perak, Selangor, and Terengganu, didn’t have the foresight to realize just how precarious to the Muslim faith it is to include the “A”-word in their anthems, a stop-gap measure would be to prohibit the singing of these anthems. Discussions with the Akademi Fantasia to re-write these anthems are underway, but until such efforts bear fruit, prohibition is again the best path.
  • Restrict Unnecessary Media Access. Apart from the Internet, TV and Radio can also be sources of faith erosion. Therefore, Muslims are advised to restrict their viewing to RTM TV1, and to terminate their Astro subscriptions. Easy access to negative foreign news reporting can also be achieved. While these measures may produce short-term feelings of sensory depravation, the long-term benefits to faith protection is immense.
  • Promote Ignorance. Western propaganda has made the Muslims in Malaysia averse to ignorance, which in fact provides for enhanced religious bliss. Thinking for one’s self is something dangerous and only leads to critical analysis, which is detrimental to the well-being of Muslims in this country. Thinking, should therefore be left to those with the necessary qualifications (and certification, in the case of Selangor).

While admitting that these measures were, at best, stop gap, the CONMAN statement stated that a long-term high-tech measure was being formulated by the coalition.

Although in it’s preliminary stages of conceptualization, the statement indicated that the initiative, named eTempurung, would ensure that Muslims in Malaysia would be neurally programmed to be compliant individuals, utilizing electronic RFID chip implants with pain-producing algorithms that would automatically be activated if any non-compliance were to be detected.

However, independent preliminary investigations by myAsylum’s intrepid squad of Cybernetic Remote Autonomous Pararaoches (CRAP) have indicated that the eTempurung program was facing difficulties due to lack of technical information availability, sourced primarily through the Internet, which CONMAN have now prohibited for themselves.

The CONMAN statement did not indicate any timeline for the implementation of the stop gap guidelines, but in the closing paragraph, Abdul Ghabi indicated that it would be soon.

“The ultimate aim of these measures, to be implemented very soon, A****-willing, is to ensure that Muslims in Malaysia are sufficiently insulated from any unauthorized and dangerous knowledge and stimuli from the world around them. We have fallen far behind the efforts of faith protection – the only way to succeed in this world and the next – and are confident that our initiatives will one day put Muslims in Malaysia at par with their brothers and sisters in Afghanistan, Yemem, and Somalia, in terms of the strength of religious faith.”

HENN will keep a close one-eye on these developments, and on the progress of these insulatory initiatives. 
(© 2010 - Hell-on-Earth News Network)

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Champions of Fugly

Technorati tags: , , , ,

UMNO, it seems, wants to be the People’s Champion. And according to them, regardless of whom those Malaysian “people” might be. Not a surprising PR move, really – and some good PR is certainly what the party needs. Thinking about this over the weekend, Walski couldn’t help but recall another Champion from some years back.

The fugly champion, image taken from Cars++, hosting by PhotobucketThe fugly Champion - click on image to view source

The Juara really has to be the fugliest thing ever to come out of Proton. Which is probably why the vehicle, launched in 2001, was terminated only 2 years later. Nobody wanted to buy it, despite the advertising and promotion for the minivan.

The hazard of claiming oneself as a champion – of anything –  is that good Public Relations isn’t enough. You gotta live up to your claim. In a way, the Juara did live up to its name – it was hands down the champion of fugly.

But words and PR aside, what has UMNO proven itself to be a champion of?
(unearthing the true fugly cause of the People’s Champion, in the full post)

Okay, so they’re a champion of their own Malay demographic. But depending on who you talk to, even that’s kind of debatable, especially in the last decade or so. In fact, Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah, surprisingly still a member of the party, in his speech at the ISEAS Regional Outlook Forum 2010 last week, laments what has become of UMNO.

Umno started in 1946 as a grassroots-based party that commanded the idealism of my generation. After 1987 it was transformed into a top-down patronage machine. Party membership became a ticket to personal gain. The party attracted opportunists and ne’er do wells while good people stayed away in droves. For any organisation this is a death spiral.
(source: Razaleigh.com)

For Walski, to be Champion of the People means to champion causes that benefit all the people, and not just some select people. Take, for example, UMNO’s stand in the emotionally charged and blown-out-of-proportion non-issue of the use of the word “Allah”.

Umno’s position in the present controversy over the use of the term “Allah” by non-Muslims is an example. In a milestone moment, PAS, the Islamic party, is holding onto the more plural and moderate position while Umno is digging itself into an intolerant hardline position that has no parallel that I know of in the Muslim world. Umno is fanning communal sentiment, and the government it leads is taking up policy lines based on “sensitivities” rather than principle. The issue appears to be more about racial sentiment than religious, let alone constitutional principles.
(source: Razaleigh.com)

In other words, exactly what Walski has been saying all along, particularly in his previous post – that the issue is not one of theology, per se, but of communal sentiments. It’s nice to have one’s views vindicated from time to time, Walski tells ya.

Over the weekend, too, Walski was alerted to a blog posting by one Akhramsyah Muammar Ubaidah bin Sanusi, who is an UMNO member, and who happens to be the son of Sanusi Junid, a well-known UMNO politician, and one-time Chief Minister of Kedah (among other posts he’s held).

While what he wrote may not be the “official” UMNO stance, it does reflect the mindset of the party, or at the very least, the mindset of its membership. In refuting Marina M. (for not understanding and not representing the majority of the Malays), Akramsyah claims that the “Allah” issue is another chapter in the continuing denigration of the Malays, and says the decision by the High Court has “robbed” the Malays of the exclusive use of the word.

And for the Catholic Church to then venture down the silly path of robbing Malays of the exclusive use of the word Allah... Malays may be lobbing molotov cocktails at all churches indiscriminately, but this is only fair.
(source: Tangents: Restless Musings Of A Malay Mind)

What gives the Malays the right of exclusivity is never explained, of course. Even the Arab Muslims have never demanded such.

Give the article a read, if you haven’t already. To Akramsyah, and, by his claim of understanding the Malay psyche, the majority of Malays, the only resolution to this issue is to appease the Malays. Otherwise:

  • Malays will figure out that it is not just the fault of the churches, or the Christian heirarchy for robbing us of Allah, but the fault of all Christian congregations for letting their religious leaders continue to insult us.
  • Malays will figure out that now that they're in for a penny, might as well go for the pound by attacking Hindu temples for their original insults towards Malay communities by claiming the 'historical right' to build anywhere.
  • Malays will believe since many non-Malays were sitting idle by the side allowing Malays to be insulted, maybe they should be reminded to that they are condoning these insults.
  • Malays in organised mobs will turn on our leaders for being so limp in their defence of our rights.
  • By then it would be too late, as even intelligent Malays will figure out that as we're being accused of being racists anyway by the ungrateful children of 'Pendatang' in this country, might as be racists... the worst kind of racists...

It could very well be that this is just the opinion of one delusional UMNO member. And going by the comments the posting has received, that could very well be the case. But it does make one pause.

And in that pause, one may just ask this question: exactly who are the “people” that UMNO really wants to champion?

The latest development, and one that Walski finds disturbing, surrounding the “Allah” non-issue is what HRH Sultan of Selangor has decreed that the state government prevent the usage of the word “Allah” by non-Muslims, in order that the faith of the Muslims is safeguarded (via The Malaysian Insider, article in Bahasa Malaysia).

Disturbing, because the institution of royalty has been dragged into the picture, and in a way, the decree subverts the decision of the courts. And in the process, the feudal psyche of the Malay mindset comes to fore. Think about it though – apart from bragging rights, what exactly does not allowing the word “Allah” to be used by anyone who chooses to, achieve?

It’s no big secret that it has been UMNO, and UMNO-linked NGOs, that have been on the forefront of protesting against the High Court decision. It’s also glaringly obvious that the Government has been very partisan in this matter – not surprising, since the head honchos in government come from the same political party.

If anything, what UMNO has successfully demonstrated to be championing is the cause of perpetuating the Malay feudalistic, and sometimes fatalistic, psyche and mindset. No amount of positive PR can change that. Not even claiming themselves to be the People’s Champion.

Because, quite simply, they are not. Action, as they say, speaks louder than PR.

And when the action of late has been nothing short of fugly, that’s exactly the kind of “Champion” UMNO can ever claim to be.

Juara, indeed. 

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

Sunday, January 10, 2010

Poll Position Pit-Stop: Mid-poll Results & Some Analysis

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

This post is only partly about the poll that is currently running – it will also look at the issues surrounding this big fuss over semantics and labeling. Yes, that’s what it pretty much boils down to, Walski’s decided.

But first, thanks to all who have participated in the current Poll Position opinion poll, which asks your opinion about the usage of the word “Allah”. The response has been beyond expectations, truth be told. And for that, Walski has to profusely thank Marina M., Unscientific Malaysia, and xBlogBonology.com, for hosting the poll.

As of the time of posting, close to 2,500 persons have registered their opinion.

Results from Polldaddy.com, image hosting by Photobucket(click on image to view results on poll site)

It’s heartening to note that the majority feel the word “Allah” may be used for all, and not exclusive for Muslims. A further breakdown, however, is where it gets interesting. Of course, it’s not a really scientific survey, but Walski thinks that it does mirror the reality of how most Malaysians feel.

In any case, the poll will remain open until next Friday, so there’s ample time to register your opinion, if you haven’t yet.

Related to this issue is, of course, the attacks on the four churches (the fourth being the Good Shepherd Lutheran Church in PJ [via The Malaysian Insider]) in the Klang Valley yesterday. Which brings us to what Walski wants to focus on for the rest of this post – what are the REAL issues surrounding the “Allah” issue?
(delving into the issues, and more, in the full post)

On the surface, it would appear that the angst and agitation we are witnessing surround theology and religion. And that seems to be the argument articulated by most of those who are against the High Court decision pertaining to the usage of “Allah” by The Herald.

And that argument says, pretty much, that the word “Allah” is for the exclusive use of Muslims, and Muslims alone.

Image from Malaysiakini, hosting by Photobucket The problem with this argument is that there is enough scriptural and real-world evidence to suggest otherwise.

It wouldn’t be practical for Walski to include and rehash all opinions that have been voiced. He will, however, give you two contrasting articles, as examples.

The first is an article written by one Dr. Khalif Muammar, published at MyIslamnetwork.net (official website for PEMBELA, a coalition of Muslim conservatives formed to “defend Islam”), which attempts to present why non-Muslims cannot use the word Allah (emphasis by myAsylum).

The fact is that the word Allah even though it was used before Islam, it has been Islamized, the meaning of it is no longer the same as before. By permitting non Muslim to use it we actually doing deislamization. We are reverting the course which was done by our Prophet. Hence, we will be responsible for making more Muslim become confused. Professor Wan Mohd Nor says the context of Arabs and the Malay world is different, non Muslim in our land especially did not use the word Allah before this, there is no such word in their language before, in the original work they called it Yahweh, why not they call tuhan Yahweh. Therefore, it is evident that this issue is brought to confuse the Muslims. They wanted Allah become the name of other gods as well. The fact is that our God is not the same as the god of Christianity, their god can have son, it is a humanized god.
(source: MyIslamnetwork.net)

Nevermind that the argument closely mirrors the schoolyard-like “my Allah is bigger than your God” banter – a more important question is this: does this argument mirror reality?

In an article written in 2007, Dr. Farish Noor, whom at the time was in Cairo, had this to say:

What is most striking to the outside observer like me - though rather banal for the Egyptians themselves - is the fact that in all these celebrations ranging from Eid for the Muslims to Christmas for the Catholics and Copts the word ‘Allah’ is used to denote that supreme and singular divinity, God. Catholics and Copts alike exclaim ‘Masha-allah’, ‘Wallahi’, ‘ya-Rabbi’, ‘Wallah-u allam’, and of course ‘Allahuakbar’ day in, day out, everywhere they go. The coptic taxi driver blares out ‘By Allah, cant you see where you are parking??” as he dodges the obstable ahead. The Catholic shopkeeper bemoans “Ya Allah, ya Allah! You can only offer me two pounds for the scarf? Wallahi, my mother would die if she heard that! Ya-Rabbi, ya-Rabbi!”
(source: The American Muslim)

Back to the Dr. Khalif Muammar article for a bit – the opening paragraph states something very important:

There is no nas qat’i (conclusive/definitive evidence) from the Qur’an and the Sunnah on this matter. All the evidences put forward by those who permit it, do not show that it is permissible for non Muslim to use the word Allah. Since there is no conclusive evidence from the Qur’an and the Sunnah, this matter falls under zanniyyat, something which is based on human discretion. Muslim scholars need to base their argument on historical, epistemological, theological and semantic analysis. There will be right and wrong opinions depend on who has the strong argument. Definitely wisdom and in-depth analysis must be stressed, and not just literal interpretation. Although there is no conclusive evidence this does not mean that we cannot reach certainty in dealing with this issue.
(source: MyIslamnetwork.net)

By Dr. Khalif’s own admission, then, it’s up to “human discretion”. And if you read the entire article, it becomes clear that PEMBELA has made up their mind that the word “Allah” is exclusively for Muslims – at their discretion. And yes, the standard-issue arguments against liberalism, of “confusing Muslims” and blaming the West, are all thrown in for good measure.

Even more precarious is the suggestion that Muslims and Christians (plus everyone else) worship different gods. And for a Muslim, that is a very slippery slide of a path to take. But that’s a theological dead horse, in his opinion, and one which Walski has no intention to flog any further in this post.

So, it’s pretty clear there is no scriptural evidence to suggest that non-Muslims cannot use the word “Allah”. And since “Allah” is, after all, an Arabic word, and is used in the Middle East by just about all Arabs, what really is the big deal?

The answer, he thinks, lies in a very honest and telling blog post, written by Sakmongkol AK47, a blogger whom Walski has a lot of respect for. The following are excerpts from a posting on January 3, 2010, entitled “O Allah, is this our fin de siècle?”. Walski has chosen these excerpts because he feels that these are at the core of the real issue surrounding the agitated response to the High Court decision, and the subsequent angst amongst many Malaysian Muslims (emphasis by myAsylum).

In the Malaysian context, Allah has always been the god of Islam. Whose religion is this? It is the religion of the Malays. It is the religion of 15-16 million Malaysians as opposed to the religion of between 850,000 to 1 million Catholics. The judgment offends the sensibilities of 15-16 million people. It is causing much grief and resentment.

Is victory over the usage of the word Allah here in Malaysia, a form of satisfaction-giving retribution to the Malays? To the triumphalists, this legal victory is one form of saying FU! right into the face of the 'stupid' Malay?

                                                  ------ // ------

Indeed, Islam and Malay are synonymous. A Malay is defined as one who speaks the Malay language, practices Malay culture and adopts Islam as his religion. Hence when you make judgment on Allah which is the god of Islam here in Malaysia, you are also judging on the Malay. By taking over the term Allah, what have you done?

You take over the very being of a Malay.

                                                  ------ // ------

You do that at what costs? Has the judge applied her mind on the costs that may arise out of this judgment? At the end of the day, this victory savored by the Catholics here in Malaysia, may in fact be just a Pyrrhic or Cadmean victory.

It is simply incredible to expect 16 million Malay Muslims to tolerate that decision. You may say the word Allah has been used for the last 400 years and what not. Or you may even say, just to win points in an argument, that Arabs don't have issue with the usage of the term Allah by non Muslim Arabs. But we are not in the Middle east and thankfully so. We are in Malaysia where we must learn to accept reality.

                                                  ------ // ------

The reality is the court ruling is perceived as a direct challenge and affront to the sense of Muslim. Malays cannot understand the insistence that Catholics be allowed to use the term Allah when referring to their god. In practice, Allah has always been associated with the religion of Islam and to read some esoteric meaning into it so that it can be treated as a universal term by Christians here is simply wrong.

It is wrong because it will be interpreted as designed to cause offense to Muslim sensitivity. We can't expect 16 million Muslims to sit idly by and accept the ruling without coming up in arms. Do Catholics in Italy, France refer to God as Allah?

(source: Sakmongkol AK47)

So, there you have it – the issue has little to do with theology, but with the Malay psyche. Right or wrong, as far as Islam is concerned, is almost irrelevant. To further support this assertion, one need not look further than to analyze which political bodies and NGOs are the ones that have been most vocal in their objection against the High Court decision.

Image from The Malaysian Insider, hosting by PhotobucketPost-Friday prayer protest in Shah Alam
(click on image to read The Malaysian Insider report)

It is all revolving around communal politics, folks. Islam is once again being used as a convenient tool to smoke-screen other agendas. The saddest part is that many Malay/Muslims don’t realize this, and have allowed themselves to be swayed, thinking it’s all about religion, and nothing else but religion.

In this particular case, it’s to protect the “Malay psyche”. But it’s a psyche that refuses to adapt to changing times and circumstances. It’s a psyche that has been way too protected, to the point of being detrimental to its own good. It’s a psyche that’s constantly being bombarded with incessant fear, some of which, in turn, embeds itself permanently.

And in the final analysis, this protection serves one important purpose – keeping a certain demographic trapped in their status quo, with no hope for real and meaningful change.

Azmi Sharom, a columnist and law professor at Universiti Malaya, told Al Jazeera that "the unrest is not surprising because of the fact that the government has been pandering to these kinds of people for a long time".

He said the government allowed some groups to protest when others were banned because the main ruling Umno party - which depends on the Malay/Muslim demographic to remain in power - was "unwilling to do anything which would seem to go against what they think is the Malay/Muslim desire".

"This is a noisy demographic and it is potentially dangerous for Umno to alienate them, so this will be a real test for Najib's administration," he said.

(source: Aljazeera)

And there is one other final reason why Walski thinks that it’s more about communal politics, than about religion – the fact that knowing very well the misfortune that had befallen their fellow Malaysians, the NGOs decided to go ahead with their protests yesterday, after the Friday congregational prayers. This, to Walski, was an act of sheer insensitivity and selfishness.

And such insensitivity has no part in the Islam that Walski knows. Regardless of what Awang Selamat, or the likes of Ibrahim Ali, may want you to believe. And while the NGOs have offered to provide protection to the churches (via Malaysiakini), the impression Walski gets is that this offer is not out of sincerity, but more out of guilt – it would’ve made a world of difference had you decided to call off the protests.

To the Christians in Malaysia, in particular the Catholics, Walski salutes your perseverance and patience, in light of the attacks carried out on your houses of worship. You could have very easily retaliated with force. Instead, you retaliated with prayer and forgiveness. And that is a valuable example for all to learn from.

It makes Walski wonder, what would the response have been if the tables had been turned, and mosques were the target instead.

To all Malaysians reading this, particularly the Muslims, there has been a petition started by Marina M. asking that you condemn any violent acts against peoples of other faiths. It is also heartening to note that 110 NGOs and 3 political parties have come out to unconditionally condemn the act of violence against the churches this week (via Aliran, HT to Anil Netto). Malaysiakini reports that the number of endorsees now stands at 121, as of last night.

After all, regardless of our heritage and beliefs, we are all passengers on this mothership called Malaysia.

"The lamps are different but the Light is the same"
Rumi

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

Friday, January 08, 2010

Poll Position: The ISA

Technorati tags: , , , ,

Usually, Walski publishes these results first before putting up another poll. This time around, however, we’ve had to change the plan a little. In any case, on December 25, a few newspapers published reports about the coming changes to the Internal Security Act, more ominously known as the ISA.

Berita Harian took it another notch and said that “Everybody Agrees ISA to remain” – hence, the poll to determine whether that was an accurate interpretation or not. Well, here are the results.

Poll results from Polldaddy.com, image hosting by Photobucket

And it appears that Everybody in this case only accounted for about 8%.
(a brief analysis, and more, in the full post)

Ok, there are two ways that we can look at the results. The first is that we look at how many would like the ISA to remain. We can roughly surmise that this figure amounts to 34% (adding 26% and 8%). That still leaves 66% – the majority – who think that the ISA should be repealed altogether.

The second way to look at it is this: only 8% want the ISA to remain, stating that it’s the only way to maintain national security. If you ask Walski, though, he’d be more concerned about the fact that jet engines could have been stolen from an airbase – now that is a more serious security concern.

Either way, the majority of those who participated do not want the ISA, in the form it is today. So, how the heck could that account for “Everybody”? Simply put, it doesn’t, and Berita Harian was merely exercising its editorial license, based on their own organization agenda. Because if you had read the English press, what the “experts” felt was that while a law like the ISA was needed, it’s form needed change.

That, however, is probably arguable.

In any case, rather than speculating what the proposed amendments are gonna look like, Walski chooses to wait until those amendments are tabled in Parliament. While ideally he would like to see the law (and a few other ones, too) repealed, Walski realizes that the stark reality is that a snowball has a better chance of surviving in Hell, than for the ISA to be repealed, as long as the current government is in power.

The most that we can realistically expect, therefore, are amendments that will hopefully remove any possibility of abuse.

Last but not least, Walski would like to thank Marina M. who was kind enough to host this poll on her blog, in addition to it being here, and on the Polldaddy site. Without her support the participation wouldn’t have been as much – a total of 392 votes were cast during the week period the poll was up. 

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

2Tongues, 1CONDEMNATION

Technorati tags: , , ,

Update @ 1248hrs: The Star has reported that a third church, the Life Chapel Church (located in Section 17 PJ), was also the target of attack. The report stated that a molotov cocktail was found on the porch of the church at 8:30am this morning. This, to Walski, indicates that these were not random attacks, but something that was likely to have been planned – but by whom?

Original Post:
This is what Walski considers an unplanned post, but one that needed to go out, post-haste. It is in both English and Bahasa Malaysia (in the full post), and it concerns a needless act of violence that took place last night.

A Statement Of Condemnation
myAsylum joins the voices of all peace-loving Malaysians in strongly condemning the attack on the Metro Tabernacle Church, in Desa Melawati, Kuala Lumpur, early this morning.

While no one has claimed responsibility, it is strongly believed that this act of wanton violence and disrespect has to do with the recent High Court decision in lifting the ban by the Home Ministry on the Catholic publication The Herald from using the word “Allah” in the Bahasa Malaysia version of the publication.

Regardless of who is responsible, there is no justification, religious or otherwise, to carry out such needless acts, which will only heighten tensions, and cause further disharmony.

This fire-bomb attack MUST be strongly condemned by ALL Malaysians, regardless of creed. 
(the Bahasa Malaysia version, and more, in the full post)

Sebuah Kenyataan Kutukan
myAsylum, menyertai suara semua rakyat Malaysia yang mencintai kedamaian, mengutuk dengan sekeras-kerasnya tindakan serangan ke atas Gereja Metro Tabernacle, di Desa Melawati, Kuala Lumpur, awal pagi tadi.

Sungguhpun belum ada mana-mana pihak yang mengaku bertanggung-jawab, adalah dipercayai tindakan ganas serta tak beradab ini ada kaitan dengan keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi tempoh hari, berkenaan dengan penarikan balik larangan penggunaan perkataan “Allah” ke atas versi Bahasa Malaysia The Herald oleh Kementerian Dalam Negeri.

Tidak kira siapa pun yang bertanggung jawab, tidak ada alasan, baik dari segi agama atau sebaliknya, untuk melakukan perbuatan seperti ini, yang hanya akan menambahkan ketegangan, dan memudharatkan situasi harmoni antara kita semua.

Seharusnya, tindakan serangan bom api ini MESTI dikutuk oleh SEMUA rakyat Malaysia, tak kira apa agama yang dianuti, dengan sekeras-kerasnya.

~ ~ ~ o O o ~ ~ ~

Walski hopes that all Malaysians joins myAsylum in condemning this cowardly act of aggression and violence. And if you wish to use the text from the above statement, in either language, please feel free – you have Walski’s no-strings-attached permission.

He also found out later that The Church of the Assumption in Petaling Jaya also faced a similar attempt, but fortunately the homemade explosives thrown into the church did not explode, as reported by The Malaysian Insider.

Let’s also not speculate as to who the responsible party might be, even though we have our suspicions, based on recent events and statements. That approach is pointless.

The bottom line is this: the act must be condemned by all Malaysians. Period.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

Sunday, January 03, 2010

Opinion Poll: What's in a name?

Technorati tags: , , , ,

More about the results of the previous poll in a later post – this new poll’s gotta be released first. Priorities, ya know?

For reasons that are obvious (to Walski at least), the oft-overused Shakespearean line immediately comes to mind.

"What's in a name? That which we call a rose By any other name would smell as sweet."
(Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet, Act II Scene ii)

Screenshot of latest poll, hosting by Photobucket And the name that’s being debated is “Allah” – the God, in Arabic, whose use to many Malaysians, is synonymous with Islam.

The debate over who can and cannot use this word, recently resurrected itself after the December 31, 2009 court decision in favor of the Herald, allowing the use of the word “Allah” in it’s Malay language section.

The judge in that case ruled “that usage of the word was constitutional as long as the periodical was confined to educating the followers of the Christian faith(via The Malaysian Insider).

This decision, needless to say, has not been well-received by the defenders of Islam in Malaysia. And the arguments most used are that allowing anyone else other than Muslims to use the word will “confuse the Muslims”, and that it is “an affront to Islam”.

And so with the scene set, Walski figured that it was time to unleash another opinion poll, located at this blog’s sidebar, or at this site.

Knowing that the reader demographic of myAsylum tends to lean towards the liberal, Walski has a big favor to ask you – let the more conservative amongst us know about this poll, and ask them – politely – to voice their opinion. 
(spreading the word far ‘n wide, and more, in the full post)

There are a few ways you can help spread the word:

  • simply tell folks you know - never underestimate the power of word-of-mouth
  • direct them to this blog post
  • if you have a Blogger-based blog, embed the poll in your own blog sidebar (click on the button you see immediately underneath the poll. Note, however, that the widget is only for Blogger based blogs. If you’re blog is on a different platform, let Walski know and he’ll send you the codes. Alternatively, go to the polling site (at Polldaddy.com), where you can find an embed code (but he’s not sure how well that one works, ‘cause he’s never tried using it)

The poll will remain open until midnight on Friday, January 15, 2010. Regardless of what happens between now and then, it’s important that your opinion is heard. Or seen, as the case may be.

Not to skew the result of this poll, but as far as Walski is concerned, this is a very emotionally charged non-issue. And one that is being exploited for political reasons, more than anything else – even the so-called religious reasons actually have their roots in politics.

In any case, for or against, Walski looks forward to your opinions…

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

Saturday, January 02, 2010

2010 - A Continuing Odyssey

Technorati tags: , ,

Before he gets too carried away, Walski would like to wish one and all a very happy New Year to myAsylum readers wherever they may be – even if it’s not quite 2010 yet where you are.

Happy New Year 2010, image hosting by Photobucket

Fellow-blogger Rapera, in his welcome-2010/goodbye-2009 post asks us an important question:

Is the year “new” or will we be “new”?

Pondering on this for a bit, what has changed about your world when you woke up to 2010 this morning?

As far as Walski can tell (from not suffocating and keeling over), the air in his world is still 78.084% Nitrogen, 20.948% Oxygen, 0.934% Argon, 0.031% CO2, and 0.03% dan lain-lain (give or take). By volume, that is. Exactly like it was in the old year.

So just what is so new about the New Year?
(what Walski would & wouldn’t like to have in 2010, and more in the full post)

Well, physically, not a thing. As Rapera aptly hinted, it’s us that changes with every year, and not the year itself. And so, whatever Walski wants in this new year – and for that matter what anyone else does – will depend on human factors that have nothing to do with the movement of time.

But let’s not belabor this point to death – Walski knows, as he knows you know, that the “new year” is but a point of reference that we give, within a system we practice, so as to be able to describe past/present/future events more precisely. So that instead of having to say “four hundred and thirty seven days ago”, we can simply say October 21st 2008. There’s absolutely no significance to this date, by the way, except that it was a Tuesday.

In any case, there are a few things that Walski would like to see happen this year. And some that he’d like a lot less of. And even some he’d like to see gone forever.

Realistically, much of what Walski wants he has no control over, and will require change in other people and institutions. One can still hope, no?

First, here are what Walski would like less of:

Politics – Ever since the run-up to the March 8, 2008 General Elections – almost 2 years ago now – Malaysia has been caught up in this perpetual, never-ending spin-cycle of politics. It’s long past the point of being tiresome – Walski finds it fucking irritating. To the max. And before you go screaming “Opposition sympathizer” on Walski’s ass, he thinks that it’s the fault of all parties, not just BN. EVERY-fucking-BODY. So, here’s some unsolicited advice that Walski would like to impart: stop with the politics, and get down to doing some real productive shit. Both to BN and to PR. To BN, you did badly during GE12 – you know it, and we sure as hell know it – now get on with life and start doing the work you were elected to do. And stop trying to undermine the states you lost with coups and underhanded tactics. You wanna win them back? The next GE is the proper platform. To PR, Walski realizes that the reality of governance is something you are only now coming to grips with, and that the Federal Government is not making life easy. Just don’t forget one thing – we didn’t elect you so that certain segments of your coalition can turn this nation into a theocracy. You did real good in coming up with a Common Policy Framework – just make sure you keep to your word, and walk your talk. And if any of the politicians are closet BN/UMNO wannabes – let them go – you don’t need any politician that’s less than sincere in your fold (okay, a “sincere politician” does sound like an oxymoron, but you get Walski’s drift).

Moral Policing – Bad enough that Malaysia is a police state, let’s all make sure it doesn’t further de-evolve into a Moral Police state. Sometimes, Walski feels that the only gratification Moral Policing gives is in the creation of “criminals” – oh, and making sure that this life is as hellish as possible. That said, in this respect, 2010 got off to a great start.

Walski’s just glad the girl didn’t actually jump down, or fall off, from the building. Assholes. And to think that there are those who actually wish for more of this in Malaysia. Bigger Assholes.

The photo you see on the left is from a similar news report in The Star.

Worried about her precarious position, the officer asked her boyfriend to coax her.
(source: The Star)

Worried about her precarious position, or of your own fucking culpability, should something nasty have happened to the poor girl. And looking at the drop, she would have suffered severe hurt, or maybe even permanent death, should she have jumped, or fallen.

And if that had happened, would the authorities have been charged? The cynic in Walski thinks not – and if that’s the kind of Malaysia that some Malaysians want, and God-forbid manage to one day achieve, then it’s no country worth staying on in. At best, at that too is a real stretch, this sort of crap is best left for the burgeoning reality TV that we’re being bombarded with.

Reality TV Shows – Speaking of which, it seems as though almost every conceivable (and sometimes inconceivable) situation now gets turned into a reality TV show. It was novel for a while, but now it’s gotten to the point of being ridiculous. If some obese fuck needs to lose weight, fine. They should for the sake of their health. But they don’t have to make the rest of the world suffer along. Oh, but it inspires unhealthily fat people to lose weight, you say? Look at it this way – if the mirror in your house, and snickering behind your back, is not inspiration enough, then a reality TV show probably isn’t going to, either. Come to think of it – what of those who get eliminated from the show along the way? Are they Bigger-than-Biggest losers? And if Moral Policing escapades in Malaysia were to be turned into Reality TV (shudder), can we name the program Even Bigger Than the Bigger-than-Biggest Loser?

Racism – Let’s face it – an entire system that was built, over the last half a century, along racial lines is not something that will be easy to dismantle. But that doesn’t mean that it should be further encouraged, either. What kind of superiority can one claim, when in the same breath one says that they’re in perpetual need of preferential treatment, or for thinking anyone owes you a living? And by the way, it’s time we came to grips with the fact that Malaysia (plus Malaya & the Malay Archipelago before that) has always been a melting pot, and that almost EVERYONE’s forefathers was, at one time or another, a pendatang. No insult intended – even Walski’s proud of his pendatang heritage. Why settle for bland ketupat, when it’s so much tastier with a variety of sauces?

Environmental Damage – Regardless of what your opinion is on Global Warming, one thing you’ll have to admit is that we (as in humans) are responsible for a lot  of damage to the environment, in the process of this thing called development. The horrendous landslips at Highland Towers and Bukit Antarabangsa were not “acts of God” per se, but the repercussion of hill-cutting, natural foliage removal, and the subsequent erosion, as a result. Mother Earth is a self-regulating closed system of gigantic proportions – imbalance of something will cause a shift in something else, as the system regulates itself. Take Carbon Dioxide, for example – the fact that it continues to hover around 0.03% (by volume) in the air we breathe is a clue that the excess CO2 that we spew into the atmosphere (and don’t say we don’t) had to have gone somewhere. The fact that we also keep cutting down natural nocturnal CO2 ingestors – tress, to you and Walski – is an added pressure to the environment to regulate itself. Hence, increased acidity in our oceans and groundwater, to maintain the fine balance in the air we breathe, between living, and keeling over gasping for air. It’s the simple principle of what-goes-around-comes-around. So yeah, let’s be more kind to the environment, shall we?

There are quite a few other things, too, like Stupidly Suicidal Drivers, Corruption, and Public Stupidity, which Walski won’t elaborate on. Otherwise, this post will be never-ending.

That said, there are a few things that Walski would like to see more of:

Walking The Talk – It’s important, just like Walking The Dog, which if you don’t do, will simply cause the accumulated poo-poo to one day appear in places you don’t want it to. And if the dog happens to be sitting by a fan when that time comes, the result might just be explosively messy. In any case, many promising things have been promised (for lack of a better word) – liberalization, 1Malaysia (in the true sense), etc. Well, saying is one thing – it’s time to put some action to those words. Otherwise, it’ll be another year of active sloganeering. Of course, the biggest stumbling block to political leaders’ aspirations is sometimes the members of their own political party, who may be a tad intellectually challenged to fully appreciate the true value of what’s proclaimed. It goes back to what Walski said earlier about doing the right things vs. politics being a popularity contest.

Acceptance – And not just tolerance. Tolerance, to Walski, merely means putting up with things you find distasteful. Like tolerating stupidity, for instance. Acceptance, on the other hand, is the wholehearted belief that others have the right to be as they are. No matter who these others are, or what it is they choose to be. We’ve seen some minor progress in 2009, and Walski hopes that he’ll see a lot more in 2010, and beyond. 2010 promised to be a good start when the courts ruled that no one community has the exclusive right to use ‘Allah’ (via The Malaysian Insider). At least, until the Court of Repeal has anything to say about it. ButImage hosting by Twitpic already, some Muslim exclusivst groups are up in arms over the decision. Including one former Selangor Chief Minister who says that he’s in mourning over the decision, and a Member of Parliament from the same political party who says that the decision will “stir racial tension(both news items via The Malaysian Insider). Not 'religious' tension, mind you, but 'racial’ tension. You really have to wonder how the exclusivist logic works. Or if there’s any logic involved to begin with. It’s almost like the age old playground taunt of “my God is better than your god”, when every Muslim knows that there’s only one god. It’s not like the Big Guy wears a name tag with ‘Allah’ written on it. So yeah, some acceptance of the fact no one religious/race community has exclusivity to God would be very nice for a change. And that’s acceptance, mind you, not tolerance.

Equal Access To Persecution-free Entertainment – And not a 1Apartheid situation where it’s a “crime” for one demographic to have fun (in whatever manner they like, as long as it doesn’t hurt others), and not a crime for everybody else. This really goes back to the No Moral Policing bit Walski already elaborated on earlier. Also, some lightening up on the “will bring about moral decay” rhetoric when it comes to entertainment would be great. Fine if you use that argument on corruption, but it really is a stretch when it comes to things which the young, and young-at-heart, regard as fun. And really, there is no “fun” in fundamentalism, no matter how tangled you try twisting your logic around.

Better Public Transportation – This, in fact, is related to Walking The Talk that was mentioned a few paragraphs back. Because so far, all we hear is talk. Talk, talk, talk. And while the poo-poo has already hit the proverbial fan, as far as KL is concerned on any given workday, it’s still not beyond the point of no return. The fact that Walski has greater hopes in Indonesia being socially more conducive to living (provided the fundies are kept at bay), it doesn’t mean he likes Jakarta traffic. And by Public Transportation, Walski means Public Transportation SYSTEM – not the piecemeal, not-very-connected islands of public transportation that KL boasts. Integrated? Look the damned word up in a dictionary before calling yourself that.

Civil Liberties – The broadening spectrum of civil liberties is what Walski hopes to see more of in 2010. We’ve been getting better in some respects, but much, much worse in others. The stunt pulled by the Government late last year of having stricter news censorship and obfuscation rules, in the guise of “self-regulation”, came under attack by the media bodies themselves. And now we’re hearing about new film censorship guidelines, to be introduced in 2010, of which Walski’s not entirely optimistic about. But he’ll give it the benefit of the doubt until the time it’s released, and (hopefully) open to scrutiny. Included in the spectrum of civil liberties is, of course, free speech, which unfortunately didn’t fare too well in ‘09. Again, Walski hopes for the best in the coming year…

To comprehensively go over every single thing that Walski would like more, and those that he’d like less, in one single post would mean that he’ll have nothing to write about for the rest of the year.

So, on that thought, he’d better stop here for now.

But in truth, this year will only reveal itself to be “new” if we make the effort to change ourselves for the better, and towards making what we want a reality. Many things, of course, are not entirely in our hands. Surprisingly, however, it’s amazing how even one small single action can have far reaching ramifications, whether we realize it, or not, at the onset.

It’s all part of the strange and mysterious continuum we call life, where 2010 is but another unfolding chapter…

Walski’s borrowed inspiration for post title creation acknowledgement footnote: Sci-fi buffs will probably have the suspicion that the post title is somehow related to Arthur C. Clarke’s “2010: Odyssey Two”. And you would be absolutely spot-on, if you suspected as much. Guilty, as charged.

Okay, so space travel hasn’t advanced as far as Clarke had envisioned 28 years ago when he wrote the Hugo Award winning book, and we’ve certainly not found any intelligent monoliths of unknown origin, nor come any closer to explaining the mysteries of life, the universe, and everything unexplainable. Not even why is it that some people find durians utterly disgusting.

But since it’s the only book Walski’s read that has 2010 in it, it became the natural choice of inspiration.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

Thursday, December 31, 2009

Zero-Nine Rewind

Technorati tags: , , ,

Wow… we’re actually on the verge of welcoming another new year.

Goodbye 2009, image hosting by Photobucket 2009 seems to have whizzed by in a long flash. It seems like only 360-some yesterdays ago that Walski wrote his post to usher in the year. Time flies, as they say – although the passengers on the Air Asia flight to Gold Coast a few days ago might disagree.

And now, it’s almost another new year, in less than 6 hours time.

It’s been a rather slow blogging year for Walski, comparatively, including a few near-miss attempts to quit altogether. No point getting into the specifics of why – rest assured that he will definitely continue with myAsylum for a while yet.

But there were a few blog projects that Walski had kinda planned, but didn’t manage to pull off this year, due to time constraints, the key one being a new blog dedicated to the Hell on Earth News Network (HENN) . Same with the stalled comic series Kaca’s Eyes – of which Walski’s only managed to churn out two strips in ‘09 – the plan was a spin-off blog for Kaca and Dewilicious. It’s something Walski’s been thinking of doing for quite a while. Maybe next year.

So, how did 2009 pan out, all told? Well, to put it mildly, it’s been an interesting year. But a lot of it for all the wrong reasons… 
(a brief 2009 retrospective, and more, in the full post)

Walski won’t be so ambitious as to try to recap the entire last decade. Many others have already done that, and there really is no point reinventing the wheel – unless you’re a die-hard Islamist who wants to reinvent the Islamic this and Islamic that

But 2009 has been a busy year for the conservative Muslim demographic in our country. In February, an attempt to quell the voices of our more progressive sisters in Musawah (see also here) was in high gear. For the more conservative Malaysian muslims, the established status quo must be upheld, even if its defense is the flimsiest of threads. Particularly when it comes to women’s issues, as evidenced by the many attempts at trying to silence Sisters In Islam this past year, including the call by PAS to ban the NGO.

And then there’s all those activities to ban anything resembling music and fun for the masses. Even something as mundane as Michael Learns To Rock came under attack. And you wonder why so many music acts opt for Singapore, Bangkok, or even Jakarta?

Perhaps all of Malaysia’s conservatives should take a leaf from what’s currently happening in Iran (which started the June elections, and has never really stopped since), or the continued tyranny that ordinary Saudis face – a theocracy, as good as it sounds in theory, does not work. Let’s not even mention the utter chaotic mess that is Somalia.

Will this realization sink into some people’s heads? Walski certainly hopes so – but only time will tell. It’s useful to see how others have failed, if for nothing else, to not make the same blunders.

The growing conservatism aside, one thing that underlined 2009 for Walski was tragedy – both on a personal basis, and also the demise of a number of well-known personalities, both locally and abroad. Like Yasmin Ahmad, for instance – a gigantic loss to the Malaysian film industry. Or Farrah-Fawcett, and more recently Brittany Murphy. The world this year, however, mourned on a global scale when one Michael Joseph Jackson breathed his last.

But the most tragic, needless, shocking, and incomprehensible demise in 2009 will undoubtedly be the death of Teoh Beng Hock, who was found dead under very mysterious circumstances, on the rooftop of the podium block, below the Shah Alam MACC office. A big media circus, and two autopsies later, we are no closer to knowing whether his death was accidental, a suicide or whether he was murdered. Teoh’s death created all kinds of reactions from civil society, the press, and the government, so much so that Malaysiakini named him their Newsmaker of 2009.

Original image from Malaysiakini, hosting by Photobucket

Teoh's death has been linked to the attempted coup to overthrow the rightfully elected Pakatan Rakyat in Selangor, alleged in a mystery letter that emerged a couple of months following his death.

Which brings us to something we simply had too damned much of in 2009 – politics. It seems like the politicking running up to the March 8, 2008 elections simply refused to stop running a whole year and 10 months later. So bad did the politics get in 2009, Walski literally became quite fed up. There was, of course, the infamous Perak Power Tussle, in which BN maneuvered a take-over of the state government. This pretty much became the shit icing on an equally crappy political cake, whose foul taste was left in many peoples’ mouths throughout much of 2009.

Whether or not well see a reduction of extreme politicking in 2010 is left to be seen, but Walski certainly hopes so.

And because the Internet was credited as one of the key factors in getting Barrack Obama elected last year, everybody wanted in on the new media bandwagon, including a very unnecessary website for Rosmah Mansor, the PM’s other ¾’s (she’s large and needs more than ‘half’). Well, a quick check at the site moments ago has revealed that it still defaults to the lovely fuchsia, and is no different (or better) than when Walski first blogged about it in August. Oh, and still with the unlinked buttons and the ‘Others Link’ pull down.

But the Internet was perhaps one of the few pluses about 2009, in particular, this application called Twitter, which really became big this year. Walski will admit that he only got on the bandwagon this year, too, but since hopping on board, he hasn’t looked back. And he blames Twitter in part for the dearth of blogging this year.

The nice thing about Twitter is that it’s compact, easy to take along with you anywhere (literally), and you don’t have to think beyond 140 characters whenever you have something on your mind.

In any case, Twitter became the new source of instantaneous information, putting another dent into the viability of traditional media in the new millennium. So much so that today, even the traditional print and online press organizations have their compulsory presence on Twitter. It is through Twitter that the world kept up with the aftermath of the Iran Elections – the insurgency that keeps on giving, until even today. And it’s also through Twitter that the shocking news regarding the collapse, and later, untimely death of Yasmin Ahmad spread through cyberspace like wildfire.

2009 marks the year that Twitter really exploded onto the scene, big time, not just in Malaysia, but across the world. Makes blogging seem so 20th century. But putting one’s thoughts across 140 characters at a time does have its limitations, and so blogging is not about to die off any time soon. Which is more than Walski can say about the traditional media.

But 2009 wasn’t entirely about doom, gloom and politics – we had some really fantabulous films that were released this year. No thanks to the fear that that Walski may blow hard earned cash to watch a butchered film on the big screen (assuming it makes it to our shores in the first place), he didn’t get to watch a number of films release this year. And so, courtesy of YouTube, and the creative genius of one Kees van Dijkhuizen, here’s a mashup of the years films.

This year also marks the 20th anniversary of the debut album, “Pretty Hate Machine” by Nine Inch Nails, one of Walski’s all-time favorite music acts. And finally Walski got to see them live in concert in August. Not here in Malaysia, of course, but in neighboring Singapore, during the Asian leg of Trent Reznor’s (supposedly) last tour. Walski has to thank The Lord Panda for making the encounter possible.

Now, he’d wanted to do a proper post on the concert, but one thing led to another, and so Walski never got to doing anything else but the one that was supposed to only be an interim post.

2009 was also a strange year in many respects. Walski won’t elaborate much, but friend and fellow-blogger Pah Nur, in her year close out, has brilliantly put together some of the strangest news items published this year, from around the globe. And that, inevitably, includes a couple from Malaysia, as well.

Truth, as they say, is sometimes stranger than fiction… and the truth is that this post is starting to get really, really long.

And so, as we anxiously count the hours, and later, the minutes and second, towards a brand new year, there are a few Thank You’s that Walski feels he has to make.

First and foremost, to the blogging community, particularly the Malaysia sector of the bloggerhood, for making 2009 an interesting year. And that means ALL of you bloggers out there, even the unscrupulous hyper-political ones, and the fervent & foaming at the mouth Islamist ones. 2009 wouldn’t have been the same without you. So thanks. Really.

Special mention, and thanks, however, need to go out to a couple of bloggers – Art Harun, in particular, for being the voice of reason in a sometimes unreasonable Malaysia. Marina M., is another blogger Walski wishes to thank, for her support for, and occasional linkage, to myAsylum – especially for her being so kind as to host the current ISA poll on her blog.

But most of all, 2009 would not have been the same if it were not for one very important person in Walski’s life – Mrs. Walski. Thanks, my dear, for being there, and for keeping Walski on an even keel. It would have been the real asylum for him, if it weren’t for the truly unconditional love of this one truly special person. It takes a lot to put up with Walski – he knows that, and for being there, thank you.

And so, as 2009 draws to a close, Walski wishes one and all a very Happy New Year. Don’t forget tonight’s partial eclipse of the Moon, 2010’s first wonderful gift to us all. Walski hopes that it’s not so partial that we don’t get to see squat.

Happy 2010 people…. see ya’ll next year!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Antares vs. The Plasmodium-bots

Technorati tags: , , ,

As most of us would’ve already guessed (and secretly hoped), it’s gonna take a lot more than a bunch of puny parasite bots to overcome the fierce warrior-blogger we all know, and love, as Antares.

Walski thought he should post some updates about Antares’ condition, which was reported on some days back. As he’s made the decision to not visit Antares until the guy recovers a bit more, Walski will relay some news he got via other concerned bloggers’ reports.

Beginning with Zorro Unmasked, which received a comment from Belle, daughter to Antares:

I just saw my dad and he managed to open his eyes and even smile!!!! Words can't describe how happy and relieved we are. He's got most of the tubes out and hopefully when we see him again later he won't need any tubes at all. The parasites have been wiped out and they're expecting him to be out of ICU within the next day or two. I told him that everyone is praying for him and sending him love. Thanks so much for all your healing and support. His 60th birthday on Jan 7th will be a day of celebrating his "re-birth" :)
(received in Zorro's comment box at 3:22pm yesterday)

Plasmodium falciparum is the parasite of protozoan proportions that causes Malaria. Nasty buggers they can be. But fortunately, not nasty enough to get a good man down, in this day and age.
(more updates, bloggers who expressed concern, and more, in the full post)

Another blogger, Hawkeye, posted a similar update yesterday.

Antares on the recovery and looking good!

Got news from our medical sources at about 4 pm today and was informed that Antares is recovering well.

For those medically inclined:
Was informed that he had "metabolic acidosis from kidney involvement of Malaria (Plasmodium Falciparum)". He was put on the ventilator and is currently being weaned off it, but still requires to have dialysis

But in general the information is that he is recovering slow and steady and that is good news to me.

Many folks, both online and off, had expressed concern about Antares’ condition, and it’s heartening to note that the man is on the mend. Quite a few bloggers have written posts of positive good wishes include Art Harun, Hawkeye (the above, and here), MarGeeMar, Mary Maguire, Masterwordsmith (here and here, chronologically), Patrick Teoh via Niamah!!!, and even Ku Li (via Twitter), among others. 

There was, however one sicko pseudonymically called Sister Stella who tried to spread a totally bogus story to say that Antares had passed on (see this Zorro Unmasked post). Not at all a nice thing to do.

It’s been a while since Walski’s personally heard of anyone contracting Malaria, but it just goes to show that some diseases, including an ancient one like Malaria, although not as prevalent as before, can still strike.

Them Plasmodium-bots are sure hard as hell to eliminate for good… bloody parasites.

In any case, thanks to all the positive thoughts, good wishes, and prayers that went towards Antares’ general direction. His family truly appreciates it, and I’m sure so does Antares.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

Sunday Tee-off

Technorati tags: , , , ,

If you’re a golfer and found this post thinking that it’s got to do with the game, please prepare to be utterly disappointed.

No, this post has nothing whatsoever to do with golf. Golf, as it turns out, is Walski’s handicap(that’s a lame golf joke, incidentally).

Original image taken from here

Nay, this post is about an article written by Dr. Ridhuan Tee, published in Mingguan Malaysia this past Sunday (PDF version), which was also posted on his blog. An English version of the same article can be found on Tee’s English blog here. The article, if you haven’t yet read it, scored a hole-in-1Malaysia (sorry, another lame-ish golf joke), promoting a blatantly racial agenda in how Malaysia should be, in Dr. Tee’s eyes.

Ridhuan Tee, is certainly no stranger to controversy, and is definitely not a medical doctor, in case you’re wondering (Politics & Government is his doctoral forte). Walski knows because (through Twitter) a lot of people were feeling sick to their stomach after reading the Dr.’s article.

But before we delve into the article itself, there are two excellent rebuttals to Tee’s article, which Walski urges you to read, if you haven’t yet. One, in Bahasa Malaysia, comes from Dengan Izini…™ entitled “Siapa Yang Jahat, Dr Ridhuan Tee?” by Hidayat Saifudin.

The second comes from none other than Art Harun, who penned “An Open Reply to Dr. Mohd Ridhuan Tee Abdullah”. A brilliantly written retort, Walski might add.

Needless to say, there probably are quite a number more, but Walski feels these two deserve special mention.

So what is it about Ridhuan Tee’s article that really got many people feeling they’d just encountered the wrong end of a 1-Iron to their gut? No birdies for guessing – it had to do with the ludicrous notions of 1Apartheid-ish race & religious relations numerical formulas, grave ornaments, and Santa Claus.
(the social contract, minus the santa claus(e), and more, in the full post)

As a precaution against being accused of not stating facts accurately, Walski will quote from both the Bahasa Malaysia and English versions of Dr. Ridhua Tee’s article. If you’re thinking of visiting the English version blog, though, be forewarned that Tee’s embedded some really cheesy easy listening music that you cannot turn off.

The article starts off with a kinda defense on behalf of Utusan – no big wonder, because that’s the vehicle he rides on for his writing. And as with any champion of the Malay/Islam cause, the Holy Grail of race-based politics, the Social Contract, is invoked early on (all emphasis by myAsylum).

Persoalan saya, apakah akhbar tabloid parti ultra kiasu dan parti-parti politik perkauman lain dan mereka yang bersekongkol tidak jahat? Parti ultra kiasu dan kuncu-kuncunya bukan sahaja jahat, tetapi terang dan nyata lagi berniat jahat dengan menolak kontrak sosial dan perlembagaan persekutuan serta mencabar perkara-perkara sensitif yang telah dipersetujui bersama sekian lama. Rakan sekutu parti ultra kiasu langsung tidak berani bersuara kerana takut hilang sokongan. Inilah strategi licik ultra kiasu dan sekutunya berselindung di bawah gagasan 1Malaysia untuk mencari laba dan keuntungan politik.

My question is whether the ultra kiasu party news tabloid and the other racist political parties and those concocted with them are they also not evil? The ultra kiasu party and its group are not only evil, but it is already clearly a fact that they have an evil intention by not accepting the social contract and rejecting the federal constitution and also challenging sensitive matters that have long been agreed upon. The partners of the ultra kiasu party do not dare to speak directly for fear of loss of support. This is the cunning strategy of the ultra kiasu party and its allies hiding behind the 1Malaysia concept for its benefits and political mileage.

Ironically, while accusing the anti-agenda papers and other ultra-kiasu political parties of cowardice for “not speaking directly”, Ridhuan tee neglects to identify whom he’s referring to exactly. In the same paragraph, no less. His own “cunning strategy”, perhaps.

Now, Walski’s no lawyer, but he’s dealt with enough contracts to know that there are none which are not subject to review, and are to be maintained for perpetuity, regardless of how circumstances change. Much less an unwritten contract. Art Harun, who is a lawyer, explains this in great detail in his open reply (from paragraph 5 onwards).

And then, it starts to get stranger.

Sekurang-kurangnya Utusan Malaysia berterus-terang, bermakna tidaklah terlalu jahat, daripada berselindung melakukan kejahatan, di depan orang pijak semut tak mati, tetapi di belakang bukan main lagi, seolah-olah hidup ini tidak akan mati. Inilah tindak-tanduk mereka untuk mengaburi mata rakyat. Kalau kita intip pergerakan mereka, saya yakin kita akan berjumpa dengan manusia yang sejahat ini, termasuk salah seorang exco yang membawa santa claus berjumpa pemimpin negeri mereka baru-baru ini. Kepada pemimpin tersebut, kalau suka sangat raikan santa claus, jangan sampai terlebih meraikan pulak. Sebagai umat Islam, kita diajar menghormati agama lain, tetapi elok berpada-pada. Mereka ini licik perancangannya. Ramai orang Melayu sudah tersasar kerana terlalu dekat dengan santa claus.

At least Utusan Malaysia is frank, meaning not too bad instead of camouflage doing evil, like being sweet in front of people but when behind actually are not. Those are their actions to obscure the eyes of the public. If we spy their movement, I am confident we will see their true colors, including the one exco that brought the santa claus to meet the leader of their country recently. To this leader, if you enjoy celebrating with Santa Claus, please do not over do it. As Muslims, we are taught to respect other religions, but do not go overboard. They are very cunning at planning. Many Malays have side tracked because of being too close to santa claus.

Bad English aside, the mystery of why the Malays have gotten sidetracked, despite opportunity after opportunity has now been solved – it’s Santa’s fault. Oh, the English version also upgrades Selangor to a country. Cool… Khalid Ibrahim must be pleased that he now has his own country.

Ironic, but while Tee fervently upholds the “social contract”, he totally dismisses the Santa Claus…

In any case, what Ridhuan Tee must have been referring to – in his not so direct, but still gallant way – is this image which surfaced a few hours after the release of his boundary-pushing article.

Image from @Dato8 on TweetPhoto, hosting by Photobucket

Yes, it’s Khalid Ibrahim partying with a badly disguised Santa, some bored-looking Santarinas, and a few state Ex-Co members. So, what’s so wrong with this happy celebratory get-together? Well, nothing really, if you asked Walski. But Ridhuan Tee probably has other ideas of how dangerous this could be to the faith.

But seriously, fear of a fictitious character? Wouldn’t that, logically, mean that the fear is kinda fictitious as well? Then again, that’s just Walski – who’s he to say, right? 

So, back to the article, the un-named, but obviously-referring-to-DAP, ultra-kiasu types are accused of bringing up sensitive racial issues to promote their own agenda.

Dalam memahami politik Malaysia, isu-isu perkauman dibangkitkan untuk mendapatkan sokongan politik dan pada masa untuk menyedarkan kaum masing-masing agar mereka sedar siapa mereka yang sebenar dan apa yang sepatutnya diperolehi. Manakala isu-isu sensitif dibangkitkan untuk mendapatkan hak sama rata dan sama rasa bagi kumpulan ultra kiasu. Mereka tahu perkara ini tidak boleh dibangkitkan secara terbuka kerana ia boleh dikenakan tindakan di bawah akta hasutan. Mereka sengaja mahu menguji UMNO yang ketika ini berada dalam keadaan agak tertekan disebabkan tidak mendapat majoriti dua pertiga dalam parlimen dan perpecahan Melayu Islam yang amat menyakitkan.

In understanding the Malaysian politics, racial issues were raised for political supports and to make the respective races to realize who they are and what should be obtained. Meanwhile, the sensitive issues were raised to demand equal rights and opportunities for the ultra kiasu group. They know these things can not be raised openly as they can be held under the sedition act. They deliberately want to test UMNO which currently is at its most crucial situation because of not getting two-thirds majority and also facing the painful disunity of the Malay Muslims.

Ok, so Tee’s a big UMNO sympathizer, a party which never raises any sensitive issues that are hurtful to others, right? Oh, but we have to forgive UMNO because they’re at a very painful ebb. UMNO, after all, is God’s gift to… well, Walski doesn’t know what, exactly.

Incidentally, not too long ago, when someone converted to Islam in Malaysia, that act was sometimes called “masuk Melayu” (loosely translated, converting to being Malay), because of the so-called societal expectation that once you’re Muslim, you must “become” Malay to be accepted. Of course, this is more perception than anything else, because there’s no such thing as racial discrimination in Islam, a point that’s highlighted by Tee himself. Or, does he?

Sebagai rakyat Malaysia, kita mesti tahu bahawa konsep sama rata dan sama rasa tidak menepati kehendak perlembagaan persekutuan, walaupun konsep Malaysian Malaysia yang selalu dilaung dan didesak oleh parti ultra kiasu. Ingat, agama Islam agama majoriti masyarakat negara ini. Kedudukan Islam begitu istimewa dalam perlembagaan. Jika ada ‘kelebihan’ pada agama Islam, ia bukanlah satu diskriminasi kerana selaku majoriti, Melayu Islam berhak, apatah lagi ia telah dipersetujui melalui kontrak sosial. Tidak perlu dipertikaikan atau dituduh tidak adil. Termasuk menggunakan dana-dana kerajaan untuk mengembangkan syiar Islam. Malangnya, perkara-perkara ini tidak pernah diformulakan. Akhirnya, setiap kaum atau parti menginterpretasikan mengikut kepentingan masing-masing mengikut latar belakang bangsa dan agamanya. Tidak ketinggalan perancangan jahat mereka.

As Malaysians, we must know that the concept of equal rights and equal opportunity do not fulfill the requirements of the federal constitution, although the concept of Malaysian Malaysia which is always being shouted and demanded by the ultra kiasu party. Remember, Islam is the religion of the majority community of this country. Islam has a very special position in the constitution. If there is any 'advantage' in Islam, it is not discrimination because as the majority Malay Muslims, they have the rights, let alone it had been agreed upon through the social contract. There should not be anymore questions or being accused of unfairness. These also included using government funds to develop the growth of Islam. Unfortunately, these things were never formulated. Finally, each race or party interpreted according to their interests respectively basing on the race and religious background. Not forgetting also their evil plans.

Now, Walski doesn’t know offhand which governance textbooks Dr. Ridhuan Tee studied to obtain his PhD in Politics & Government, but what he describes here is certainly not democracy – it’s majoritarianism, another favorite doctrine espoused by many in UMNO. The problem, according to Tee, is that there has not been a formalization of unequal rights for Malaysians. And with this in mind, we’re introduced to the Ridhuan Tee Social Formula.

Untuk mengelakkan daripada parti ultra kiasu ini menjadi bertambah jahat, setidak-tidaknya kita mesti menggariskan formula bagi menyelesaikan kejahatan ini. Formula saya adalah berasaskan kepada pecahan statistik agama dan bangsa di negara ini. Mengikut bancian tahun 2000, anutan agama rakyat Malaysia adalah seperti berikut 60.4% Islam, 40% bukan Melayu (22% Buddha-Toaisme-Konfucius, 9% Kristian, 6% Hindu, 3% lain-lain). Formula ini boleh diaplikasikan dalam konteks kehidupan bernegara termasuk hak-hak beragama dan sambutan perayaan setiap kaum, bagi mendapatkan keadilan. Formula ini menepati sebahagian maksud keadilan dalam Islam yang membawa maksud meletakkan sesuatu pada tempatnya walaupun tidak sepenuhnya.

In order to prevent the ultra kiasu party continues to become evil, we must at least outline the formula to solve this. My formula is based on the statistical breakdown of races and religions in this country. According to the year 2000 census, the percentages of Malaysians by religions were as follows: 60% Islam, 40% non-Malay (22% Buddhist-Taoism-Confucius, 9% Christian, 6% Hindu, 3% others). This formula can be applied in the context of the nationalization, including justification on the rights of religious festivals and celebrations of all races. This formula fulfills part of the meaning to justification in Islam which means to put things in its place although not completely.

Okay, this formula is great if you’re making pancakes, but if applied to governance, it will very likely lead to tyranny of the majority. Then, he goes to say that this is Islamic. And you wonder why Islam gets such bad press? This thing about how “justice” is not equality is another favorite among religionists, by the way.

Now because Utusan apparently has really sloppy copywriters, we are also made to believe that there is an additional 0.4% in 100% (go take a re-look a the BM version of the quote above. Walski did a straight copy & paste, by the way. Don’t believe him? Take a look at the PDF from the Utusan website. But let’s not belabor this minor faux pas, shall we?

The thing is that Ridhuan Tee almost laments the fact that the reality in Malaysia doesn’t fit his neat pancake social formula, attributing it to tolerance.

Atas dasar toleransi, formula ini boleh dikatakan langsung tidak diterima pakai, sama ada dalam bidang politik, ekonomi mahupun sosial. Misalnya, bilangan rumah ibadat bukan Islam melimpah ruah, perayaan mereka menenggelamkan perayaan orang Islam walaupun bilangan mereka sedikit. Lihat sahaja gedung-gedung membeli belah, walaupun Kristian hanya 9%, sambutan Krismas dan Tahun Baru 2010 menenggelamkan perayaan utama seperti hari raya dan tahun baru Islam. Kalau tidak percaya, lawatilah negeri-negeri yang diperintah ultra kiasu dan sekutunya serta gedung-gedung membeli belah sekutu mereka di seluruh negara.

Saya fikir, umat Islam di negara ini amat berlembut dan bertoleransi tinggi. Upacara perayaan keagamaan dan kematian begitu beradab serta mudah. Jalan raya tidak sesak. Kuburnya begitu kecil. Berbanding agama lain, sudahlah bilangannya kecil, kadangkala sehari suntuk jalan raya sesak ketika perayaan tertentu. Kubur-kuburnya begitu luas dan besar. Sampai bilakah amalan ini boleh diteruskan, di kala penduduk semakin ramai, tanah semakin terhad? Setakat ini orang Islam tidaklah bising sangat berbanding orang lain, walaupun kubur mereka semakin terhimpit dan protes daripada bukan Islam yang semakin berani apabila ada tambahan tanah perkuburan Islam.


On the basis of tolerance, this formula was not applied completely, either in politic, economic or even social. For example, the number of non-Muslim places of worship exceeded overwhelmingly, their festival celebrations actually drowned the Muslims celebrations even though they are less in numbers. Just look at the shopping malls, although Christians are only 9%, the Christmas and New Year 2010 celebrations are incomparable to the Hari Raya and the Islamic New Year. If you do not believe, visit the states ruled by the ultra kiasu and its allies and the shopping malls of their allies throughout the country.

I think the Muslims in this country are very tolerant and soft. Their religious festivals and funerals are well mannered and simple. Roads are not congested. Their graves are very small. Compared to other religions, which the number is already smaller, at times the roads are congested the whole day on certain festivals. The graves are so wide and large. How long will this practice be continued, whereas the population is growing but land is limited? So far, the Muslims are not that noisy compared to others, although their graves are narrowing and protests from the non-Muslims are increasingly bolder when there is an increase in Islamic cemetery.

One exception Ridhuan Tee conveniently omits is the road congestion caused by double, even triple-parked cars during Friday congregational prayers, which mysteriously go unseen by the traffic police. Yes, it is a Muslim’s obligation to attend Friday prayers, but does that make it an obligation to be a public nuisance – not to mention safety hazard – to others? What happened to being so tolerant and “soft”?

Now, Walski is pretty damned sure that in Johor and Pahang, the shopping malls are decked with Christmas decorations, just as they are in the states where the “ultra-kiasu” rule. If there’s anyone around the Johor Bharu and Kuantan areas is reading this post, Walski would really appreciate some perspective on his assumption.

But, let’s humor Ridhuan Tee for a sec – assume that the Islamic New Year is to be forcibly observed at the shopping malls – how exactly would the malls be appropriately decorated? Walski personally thinks that the last thing the Middle Eastern tourists would want to see is more desert sand and dromoderies. Similarly, on Prophet Muhammad’s birthday... On second thought, let’s not even go there…

The rest of the article goes on (and on) about graves, some more. Interestingly enough, he also lambasts Gerakan for insisting that the Grik parliamentary seat be given to them (from UMNO) to contest, which Walski thinks has something to do with the tussle between UMNO and Gerakan in BN’s Penang leadership arena.

Some people have commented that Dr. Ridhuan Tee’s writing portray him to be “more Malay” than your typical UMNO-phile. Which is really ironic, unless the doctor is actually a member of the party – something that Walski doesn’t think is the case.

Now, Walski hopes that this post is not misconstrued as being an ad hominem against Ridhuan Tee. It’s Tee’s ideas that Walski finds disturbing, and somewhat ironic at times – portraying the ideal of race supremacy, not-so-subtly disguised behind religious primacy, championing for an ethnicity that Tee cannot possibly represent, hard as he may try.

They say that a leopard can’t change its spots. And then you have Adidas that says “Impossible is Nothing”. Between the two, the doctor has gotten pretty confused, Walski thinks.

But at the end of it all, the biggest winners were probably the golfers – because inadvertently, they got a surprise Christmas weekend gift – a Ridhuan Tee.

Walski’s seemingly irrelevant picture-inclusion explanatory (somewhat) footnote: You may be wondering what relevance the first picture above has to this post. You see, Walski’s mind works in mysterious (and strange) ways sometimes. Suffice it to say that picture of the lovely teddy was taken during tea-time. Which is similar to what kind of time Walski had while writing this post...

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

Monday, December 28, 2009

Approaching Gaza

Technorati tags: , , ,

Yesterday, December 27, 2009, marked the one year anniversary of the beginning of the Gaza onslaught by Israel, purportedly in retaliation to Palestinian cross-border rocket attacks. The operation, which lasted for approximately one month, claimed the lives of more than 1,300 Palestinians, many of whom were women and children.

The UN Fact finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict released their report last September, in which they found that in many instances, Israeli forces were in violation of established rules of war conduct, and UN humanitarian guidelines and laws. The continued blockade of Gaza has made the territory one humanitarian nightmare.

All that you probably already know.

Image taken from The Star, hosting by PhotobucketThe convoy crossing the Syria-Jordan border
(image from The Star)

What you may not know about is the London to Gaza Convoy (via RantingsbyMM), organized by Viva Palestina, an organization that organizes convoys to Gaza to deliver food, medicines and other essential stuff.

But they’re facing a problem – not from the Israelis, but from the Egyptian government, which has not allowed them to use a closer route. 
(what you can do, and more, in the full post)

Walski received this in the mail last night, and it details the difficulties being faced by the convoy.

Dear all,

It has been one year since Israel's attack on Gaza that left 1,400 people dead, 400 of which were children.

Currently 250 vehicles laden with foodstuff and medical aid are on their way to Gaza. They started our their journey in early December from the UK, crossed Europe into Turkey, then Syria and now Jordan. In the convoy are 9 Malaysian vehicles - 4 from Viva Palestina Malaysia (formerly known as COMPLETE) and 5 from the Perdana Global Peace Foundation.

They are 4 hours away but are currently stuck at Aqaba, Jordan, as the Egyptian government wants to travel 500 miles back to Syria so as to approach Egypt from a different route and ask Israel for permission to cross from Egypt into Gaza through the Egyptian controlled Rafah crossing.

Tomorrow Malaysians will be handing over a letter of appeal to the Egyptian Ambassador, asking for safe, easy and quick passage of all vehicles through Egypt into Gaza.

Please show your support by joining us.

When - 12pm
Where - Egyptian Embassy, 12 Jalan Ru, Off Jalan Ampang Hilir, 55000 KL

Please pass this on to as many people as possible. Let not our efforts be in vain.

Regards,

Shazeea Banu

Medicine III, Monash University
Clinical School, Johor Bahru, Malaysia
Ph. +60166514543

The convoy in Amman Jordan, awaiting clearance to proceed
(image by @juanajaafar, via RantingsbyMM)

And in case you were wondering, yes, there are Malaysians taking part in this interfaith international convoy, among them, Walski’s Twitter-friend Juana Jaafar, who’s participating as a representative of the Perdana Global Peace Organisation (driving an ambulance, Walski’s told).

There are a few ways you can lend your support – apart from attending the letter hand-over today – blog about it (if you are a blogger), Tweet and re-Tweet anything to do with the convoy (for example, you can follow @juanajaafar who’s been updating her experience since earlier this month. Other Tweeterers you can follow: @ramgk, @pgporg & @GazaFreedom), or simply raise awareness by highlighting this to your friends & family. Or, you can write to the Egyptian government – politely.

While the Egyptian government is not outright disallowing the convoy to pass, what Egypt is asking is for the convoy to take a much longer route, adding another 500 miles to the route, approaching the Egyptian border a different way.

The convoy at the Jordanian border earlier on
(image by @juanajaafar, via RantingsbyMM)

Because of the many other things that have been happening, including Antares’ illness, Walski’s really been neglecting this very important and symbolic international effort for Gaza. This post is his attempt to make amends.

Equally as important is that it’s not about religion, being anti-anyone or pro-anyone-else – the Gaza disaster is simply a humanitarian disaster. Just ask former South African Constitutional Court judge Justice Richard Goldstone – himself not only a Jew, but a Zionist:

We accepted this Mission because we believe deeply in the rule of law, humanitarian law, human rights, and the principle that in armed conflict civilians should to the greatest extent possible be protected from harm.

We accepted with the conviction that pursuing justice is essential and that no state or armed group should be above the law. Failing to pursue justice for serious violations during any conflict will have a deeply corrosive effect on international justice.

We accepted out of a deep concern for the hundreds of civilians who needlessly died and those who suffered injury and dislocation of their lives.

We accepted because we believe that the perpetrators of serious violations must be held to account.

We do not claim to be immune from error. After the release of the report we have received a number of comments from people who are sincerely interested in the truth.

We have considered them and where relevant redressed inaccuracies in the final version of the report which is today before you.

We regret that the response to date of the Government of Israel avoids dealing with the substance of the report.

(source: Richard Goldstone's address to the UN Human Rights Council on September 29, 2009)

Humanitarianism transcends creed, culture and political ideology – remember this simple fact, and everything else will be nothing but useless noise.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

Sunday, December 27, 2009

On a wing and a prayer

Technorati tags: , , ,

Updated @ December 28th 1646 hrs: Got to know via Art Harun's Facebook page that Antares' condition is steadily improving. He quotes a message from one of the daughters: "Just saw my dad and he managed to open his eyes and even smile!....He's got most of the tubes out..... The parasites have been wiped out and they're expecting him to be out of ICU within the next day or two. I told him that everyone is praying for him and sending him love. Thanks ...".

Updated @ December 27th 2024 hrs: Latest news on Antares, taken from a comment posted by Zorro on his own blog, relaying a message from one of Antares’ daughters, Moonlake Lee. His condition is improving, but he’s not out of the woods, yet. See the comment excerpt at the end of this post.

Original Post:
Today, December 27th, makes it exactly one year to the day that Walski met Antares, Earth-spirit mystic, and keeper of Magick River (both the physical and online manifestations), for the first, and only, time.

It was in Penang, where Walski was spending time with the in-laws, and Antares was spiritually officiating an art show, where the image above was captured. Walski was given the task to fetch Antares from the art show, and to physically transport him to dinner, graciously hosted by Masterwordsmith and her lovely family.

Well, as you probably would already have heard, either thru Art Harun’s or Uncle Zorro’s blogposts, Antares is very ill, struggling to fight off an extremely bad case of malaria..

The little angel may be inanimate and made of clay, but it represents the positivity and good wishes that Walski’s trying hard to transmit, for Antares’ speedy recovery. 
(the cartoonist formerly known as Kit Leee, and more, in the full post)

Antares in healthier times, image hosting by Photobucket If you’ve ever met Antares, you’ll probably either like, or totally dislike, him. Very few people Walski knows have an in-between feeling for the guy.

As an activist, Antares is very passionate about how he feels, be it for the cause of the peoples of the land and their fast-disappearing culture and habitat, or for our nation, Malaysia.

That, and the fact Antares is a bit of an eccentric person. Which is okay as far as Walski is concerned, because he realizes that creativity takes many forms in real life. But probably not so comfortable for others.

Be that as it may, last Walski heard, Anatares is still at the Sungai Buloh General Hospital, suffering not only a bad case of malaria, but from renal failure as well, a complication that developed while he was hospitalized.

Those of you who know him personally will probably know that Antares is the current persona of a well-known cartoonist of old, named Kit Leee, author/artist of the Adoi! cartoons. Those of you born after 1990 may not have heard of Kit Leee, even though you know of Antares.

Everyone has a history, as they say…

For now, however, Walski hopes that you focus your positivity and good thoughts in the general direction of the Sungei Buloh hospital. So well-known and noticed is the man’s dedication towards a better Malaysia, it’s even gotten the notice of another notable Malaysian.

Get well soon, Antares…

Update
The following is an excerpt of a comment taken from Zorro Unmasked, by one of Antares' daughters (slightly edited for punctuation).

Hi Everyone,

This is Moon, Antares' daughter. My sister, Belle and I, would like to thank everyone who has showed concern and love for our dad. Thanks for all your concern

Our dad's condition has improved but he is still in critical condition and not out of the woods yet. Please keep up the prayers and healing wishes.

Please note that he is under sedation (i.e not conscious) and in a weakened state. The doctors have advised to limit visits to immediate family for the time being - this is to minimize risk of infection to him.

My dad would be happier to see his friends when he is able to interact with them - not at this stage. You are most welcome to visit once he is out of the ICU and in the normal ward.

My sis and I will post updates on his Facebook wall so you can check there regularly to see how he is doing.

Thanks again for all the love and concern. We appreciate it and we know Antares does too.

(source: Zorro Unmasked)

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

Saturday, December 26, 2009

Opinion Poll: Do the majority of Malaysians really want the ISA to remain?

Technorati tags: , , ,

For the first time in a long while, Walski’s on a roll with his blogging duties.

Poll is located at the sidebar. Alternatively, click on image to take the poll at Polldaddy.com - image hosting by Photobucket He’s got another poll up to gauge what the feeling in the bloggerhood’s like about a claim made by a senior politician, published in, among other places, Friday’s Berita Harian.

It was also reported by The Star, The Malaysian Mirror, and Malaysiakini, but without the same exuberance and gung-ho feel that the Berita Harian report seemed to have (download a PDF copy of the BH report here), basing on how they headlined the story: Everybody Agrees ISA to Remain (Semua Setuju ISA Kekal).

Essentially, our Home Minister held 6 meetings with focus groups, as reported by all the media bodies publishing the story.

The following is the version as published by The Star, dated yesterday, December 25th (emphasis by myAsylum):

Hishammuddin said that following the public meetings and discussions with the target groups, the ministry’s law review technical committee was in the final stages of studying all the views and suggestions before the amendments are tabled in Parliament.

He said he wanted the review to take into account the five main issues that had been identified as the basis of public dissatisfaction over the Act.

They are: the powers of the minister; duration of detention; the rights of and treatment given to the detainees; public perception that the enforcement of the Act was purely for political purposes; and detention without trial.

Hishammuddin said the Home Ministry had held six meetings with representatives of the various groups to discuss the proposed amendments.

“There is a general agreement on the need to retain the Act as an early prevention measure against acts of terror or other actions that can jeopardise national security,” he said.

He said the six meetings involved enforcement agencies, non-governmental organisations, academicians, law practitioners, politicians, members of Parliament, media practitioners and the general public.

(source: The Star)

The question is this: exactly which “various groups” was the minister referring to? Yes, Walski is a born skeptic, and being less than upfront about exactly whom Hisham met doesn’t sit well with his skepticism one tiny bit.
(a chance to give your two-bits worth, and more, in the full post)

Walski does admit that while he was a little unnerved by the Berita Harian headline, reading the English language version of the report did calm his nerves somewhat.

Let’s put it this way – does Walski think that it’s important to maintain national security? Hell, yeah. That’s a real no-brainer. But we live in a time when the public doesn’t buy any authority’s say-so merely on their say-so. If there’s evidence, formally charge them. It’s as simple as that.

Detention without trial is against the morality of just about any faith. Even against the morality of those without any specific faith, for that matter.

So you know where Walski stands on this issue.

But he still would like to know what all of you people think – and as far as the poll is concerned, he’s been fair.

There are 3 choices for you to pick from, based on what your opinion may be: abolish the ISA altogether, keep it, or keep it with the necessary amendments to prevent abuse of power.

As with earlier polls, if you have a Blogger-based blog, you can easily include it there by clicking the Add To Blogger button at the bottom of the poll. If you don’t have a Blogger-based blog, you can still add it by going to the Polldaddy poll page, and using the embed code provided.

Walski feels that this is a very important opinion poll, if there ever was one – what is the real feel of common everyday Malaysians. So spread the word, as far and wide as you can.

The poll will remain open until Midnight, December 31st, 2009. Walski’s counting on you…

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

Friday, December 25, 2009

Poll Position: A reality TV show called BTN

Technorati tags: , ,

It’s Christmas Day, and Walski’s got time on his hands – a bit more than he normally has. So, he thought that there’d be no better time than to go on an update-binge of myAsylum. To make up for lost time, and since he has time to kill.

Well, the BTN poll has concluded, and the results are in.

Results of the recent opinion poll, hostiing by Photobucket

It really looks like the pro-BTN & pro-BN/UMNO types didn’t bother to participate – just like many UMNO members aren’t even registered voters (tsk, tsk). Why? Because the fourth choice – “Let it be - it's doing the nation a great service” – was not even selected by a single person. Zero. Big fat nada. Zilch.

Either that, or it is true that NOBODY actually believes that the BTN – as is – is doing this country anything but disservice.
(result analysis, and more, in the full post)

The (simple) majority of 52% thought that the BTN should be shut down altogether. While the remainder 48% were split an equal 50/50 between a comprehensive revamp, and turning the damned thing into a reality TV show.

Walski has no clue whatsoever what a BTN reality show would resemble – maybe, based on some of the public sentiments about the department, a contest to see which BTN facilitator will emerge the Juara Rasis (Racist Champion)? A la American Idol, complete with viewer SMS voting, and with the participants themselves as judges. Not too shabby an idea, eh?

But kidding aside, Walski personally feels that the BTN – the National Civics Bureau – is still needed. Why? Simply because many Malaysian don’t have an ounce of civics consciousness in them whatsoever.

Special Handicap Reserve Parking Lots – who the fuck cares? Apart from Walski, not very many people. It’s more important that able-bodied Malaysians walk as little as possible, rather than even think of allowing those with physical disabilities to park. This totally screwed up personal priority system also accounts for double-parking, in many cases. It’s like Malaysians are totally allergic having to walk more than 10 steps… lazy fucks.

Holding the door for the person walking behind you? Naah – let the fucker fend for her/himself.

Saying “Thank You”, or wishing “Good Morning/Afternoon/Evening” to random strangers? Heck no – that’s reserved for foreigners, so that they can go home with the totally FALSE impression that Malaysians are courteous.

Traffic light junction? The main aim is to see how best one can cut the queue, and God forbid that one should have to line up like everyone else….

All of these are examples of why Walski thinks that the level of civic consciousness in Malaysia is decaying… so yeah, in that sense, the BTN is still needed. Not to develop a sense of blind allegiance to BN/UMNO or whomever the fuck the government of the day happens to be, but to teach Malaysians BASIC MANNERS.

But isn’t that the role of schools, you may ask? Once upon a time in Malaysia, yes, it used to be. Not anymore, though. Nope, these days it’s either Ugama or Moral Studies – and based on the general lack of civic consciousness Walski observes – neither of these cultivate good civics awareness.

Oh well… for the time being, though, the reality is that no one, save the PM, knows what will become of BTN. Many don’t see its relevance other than trying to brainwash young Malaysians. Others see it as a waste of time.

Walski thinks that it should be retained, but with its role totally overhauled, in addition to its curriculum. The question is, though, does ANYONE have the political balls to do anything with BTN?

Or, is it going to be another case of big hoo-haa sloganeering, and no action whatsoever?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

The "Bak" Stops Here

Technorati tags: , , , ,

Walski really wanted to say something about this yesterday, but because of the mad rush at work to get stuff done before the long-ish weekend, he didn’t get an opportunity to do so.

Once again, Malaysian Muslim “authorities” proudly display their SAPI-ness on their sleeves…

Screenshot from the article in The Star, hosting by Photobucket

Just in case you were wondering, SAPI is a Walski-created acronym, which stands for ‘Stupidly Arrogant & Prejudicially Ignorant’. Sapi is also happens to be a Malay language word (not very frequently used on the Peninsular) which means ‘cow’. And no, it’s no coincidence. And yes, it is meant to be insulting (assuming, of course, the insultees even have a clue what Walski’s on about).

But at myAsylum, there’s no insult without just cause, and the sheer stupidity and ignorance proudly displayed in this case, which in turn paints a picture of all Muslims being so feeble-minded, warrants insult. Because, quite frankly, they brought it upon themselves – reaping what they have so SAPI-ly sown.

And just to set the record straight, The Star did not mistranslate the original Bahasa Malaysia article, which you can read via this posting at The Malaysian Insider. The original article (published by Utusan – no SAPI surprises here) stated:

Penggunaan istilah bak kut teh halal boleh mengelirukan umat Islam di samping bertentangan hukum syarak kerana bercanggah dengan kaedah fiqah yang ditetapkan oleh Islam.

Ketua Penolong Pengarah Jabatan Kemajuan Agama Islam Malaysia (Jakim) Lokman Abdul Rahman berkata, bak kut teh tidak boleh dianggap halal kerana ia masih mengekalkan penggunaan nama yang haram mengikut hukum Islam.
(source: The Malaysian Insider)

Nevermind that JAKIM thinks all Malaysian Muslims are as stupid as they are, What really perplexes Walski is this: how the fuck can “bak kut teh” be an illegal name?
(proudly proclaiming ignorance, a Hokkien lesson, and more, in the full post)

Unless, of course, one is ignorant of what it actually means, and lets one’s prejudice take over. So, here’s a lesson in basic Hokkien:

bak means 'meat'. ANY meat.

kut means (literally) 'bone', and

teh means 'tea'

So what’s so bloody illegal about meat-bone-tea? Even if you took the phrase ‘bak kut’ in isolation – literally, “meat bone”, which is generally used to refer to spare ribs – there’s no direct reference to pork. And in case you didn’t know, cows and sheep/goats have spare ribs, too – basic biology, people.

As far as Walski knows, there's no prohibition on the consumption on meat in general stated in the Quran, except for the meat/flesh of swine/pigs. And you would definitely not be able to find the term bak kut teh anyplace in the holy book.

Part of the article also quotes the secretary-general of the Muslim Consumers Association of Malaysia – better know as PPIM – Datuk Dr. Maamor Osman.

Muslim Consumers Association of Malaysia secretary-general Datuk Dr Maamor Osman also disagreed with the introduction of bak kut teh halal.

“I am worried that misusing the term will slowly reduce the disinclination of Muslims towards pork. I hope Jakim can take strict measures to ensure that the food does not get halal certification,” he said.

(source: The Star)

To jolt your memory, PPIM are the same forsaken einsteins who took so much offence to cross-like patterns on biscuits.

You know, it's exactly this sort of authoritative dumbing-down stupidity that paints Muslims overall in a less than complementary light. So can you really blame the bad press that Muslims get the world over, when they themselves do and say the most ludicrous of things, and do it proudly, at that?

Walski's not entirely sure if PPIM had anything to do with the JAKIM statement, but it wouldn’t surprise him one bit if that were the case. Likely, what he thinks happened is that PPIM (dumbass ignoramuses that they are) made a complaint to JAKIM, who in turn didn’t think twice to support the consumer organization.

A clear-cut case of the blind leading the stupid…

Well, whatever these ignoramuslamists think they know, and proudly proclaim in all their ignorant glory, the bak definitely has to stop here.

Walski’s terminally made-up concatenative terminology attribution footnote: The term ignoramuslamist is another one of those words Walski made up. It consists of the the English word ignoramus, and muslamist, modified from the made-up word muslamism, penned by writer Ali Eteraz, from an article he wrote for Jewcy.

Just like Malaysian drivers and parking, when there doesn’t exist a word to adequately describe an idea, Walski simply makes one up.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......