Opinion Poll: Should MACC be held accountable?

Technorati tags: Opinion Poll, MACC, Teo Beng Hock

It’s probably obvious from the title what the latest opinion poll is all about. If it’s not, then read Walski’s post from yesterday.

Essentially, in the matter of Teo Beng Hock’s death, should the MACC (Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission) be held accountable?

(click on image for source)

It’s a simple poll with 3 simple multiple-choice answers – Yes, No or Don’t Know.

But at the same time, let’s make it clear what Walski means by being accountable. 
(it’s about accountability, and more, in the full post)

First of all, let Walski make it crystal clear that he’s not saying the MACC directly caused the death of Teo Beng Huat.

Rather, when deciding how to respond to the poll, take these facts into consideration:

• Teo was in MACC's custody the night before he died, being questioned.
• His body was found on the roof of a building adjacent to the tower where the Shah Alam MACC office is
• Teo was not a suspect, but a witness, according to MACC. It would be safe to assume that if that’s the case the MACC would at least be interested in Teo’s safety.

So, accountability here means that the MACC should bear some responsibility over events that led to Teo’ demise. After all, Teo was their “guest”, and he cooperated, from what MACC themselves are saying.

The poll will run for a week, beginning today, until midnight next Friday, July 24th 2009. If you operate a Blogger-based blog, you can easily put the poll up by clicking on the icon below the poll (located where it usually is, on the right sidebar).

Walski wants as wide a demographic spread to participate in this. He can guess (more or less) how the regular audience will respond. It’s the opinion of the rest that he’s also interested in.

Click here for the full post......

MACC Mystery Death

Technorati tags: MACC, Teo Beng Hock, Death In Custody, Scandal

Minister in the PM’s department, Nazri Abdul Aziz has said some pretty stupid things in the past. For those who don’t learn, history usually has a tendency to repeat itself.

Via Malaysiakini:

Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Mohd Nazri Abdul Aziz cautioned against pointing the finger at the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) for Teo Beng Hock's death.
(source: Malaysiakini, subscription required)

Okay, fair enough. But Teo was in the custody of MACC for questioning, so they do bear some responsibility. Especially since they only released him at the ungodly hour of 3:45 am. And then, Nazri gets insensitively stupid.

MACC's investigation division director Shukri Abdull had told reporters earlier that Teo was released at 3.45am but he continued to remain in the building.

Commenting on this, Nazri said: "I was informed by MACC earlier that he (Teo) was released yesterday (early this morning)."

"Then he should have gone home (instead)....and how would we know that he would jump out of the building?" the de facto law minister added.
(source: Malaysiakini, subscription required)

The question Walski has for this fucktard Nazri: how the fuck did HE know Teo jumped? 
(once defective, always defective, in the full post)

Yes, this mystery is still under investigation. Yes, we shouldn’t speculate. And neither should Nazri. Being the defective de facto Law Minister does not give him immunity to speculate either.

But here are the irrefutable facts:

• Teo was picked up by the MACC for questioning. This has been widely reported, and confirmed by the MACC themselves.
• The MACC took statements from Teo, as reported by Malaysiakini, from between 5pm on Wednesday, until around 3:45am early Thursday morning.
• Teo did not go home immediately and asked to be allowed to lie down until later in the morning (so close to his wedding? Strange, if you ask Walski).
• The last time MACC say they saw Teo alive was at around 6am Thursday morning.
• Teo’s body was found on the roof of an adjacent building at 1:30pm on Thursday.

Apart from that, we don't know anything else, other than the fact that Teo was supposed to have gotten married on Friday.

Now, again, Walski asks – more calmly this time – how the hell can Nazri say that Teo jumped? Does he know something we don’t?

Walski will not speculate any further, nor is he implying anything sinister on the part of the minister – apart from Nazri being an idiot for saying what he did. Not to mention being insensitive.

Now, Walski has to apologize for something that he is about to do. The following photograph, or others like it, has been published on several sites.

Walski knows that putting this up may be insensitive to the family of Teo Beng Hock. And for that he apologizes. However, he has edited the original photograph for reasons Walski hopes are obvious. He will be more than happy to take it off at a later time, if required. But for now, it is a photograph that everyone should remember.

This is the first death of someone while in MACC custody. Nevermind that Teo was only a witness. That’s irrelevant. And when an agency has somebody in their custody, the responsibility of that person’s safety lies with said agency.

That, and the veracity of MACC selectively investigating anything and anyone to do with Pakatan Rakyat is what a section of the public is pissed off about. It’s almost appearing like a witch hunt.

The Malaysian government will proudly advertise, on just about any public infrastructure project notice, that it is “another BN government project”. The MACC is a Malaysian government agency, directly under the purview of the Ministry of Home Affairs. Therefore, it is not an independent body, but a BN government agency. Let’s not forget that.

In the meantime, investigations into this very unfortunate incident is ongoing. Walski hopes that the investigation will be carried out without any stone unturned, no matter whom or what they may find underneath.

Walski would also like to extend his deepest condolences to the family and friends of the late Teo Beng Hock. Untimely deaths like this are tragic, especially when surrounded with many unknowns and political undertones. Without a doubt, this is a sad day for all concerned Malaysians. Apart from, it would seem, pro-BN bloggers who seem to be silent about this tragic incident.

With the number of deaths in police custody, and now the MACC, is there anybody that we can trust with our safety anymore?

Click here for the full post......

1Najib's Hundred

Technorati tags: Politics, Najib's First One Hundred Days, 1Malaysia, 1BlackMalaysia

Walski's post tardiness forenote: As has been the case lately, caused by Walski’s failure to synthesize more time in a day than the standard 24 hours, this post has been wallowing in draft for the past 5 days. He apologizes if some of the stuff here seems dated. In the bloggerhood, anything more than an hour old seems stale…

One hundred days – many consider this a landmark, of sorts. It’s a popular remembrance point for the deceased in many cultures and religions, for instance. In politics, it is also a benchmark to rate persons in office, particularly in the US. Barrack Obama’s first 100 days, for example, was reported on the world over, by all and sundry.

On a slightly smaller scale, and closer to home, Najib’s just had his first hundred yesterday, Saturday July 11th.

The reality of it is that Najib only officially started becoming PM in March this year. His tenure unofficially started a lot earlier, a view articulated by former Finance Minister Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah (via The Malaysian Insider), and one which Walski happens to agree with. This is because unlike his predecessors, Najib transitioned into his premiership without a general election. His is actually the mandate given to Abdullah Ahmad Badawi’s March 8, 2008 election bid.

In the big picture, furthermore, the first 100 days doesn’t really count for much, except for giving us an indication of how the rest of his tenure as Prime Minister may be. But since Malaysian politics can be very unpredictable, the first 100 days are rough indicators, at best. Very rough, in fact.

And since every other netizen seems to be wanting to comment, Walski, too will look at 1Najib’s first hundred.

In a nutshell, it’s been a hundred days of mixed signals, to put it mildly. 
(Walski’s selective ratings, and more, in the full post)

Walski’s assessment is in no way comprehensive. He’ll be the first to admit this. But it does cover areas that Walski feels are important, both to him, and to the nation at large. As with any hundred-day report card, we can classify Najib’s performance as either good, bad, or so-so, in the various categories Walski has chosen to look at.

Political Integrity
Now this is a kind of hot potato, from Walski's perspective, because it all depends on from which point you want to keep score from. The Perak Fiasco, for which Najib is clearly the mastermind, happened before our current PM’s inauguration.

Similarly with the current most talked about fiasco – the Port Klang Free Zone mismanagement. So to be fair, you can’t really blame the guy.

However, looking at his cabinet, and the statements and policy positions that have emanated, Walski is unimpressed, at best. Worst case, Walski is rather worried. But one thing clear is that very rarely does Najib butt in when his ministers make not-so-intelligent remarks (and there have been quite a few).

But it does seem like Najib’s making some headway in the political acceptance department, evidenced by the jump in his approval rating, from 45% to 65%, according to the Merdeka Center’s latest survey (via The Malaysian Insider), and by the Manik Urai by-election last Tuesday, where PAS managed to retain the seat, but by a measly 65 votes, which some are calling a moral victory for UMNO.

Walski thinks that the victory, in a big way, has to do with the so-called Unity Talks that UMNO (especially their grassroots) is still aggressively pushing for, and factions within PAS taking the bait. Believe you Walski, the Unity Talks will benefit one, and only one, party – UMNO. PAS will end up looking like another UMNO, except in silly, out-of-season desert garb. And because there is a good part of PAS that can see this, it may very well end up splitting the party in the process.

Or maybe Walski is being over-analytical, and BN’s promise of a new bridge had something to do with PAS’ sliver slim victory margin. Which, if so, does constitute an election “bribe” in some people’s books. So much for political integrity…

In a nutshell, the best Walski can rate Najib in this department is a resounding so-so. Or 50-50, if you’re more numerically inclined.

Civil Liberties 
This is one area Walski can safely say has suffered tremendously since Najib’s come into office. And by civil liberties, Walski includes freedom of assembly (from teargas and water cannons), freedom to wear black, freedom to deliver butter cakes, freedom to light candles, and freedom to use certain words like apartheid (via The Malaysian Insider).

Instead, what we’re seeing is arrests for no other apparent reason than because the police feel like it. And then, deny the detainees legal representation.

The most recent seemingly arbitrary arrest of two non-Malay USM students over the weekend for alleged “criminal trespass” onto a “Malay-only area” in UM (via Jelas.info) is not only shocking, it’s disgusting. And yet, Hishamuddin balks when the word apartheid is used?

And Malaysians are still asking the question: why the fuck wasn’t the IPCMC instituted, according to the Royal Commission on Police Misconduct? Instead, a much watered-down Enforcement Agencies Integrity Commission (EAIC) was put into place. Read this post (via Loyar Burok) why the EAIC may actually not be constitutional, while the IPCMC is.

The media, too, is slowly but surely being more muzzled than it has in recent years. One case in point: Florence Looi (of NTV7) being issued a warning letter and an immediate transfer to the station’s news desk (via the Bahasa Malaysia version of Merdeka Reivew). Her crime? For allowing a guest on her Point of View program, The Malaysian Insider’s Leslie Lau, to rate Najib’s first 100 days. It’s no secret that NTV7 is owned by Media Prima (who own ALL the free-to-air stations), and also no big secret that Media Prima is closely linked to UMNO.

Similarly, Media Prima earlier this year (according to Malaysiakini) issued a directive to all 4 of its TV stations to not mention the name Razak Baginda when reporting the Altantuya murder case. Mahathir era self-censorship?

Of course, there are a lot of other examples that Walski has not mentioned. But to put it simply, as far as civil liberties are concerned: FAIL.

Economic Liberalization 
If there is one area that Najib has actually been bold enough to reform, it is in the area of the economy, where certain Bumi equity requirements are being eased. Needless to say, this has not been received well by many within his own party, particularly those NEP-is-our-birthright types.

Blogger Sakmongkol AK47 (who happens to be an UMNO member) provides some interesting insights pertaining to the removal of the 30% equity requirement. In essence, he thinks it’s a good thing. Read what he has to say here.

Here’s the thing – the NEP was formulated in a different era, when the socio-economic strata was very different from what it is today. While the 30% Bumiputra equity ownership requirement was aimed at engineered equitable wealth distribution, it has been abused over the years. Sakmongkol AK47 explains it quite well in his posting, so Walski will not reinvent the wheel.

But Walski’s take on the NEP is this: if it is true that the Malay population are economically the worst off in this country (as claimed by the NEP-is-our-birthright folks), then wouldn’t opening up the NEP to help ALL Malaysians in need cater for the lower economic tier Malays by default? Poverty effects Malaysians of all flavors and colors.

Similarly, if meritocracy is seriously one aspect of 1Malaysia, then let’s make sure it’s emphasized, per the proper definition of the word.

This is one area that Walski gives Najib the thumbs up.

Social Liberalization 
In contrast, social liberalization still has a very long way to go. Granted, Najib’s cabinet has tried, somewhat – for instance, in the issue of forced conversion of minors. But then reality sets in.

And the reality is that religious conservatism is alive and well in this country. This is one of those other hot potato areas that Walski thinks Najib can do jack about. Conservatism is too well entrenched, no thanks, in part, to the abdication of certain civil rights to the religious conservatives on all sides of the political divide.

It is also no thanks, in part, to the fact that Islam has been politicized. In the war for the Malay Malaysian mindshare, the political “war” between UMNO and PAS has not been without casualty. And that casualty, unfortunately, is some of our fundamental rights.

The key problem is the erosion of mutual respect, cultivated by a very one-sided atmosphere when it comes to religion in Malaysia. By law, other religions are prohibited from proselytizing to Muslims. On the other hand Muslims are allowed (even encouraged) to proselytize to whomever, whenever and wherever they want. It’s not fair, but that’s the law per our Federal Constitution.

Some Muslims, however, translate this to “don’t even fucking let me see a pamphlet of your other religion”. But Muslims can do pretty much whatever they want in the name of spreading or protecting their religion. To the mainstream Muslims in this country, that is fair. Which is probably why white/yellow becomes black, and pedestrian crossings don’t mean a fucking thing in Malaysia. But that’s an entirely other rant that Walski won’t get into.

Suffice it to say, this sense of “fairness” is what’s led to the Al-Islam “investigative journalism” faux pas, which many Muslims (this one, in particular) think is no big deal, but at the same time balk (this one again, in particular) when Christian missionary folks set foot on campuses, even when their purpose there was only to conduct a survey – and end up being detained by campus security.

Walski predicts that any attempt to liberalize society will be met with strong, perhaps even violent, opposition. This is one area that Walski thinks Najib has not succeeded in his first 100 (official) days, nor will he make much headway anytime soon.

Not really Najib’s fault at all, but a thumbs down in this area, since there is not one iota of improvement.

Education 
Our education system is another mess that Najib inherits from his predecessors. And the recent decision on the abolishment of PPSMI (Teaching of Maths & Science in English) by 2012 only goes to show that Najib’s administration is only going to make it worse.

The abolishment obviously was done for reasons of political appeasement, primarily on the part of the linguistic nationalists. Granted that the program was implemented in a very haphazard and rushed manner – then again, being that Ministry of Education has been a political stepping stone ministry, populist policies (or reversal of policies) are only to be expected. To the detriment of the education system.

One question that’s been raised is this: why is it that the entire damned system has to cater for the weakest students, and not aimed instead at excellence?

National Security 
These days, a lot of things are seen to be undermining national security – candlelight vigils, organized kopi-o drink-ins, t-shirts, peaceful protests (by anyone other than those blessed by BN), etc. – a lot of things, other than the feeling of actually being safe.

Crimes are on the rise, particularly violent ones. And Walski’s not talking about peaceful civil actions that are labeled ‘criminal’ – he’s talking about real crimes, like robbery, murder

~ ~ ~o O o~ ~ ~

There are a lot of other areas that Walski has not covered – he’s decided that if this post were to ever get out, he would have to cut it short. For a more comprehensive look at what some other people are saying about Najib’s first 100 days, here are some resources for you to peruse (which in all likelihood you may already have read):

• Oon Yeoh's in-depth analysis in The Edge (in 8 parts – Part 5 is the latest to be published. Free registration required to access articles at The Edge)
• Rocky Bru’s take on Najib’s 100 Days
• Sakmongkol AK47’s view: The 100 Days Myth
• Aisehman’s KRA-zified analysis
• The mainstream media’s views: Bernama, NST, The Malaysian Mirror, and The Star, among others.

As Prime Minister, Walski thinks that Najib shows promise. Which he’s offered a lot of for a better Malaysia, and it’s left to be seen whether these promises will be delivered as advertised.

And that, folks, is what Walski will be looking out for the next hundred days or so…

Click here for the full post......

Millennium

Technorati tags: Humor, Blogging, Millennium, Blog Art

This was bound to happen at some point. It’s just that Walski didn’t realize it “some point” would happen so soon.

Yes, this is myAsylum’s 1,000th post – a millennium of eclectic rambling thoughts. Time does fly (except in Kerteh)… what started as an avenue for Walski to vent, back in January 21, 2006, has evolved into… well, an avenue for Walski to vent. That much, fortunately, hasn’t changed.

Walski therefore declares today, July 10, 2009, myAsylum Millenium Day. If you take the day off, though, you do so at your own peril.

And so to commemorate this uneventful milestone, he decided to change the header. Think of it as a snapshot of what’s currently happening in Malaysia… 
(header inspiration, and more, in the full post)

Except maybe for The Beatles bit... but Walski reckoned he should include the Fab Four because the inspiration for the header design did come from the iconic Sgt Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band album cover. Together, of course, with some other characters that have at some point appeared on this blog, either as an image, or mentioned in print.

The thing about the myAsylum header is that it changes periodically – sometimes commemorating a special occasion, sometimes to reflect certain events of note. And sometimes for no other reason but simply Walski felt like it. But evolve it has, over the last 3 years plus.

And what better post to walk down memory lane a bit, and re-post some of the banners that have adorned this blog in the past, starting with the original, then chronologically as the years progressed.

The above is the earliest banner image on record, which was used when this blog was still using the basic Minima Black standard 2-column template. That was later replaced by the Version 2 banner, which appeared (if Walski remembers correctly) sometime in 2007.

It was at this point that Walski decided to add variants to the base banner, and so there were event-related variants like the 2007 World AIDS Day special, etc.

When Walski decided to give the blog a totally new look, and template, the Version 3 banner was released, on April 2, 2008 – one day after the April Fool’s Day Hello Kitty template temporarily adorned this blog for a day.

And the Version 3 remains as the base image, on which, of course, variants have been introduced – like this year’s April Fool’s blog invasion banner. The original concept had the 4 members of the myAsylum marketing supreme council to be blindfolded, but Walski was kind of pressed for time.

So, what now adorns the top of this blog is Version 3 Rev 6, the Millennium Edition. This banner, is a big departure from the earlier ones, because for the first time, the blog title does not appear symmetrical. In fact, the lopsided, almost unbalanced feel is intentional, reflecting what’s currently going on. Hopefully, over time, that, too will change.

And that’s the one  constant about myAsylum – change. That, and you never know what to expect. Kind of oxymoronic, if you think about it, but that’s Walski for ya. You gotta roll with the punches.

When life gives you lemons, you make lemon meringue pie (lemonade is so last century).

One thousand posts, Walski reckons, is a landmark of sorts. It would have been nice if myAsylum were part of the millionaire blog club – a million hits or more – but one maxim he’s believed in is quality over sheer quantity. Over the years, this blog has managed to keep a handful of readers who return regularly.

On behalf of the marketing supreme council, Walski thanks you. And he hopes you folks will stick around until the next millennium, at least.

God, and these days Rais Yatim, willing…

Click here for the full post......

Walski's brain went on holiday...

Technorati tags: Humor, Holiday, Blog Holiday, Brain On Holiday, Wolverine, Iran, Mohan Singh

It appears that some of you were wondering where Walski went. Or at least regular reader Pah Nur did.

Strange as it may sound, Walski’s brain decided to go on holiday for a bit.

Without bothering to tell Walski first, or even seek his prior approval. Which did cause a bit of a problem in the creativity department. Stranger still, the motor function department seemed to not notice.

The good news is, however, that myAsylum’s intrepid Cybernetic Remote Autonomous Para-roaches (CRAP) managed to track down Walski’s brain, and said brain has been repatriated.

Oh well, whatever… but time did fly on this unannounced blog holiday, and before Walski realized it (absent brain notwithstanding), it’s been over a week since the last entry. Yes, it’s true… time flies.

Except when Walski went to Kerteh last week. Boy… talk about a boring town. And being that Kerteh is in Terengganu, just so you know, Walski did not see any flying prayer mats. In fact, Kerteh is so boring, even time doesn’t freakin’ fly. There’s a reason why Kerteh, despite being Peninsular Malaysia’s oil & gas and petrochemical capital, has not flourished more than it has. But Walski will cover that at some point later in another post.

Despite his brain being on holiday, Walski’s been thinking about a number of things. Much has happened, both in Walski’s personal world as well as the world around him. Good things, strange things…

But one thing Walski has managed to catch up with is films – watching some of those flicks he’d wanted to but couldn’t find the time to watch.

And one of those films is Wolverine, the first X-Men Origins films to hit the big screen (yes, there are more to come). Or, in Walski’s case the small screen of his living room. Not a bad flick, although he must say that it wasn’t extraordinary in any way – CGI notwithstanding.

But it did raise some interesting questions in Walski’s vacuous mind… 
(when the brain’s away, the mind will play, in the full post)

Like the brothers Logan & Victor Creed – a.k.a. Wolverine and Sabretooth. If they can’t age, how could they have grown up from being kids at the start of the film? Or if they’d have to redo the first X-Men film so that Sabretooth will look consistent.

And what which of Wolverine’s parents had superpowers? Or is Walski getting X-men confused with Heroes?

The mystery continues… probably the brain going on holiday was a contributing X-factor.

Some of you might also have thought that Walski was in mourning over the passing of Micheal Jackson. Answer: No. But, MJ was on Walski’s mind, sort of. For other reasons.

The thoughts were revolving around this: being that MJ supposedly converted to Islam sometime before his death, and IF the guy were Malaysian, would the authorities be fighting the family over his body around about now? The news about Mohan Singh’s conversion to Islam being ruled to have happened, and the civil court washing its hands (not for the first time), kind of brought those thoughts to the fore yesterday.

Isn’t it more important how the guy lived (not that MAIS – Selangor’s religious department – cared, it seems), rather than the obsession of the religious authorities over his dead body? Then again, this is Malaysia – where how you’re buried seems more important.

And then, of course, the ongoing protests in Iran – Walski thought some about that too. But he’ll cover that in a separate post, sometime in the near future. All he will say now is that in a theocratic state such as Iran, those going against the status quo can be accused of going against God (via Arab Times Online). In that respect, Walski reckons that Malaysia is lucky. For now.

But even as Iranians continue to protest against an election they felt was stolen from them, new unrest has been reported in China. This time it’s clashes between the Muslim Uighurs and the Hans, happening in Urumqi, Western China. And just as Iran tries to suppress information from being disseminated, so is China (via The New York Times).

On a more personal front, Walski is no longer in limbo – you know, being that his brain came back and all. Which is a nice feeling. Suspended animation is okay for the first few days, but after that it really starts to get old. Not to mention boring.

There are a few other thoughts that did cross his mind, but those aren’t as important. Besides, they’re not exactly newsworthy anymore.

It may be a few more days (but hopefully less) until Walski gets back into the full swing of things blog-wise – the brain needs to accustom itself to it’s cage again – but when Walski does, you might find things here a tad bit different.

And that’s because the next post will be a landmark one, of sorts. That’s all the details you are gonna get for now.

 

Click here for the full post......

In Memoriam: Michael Joseph Jackson (1958 - 2009)

Technorati tags: In Memoriam, Michael Jackson, King Of Pop, Black Or White, Black And White

Walski won’t lie to you – he’s never been a big fan of Michael Jackson. Or much of any size fan. Or, a fan of most pop, for that matter. Not in Walski’s adult life, at least – his cuppa tea’s always been music with more edge.

Some people prefer stuff that’s “popular”, since everybody else likes it. Easier to fit in, he reckons, when you roam in bigger numbers – but Walski’s always preferred to rock to the beat of a different drum machine. That’s just the way he rolls…

That said, Walski will admit this: the world of pop culture lost a major icon today. And rightfully, the entire world today mourns Michael Jackson’s passing. He died early today, succumbing to a cardiac arrest. He was 50 (just a couple of months short of turning 51).

The boy had talent, and he certainly could dance – like no other person had danced before, or likely would again.

As an artist, Michael Jackson went through various stages of metamorphosis – from the young but talented baby brother in the Jackson 5, to the enigmatically bizarre pop icon. But in between, thru the many stages of change, he gave to the world what he will be best remembered for – hit and hip pop tunes and superhuman dance moves. In spades.

The King of Pop may be dead, but his legacy will live on for generations to come. 
(a Black and White tribute, and more, in the full post)

He has contributed much to the world of popular music and popular culture during his lifetime. About that, there is no doubt.

Walski could probably write a lot about Michael Jackson – the good, the bad, and the outrageously bizarre – despite not being a fan. But that would probably be a rehash of the millions of tribute pieces that would have been written by now.

Instead, Walski would like to highlight a side of Michael Jackson that many didn’t pay much attention to – his philanthropy. In year 2000, the Guinness Book of Records listed him as supporting 39 different charities. He also founded the Heal The World Foundation in 1992, aimed at providing assistance to the underprivileged. Jackson also spoke up for HIV/AIDS in the early 90’s, at a time when such action was still considered controversial.

Finally, Michael Jackson did leave one legacy behind that is entirely Malaysian. It’s probably something even the late King of Pop didn’t know about.

It’s called the Black & White – a mixture of soy bean milk and grass jelly. Generally known as Soya Cincau locally in Malaysia, it earned the nickname Black & White partly in honor of the King of Pop. Another nickname for this drink is, in fact, Michael Jackson – supposedly given by some coffee shop owner somewhere. A tongue in cheek tribute, but a tribute nonetheless.

In any case, Walski had this at lunch, while offering a silent toast to the departed pop icon… for all that Michael Jackson had given to the world of popular culture.

Here’s to you, Michael… thank you, on behalf of your many fans. May you finally find your eternal Neverland, and may your soul rest in peace. Until, of course, it’s time to put those dancing shoes on again, for that great gig in the sky…

Black Or White also happens to be one Michael Jackson song Walski actually kind of likes. For a couple of reasons – like the fact it came with an absolutely fantasticool video, particularly the morphing bits towards the end. But more importantly, because the song is about breaking down barriers of race and color – something that a color-blind person like Walski strongly believes in, too.

And it’s something that Walski thought most appropriate to close this post with.

The King is Dead… Long Live The King… forever in our memories.

Click here for the full post......

In Memoriam: Farrah Fawcett (1947 - 2009)

Technorati tags: In Memoriam, Farrah Fawcett, Charlie's Angels, Jill Munroe

If you’re around and about Walski’s age group, you will probably remember this iconic image of Farrah Fawcett, then known as Farrah Fawcett-Majors.

While her most memorable, and immediately recognizable, role was as Jill Munroe on the popular TV series Charlie’s Angels (between 1976 and 1980), Fawcett’s career actually began much earlier. She had started her career in the late 60’s, appearing in several commercials, and playing minor roles on a few TV series.

She had also appeared in The Six Million Dollar Man, along side then husband Lee Majors, as Major Kelly Wood, America’s first female astronaut.

She will, however, be best remembered for her role in Charlie’s Angels, as Jill Munroe, along side actresses Kate Jackson and Jaclyn Smith. Even though she was only on full time for one season (her spot replaced by Cheryl Ladd, playing Jill’s younger sister Kris Munroe), with cameo appearances in later seasons.

Although she remained active in film and TV, it is her role in Charlie’s Angels that will always be the immediate memory whenever her name is mentioned.  
(why this obit and not the other, and more, in the full post)

Walski recalls that just about every guy in his school class had a crush on Farrah Fawcett. She was a sex symbol, no doubt.

After her separation from Lee Majors, she had been romantically linked to actor Ryan O’Neil, with whom she had a son.

Walski chose to put up an obit on her first, instead of the other major passing of the day, primarily because Walski knew that her death would be immediately overlooked by many. And because Charlie’s Angels was actually one of his favorite TV programs when he was a kid, he figured that it’s important that she not get too terribly overshadowed.

Farrah Fawcett had been battling cancer ever since she had been diagnosed with anal cancer three years ago. At one point she was declared cancer free, as reported back in 2006 after treatment and surgery (via USA Today). But not long after, it returned.

She passed away on the morning of June 25th, 2009 (Los Angeles time – approximately 1:30am this morning Malaysian time).

May her soul rest in peace. The world's favorite angel finally gets her wings for real…

Click here for the full post......

A foot

Technorati tags: Humor, Crypticism, Politics, A Foot, 1Tangent

In all likelihood, no matter how shoddy an English language education you got in school, you probably would have heard that clichéd saying.

And yes, it is originally that foot...

If you actually haven’t, then the teaching of English is in even worse shape than Walski originally thought.

On top of that, there’s another saying: something is a foot. And since something can literally be anything, it means that our entire existence boils down to 12 inches. 
(12 inches of separation to rule the world, and more, in the full post)

Why? Simply because, 12 inches is a foot. And since anything in infinitely large numbers is everything. Our entire friggin’ universe – 12 inches.

If you’re trying to make sense out of all this, Walski’s advice is DON’T. Because it’ll never add up to what you hope it adds up to. It’ll just add up to 12 inches.

Because something is a foot. Something, like a standard ruler – 12 inches. Even those idiotic rulers with only metric scales on them. Centimeters on one edge, and millimeters on the other. Even if the ruler is physically a foot long. 12 inches, in other words. And what sense does a 12-inch long metric ruler make? Go figure…

Like, have you ever wondered if those foot-long hot dogs actually measure 12 inches? Or do you just take it for granted that they are, because measuring them would be too much trouble. But then, by default, if it were too much trouble, and since trouble is a foot… Yup – 12 inches, buddy boy. Case closed… and Walski would like fries with that, please.

Think of this post as one big tangent. But tangents, no matter how big, will always be 12 inches. If you’ve read enough posts on this blog, you’ll know that Walski is prone to go on tangents sometimes. And tangents can be a problem because it takes your mind away from the main point, discussion, or argument. Therefore, tangents to an argument can be trouble. Uh-oh… you got it… 12 inches. And it follows from there that tangents are a foot.

Exactly like that “unity talks is an Islamic duty" statement by Najib, which some say is contradictory to, and becomes a tangent from, the concept of 1Malaysia. And since tangents are always 12 inches, they are trouble.

Because trouble is a foot. Especially the kind that ends up in people’s mouths. Those are really trouble.

Walski hopes all this makes sense to you, because he sure as hell hasn’t a clue what the heck is going on anymore.

Trouble. Is a foot. Just like Something. Each.

And if you ain’t packing at least a full 12 inches, the best advice Walski can give you is to shut the hell up.

Click here for the full post......

Political Marriage: The Musical

Technorati tags: Humor, Politics, PAS, UMNO, Unity Government, Hegemony

A lot has been said of late about the now aborted unity government talks between PAS and UMNO. Some have even likened it to a marriage.

There’s probably some truth to that idea, Walski thinks. Had it gone ahead, it would have been a marriage based on love. But not any ‘ol kind of love.

Walski wonders if he’s the only one that sees it this way. 
(more hypothetical thoughts and musical “what ifs”, in the full post)

On a lighter note, Prime Minister and UMNO President likened exploring the possibilities of a unity government to a marriage proposal. The thought that crossed Walski’s mind when he heard this was “Hmmm… isn’t that like coveting another man’s wife?”

Oh, wait – Najib’s been down that road before, too.

But, kidding aside, Walski reckons that such a marriage would have been worrisome for many. Himself included.

For one thing, both bride and groom have multiple personalities that make up each whole entity. Each side, for example, have their fair share of conservatives, when combined into a unity government, could mean that any comment or criticism of policies would be tantamount to attacking Islam. Shannon Shah, through his article in The Nut Graph, seemed to think along the same lines.

Sure, both UMNO and PAS came from the same body politic, but that was in a time long, long ago, in a galaxy far, far away.

And what both parties have evolved into belie their more liberal beginnings.

The fear is that had the marriage gone ahead, the conservative elements on both sides would rise to the fore, and it would have been their way, or the highway. Or, that their way would be a highway in itself – one much worse than the other highway.

Hand basket sales would have never been brisker.

The other side of the coin is that mooting such unity talks were strategically designed to cause disarray in the Pakatan Rakyat coalition, and less to do with Malay and/or Islamic “unity”.

Which always begs the question – unity against what? Or whom?

Blogger Dr. M. Bakri Musa, in the opening of his piece, The Poison of “Unity” Government, pretty much asks the same question.

The two Malay political parties – UMNO and PAS – are battling each other to convince us that each is better than the other in advancing the “Malay agenda.” The two are like ageing fighters stuck with their same old tired moves. They are oblivious of the fact that we are fed up with their act; their lack of vigor and imaginative new strategies.

In a clumsy if not desperate attempt for new moves they concocted a ‘vision’ for a ‘unity’ government based on the two parties! Left unstated is the question: Unity for what and against whom?
(source: M. Bakri Musa)

And that’s where part of the fear was, too – that the “real” enemy for this intended marriage may just have been anything, or anyone, against what the proposed New Malaysian Order stood for.

Whatever the heck that would’ve evolved to become…

Politics, apart from having strange bedfellows, can be perplexing sometimes. But the aim of Malaysian politics, it seems, is the pursuit of power. Power and all the trappings that come with it, to Walski, is the real root of all evil. And when power is the real motivation, those in pursuit of it will stop at nothing. You know the saying about the corruptibility of absolute power, right? Well, the pursuit of it gets pretty ugly as well.

In any case, this talk of marriage between PAS and UMNO is now moot. For now, at least. It’s not the first time such “marriage proposals” have been talked about, nor will it likely be the last.

For the time being, we can go back to feeling how we did before all this “unity” talks emerged…

Click here for the full post......

Swinging from Poll 2 Poll

Technorati tags: Opinion Poll, Poll Position, Malaysia, 1Malaysia, Ideal Malaysia

Recently, Walski put up a poll asking if you peeps understood what the 1Malaysia concept is all about, or not. And the results weren’t all that surprising – although Walski was a little disappointed with the underwhelming response. But nevermind.

In any case, 75% of you didn’t have a clue. And quite frankly, Walski’s not entirely sure either – as did 17% of the poll respondents. And only 8% understand what it’s all about.

Okay, yes, Walski knows about the 8 thrusts and all that, but with the political appeasement caveats introduced, doesn’t it sound like status quo restated? At best, aren’t these 8 thrusts pretty much leading to the same damned thing that Vision 2020 wants to achieve? And by when?

More importantly, however, for Walski is this question – what kind of Malaysia would you like to see in the future, as a result, or despite of, 1Malaysia? 

Which, by some strange cosmic coincidence is exactly the question that the new poll asks (see sidebar).
(rules of poll response, and more, in the full post)

The poll will run for about 8 days or so, until the end of June. And as usual, if you have a blog on the Blogger platform, you can easily incorporate the poll by clicking the button below it.

Yes, the choices may seem limited, but then again, these are the possibilities Walski sees, based on the current situation. You can, by the way, add a response of your own, if you wish.

Personally, Walski would like to see a more democratic and a more liberal Malaysia. No one has the right to claim a permanent lease on leadership, nor does any individual have the right to impose their own morality onto another.

Then again, that’s just Walski.

Which is exactly why he put the poll up. What do YOU want as an ideal Malaysia down the road?

 

Click here for the full post......

Book Launch: "Things In Common"

Technorati tags: Books, Book Launch, Things In Common, Syed Akbar Ali

Friday, June 19th, 2009, saw the official launch of a book called “Things In Common”, written by Syed Akbar Ali. The book, for the most part, explores further a theme introduced in his second book, “Malaysia and The Club of Doom”, which Walski had reviewed back in 2006.

The book was launched at Kelantan Delights Restaurant, now located at Sooka Sentral, the food and entertainment complex just across from KL Sentral Station, by none other than Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, former Prime Minister of Malaysia, who also is an active blogger these days.

Tun Dr. M, who was accompanied by his wife Tun Dr. Siti Hasmah, had also launched Syed Akbar Ali’s second book, some two years ago.

Also in attendance were luminaries from the Malaysian bloggerhood and world of journalism, such as Ahirudin “Rocky” Attan (pictured on the right), Big Dog, Nuraina Samad, Amir Muhammad, A. Kadir Jasin, just to name a few. All in all, according to the book author’s blog, about 120 people or so, including many of his friends and family.

More pictures from the launch can be viewed at the Minaq Jinggo Photopages. What Walski

Walski shared a table with Rocky, Nuraina, and blogger Alliedmartster, located somewhere towards the back, from where the rostrum and main table were. Rocky, of course, was recently appointed CEO of the Malay Mail, his second tour of duty, having served on the paper earlier.

The launch was not very different from other book launches that Walski had attended in the past – speeches by the author and guest of honor, signing of the book plaque by the guest of honor.

What was a little different about this launch was the short press conference afterwards – journos probing the thoughts of Dr. M on political happenings of the day. 
(more on the launch, with lots more pictures, in the full post)

In any case, the first to speak was Syed Akbar Ali, who started off by briefly explaining the motivation behind his third book. As mentioned earlier, “Things In Common” is an expansion of a theme introduced in his second book, that many things considered to be part of Islam today are not found in the Quran, but can be found in the scriptures of the other two Abrahamic religions, Judaism and Christianity.

This idea was first introduced in chapter 11 of his second book, “Malaysia and The Club of Doom”. 

Syed Akbar mentioned of a less than amicable relationship between the Islamic world and the West, and that many of the practices generally associated with Islam – such as cruel punishment of stoning of adulterers, temporal punishment for apostasy, and destruction of other faiths’ temples and icons – were blamed on the Quran. After all, the Quran is the primary source of Islamic guidance.

He states that this blame is off the mark, because many, if not all, of these Islam-associated practices are not even mentioned in the Quran. Many of these, however, can instead be found in the Bible, in particular the Old Testament. But this misunderstanding is not surprising – even Muslims, too, don’t know well enough what’s in the Quran. And more importantly, what’s not.

And so, Syed Akbar’s aim with this book – to bridge the gap of understanding. Not just of those in the so-called West, but within the Muslim community as well. But to understand the Quran, one must be able to read it in a language that one is comfortable with. This idea, too, is touched upon by Tun Dr. Mahathir later on during his 20-some minute speech.

“Things In Common“ is divided into four parts, with the first 3 parts examining in detail the practices generally accepted as “Islamic”, but whose basis cannot be found anywhere in the Quran. Part 4 focuses on Malaysia, primarily, and again ties in with his previous book, asking an implicit, but important question – where we are headed as a nation.

One thing Walski intends to do, but has not yet been able to, is to write a review of the book. Perhaps covering the launch has now provided an impetus.

Next up on the podium was Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, with his keynote address. Tun is still sharp for his age, and his speech, peppered with his usual biting wit, is testament to that.

Tun began by quipping that he had felt apprehensive at first about accepting the invitation to launch the book, stating the current climate vis-à-vis Islam. He then made an observation that Muslims, particularly Malay/Muslims in Malaysia, were increasingly seeking exclusivity when it comes to their faith. That it is their faith, and their faith alone, that is the correct one, to the extent of ignoring and even rejecting any notion that there are similarities with other religions. In fact, many similarities existed between Islam and other religions.

And perhaps the evolution of this outlook has to do with the method of how we were learned about Islam. Tun recalled that when he was young, religion was taught on the basis that whatever was learned had to be accepted without question. The Quran was taught to be recited, but the emphasis was never on what information the book conveyed. Walski can attest to this fact – that we were expected to accept whatever we were taught without question.

Today, there are many interpretations of, and what constitutes, “Islam”. Or, as Tun put it, “many religions of Islam”. While this in itself is natural, the problem comes in when each school of thought regards their interpretation as the one and only valid one, and start regarding others as deviant. Loyalty is to their own ulama (learned person) and to the interpretation that their ulama has. The many “religions of Islam” today are literally at loggerheads with each other. The most well-known and obvious one today being the schism between Sunni and Shiah Islam.

But more than just divided, Muslims today are a confused lot, and are not able to derive guidance from the Quran. One reason for this is that by and large, the “study” of the Quran is limited to being able to recite the book in perfect pronunciation. Tun said that it is important to be able to read the Quran in a language that one is comfortable with, in order that the wisdom contained in the book can be derived. Only then can understanding be derived from the Holy Book.

Instead, the general expectation is that one can only learn the Quran from a teacher, and not on our own. The question then arises: doesn’t that teacher, too, use his/her own interpretation? So, certain interpretations (which may or may not be right to begin with) get passed down from one generation to the next, without the benefit of referring to the original Quranic text.

When it comes to Syariah laws, to Tun, the underlying principle should be justice, for which, through his own study, there are 42 references in the Quran. Justice is an important theme in the book, and using a few examples, concluded that whatever laws are unjust cannot be from the Quran.

One example that Tun Dr. Mahathir quoted was when it came to rape. The generally accepted precept that 4 male witnesses are needed to “prove” that the rape occurred is unjust. And as it has happened (elsewhere in the “Islamic” world), if rape cannot be proven, the victim is liable to be prosecuted instead. That is certainly not justice.

And when it comes to punishments, many that are generally accepted to be “Islamic” are actually do not originate from the Quran – stoning being one of them, which has been borrowed/adopted from the scriptures of other religions.

Being able to study the Quran in one’s own language, therefore, is important so that an individual is able to discern what is and is not from the Quran, and not have to rely on anecdotal information alone.

No book launch is complete without the guest of honor signing the plaque, and this occurred not long after Tun Dr. Mahathir concluded his keynote address.

And then, it was time for the press to have their time with both Tun and Syed Akbar Ali, which lasted for about 20 minutes or so.

Walski will attempt to do a review of the book in the not too distant future (hopefully later this coming week). He thanks Syed Akbar Ali for the invitation, and wishes him all the best for his upcoming book.

Yes, folks, you heard it – expect another book to come your way very soon. Walski’s not sure when, exactly, nor what the book will be about. Rest assured, however, that as soon as he knows, and gets clearance to announce something, you’ll be one of the first to know.

The following are more pictures from the event. If you get a chance, pick up a copy of Things In Common, available in major bookstores nationwide. Walski guarantees you an interesting read.

Read Syed Akbar Ali's own report of the book launch here. Blogger Big Dog, who was there, has his report on the book launch.

“Things In Common” has been reviewed by the following blogs (Long ago! Walski’s just late in doing this):
► Writing by Amir: In God we trust
► Rapera: BookIntro7: THINGS IN COMMON - SYED AKBAR ALI

Click here for the full post......

Top 10: Rocking the Iranian Revolution

Technorati tags: Humor, Top Ten, Iran, Green Revolution

Walski doesn’t know offhand if Mahmoud Ahmadinejad likes rock. In all likelihood, Ali Khamenei, Iran’s Supreme Leader (and not Diana Ross, as some people might think), detests such decadent music. Actually, Walski is almost certain that this is the case.

But the situation in Iran is interesting – it could very well develop into the country’s third revolution.

And if such a thing were to come to pass, what better way to commemorate the event, than with a rock-ish compilation?

Presenting Walski’s Top Ten Hits to Rock the new Iranian Revolution
(the Top 10 list, and more, in the full post)

10. Transmission (Joy Division)
If it transmits, very likely it's been blocked, or monitored/censored. There have been numerous reports, via Twitter and the blogs, about SMS network shutdowns, and about certain web sites and online services blocked. Not just after the election results were announced, but apparently even prior to the polling. Infidel airwaves, Walski supposes…

9. Enjoy The Silence (Depeche Mode)
One interesting and unique characteristic of the protests have been the lack of sound from the protesters. To underline the peaceful nature of these protests, that is. Some even taped their mouth shuts, signifying the suppression of their voices.

8. You Really Got Me (The Kinks)
In what's called a "guided" democracy, such as Iran, potential candidates for both the presidential and legislative polls are vetted by the Council of Guardians, a 12-jurist body appointed (6 directly and 6 indirectly) by the Supreme Leader (again, not Diana Ross). In the case of the recent presidential election, there were allegations of poll fraud, leading to the ‘desired’ outcome of Ahmadinejad being elected to a second term. This is not the first time allegations of fraud have been raised, incidentally.

7. Another One Bites The Dust (Queen)
Kinda self-explanatory, Walski thinks...

6. Smells Like Teen Spirit (Nirvana)
One thing Walski noticed about the protesters - their youth. Ok, maybe not teenagers, but you get the general idea. No? Live with it.

5. Loser (Beck)
What some Iranians probably call certain prominent personalities in government. True of any government anywhere, in all likelihood.

4. Any song by GREEN Day or GREEN JELLŸ, or Rev. Al GREEN
It's being called the Green Protest. If it goes as far as Walski suspects it might, it may one day be called the Green Revolution.

3. Won’t Get Fooled Again (The Who)
The Iranians successfully replaced one tyrannical regime with another tyrannical regime. Let’s hope that it’s a case of once bitten… and that they won’t be fooled again.

2. Na Na Na Na Hey Hey Goodbye (the Crazy Frog version)
The song was originally done by a group called Steam in the 60’s – Walski has chosen this particular version because it’s extra annoying. Just like how many Iranians view their government.

And the Number One song to be included in the new Iranian Revolution compilation album…

The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
(Gil Scott Heron)

In all likelihood, it will be the LEAST publicized revolution - since all media will probably NOT be allowed to cover it. Kinda like how it is currently in Iran, where foreign journalists have pretty much been under a lockdown.

So there you have it – 10 hits to remember the possible Green Revolution by. Coming to a record store near you. Probably sooner than you expect!

Click here for the full post......

Class

Technorati tags: Commentary, Zaid Ibrahim, Adnan Yaakob, Wolf In Sheep's Clothing

Walski's pre-post forenote: This post has kinda been brewing in the cobwebs of Walski’s to-be-completed pile for about a week, and will probably seem dated. It’s been kind of a busy week, and when that happens, posts don’t get completed in a timely manner. You might even say that this post is “so last week”. And you would be absolutely correct.

A simple 5-letter word like class can have numerous meanings. Amongst its numerous meanings, class can mean a division or rating based on grade or quality (via Mirriam-Webster).

And that’s the definition that Walski would like to focus on in this post.

When talking about people, too, class can be a defining factor. Particularly when trying to dichotomize a population, based on economic factors. Such as that shown in the diagram on the right – albeit, based on the structure of American society. But you get the picture.

In a society that has historically been feudalistic, Malaysia being one of them, we generally still identify station in life according to class. And there are many categories – too many for Walski to bother listing out.

And being that Walski tends to be somewhat egalitarian in his outlook, he simply categorizes people as those with Class, and those with No Class.

Especially when it comes to politicians…
(Class in the world of No Class politics, in the full post)

To be able to appreciate politicians with Class, it is usually helpful to examine those totally bereft of it. And for the present moment, no other politician epitomizes No Class, than the current Menteri Besar (Chief Minister) of Pahang, Adnan Yaakob.

Who can forget this classic clip (courtesy of Tumpang Sekole…?, via YouTube).

This politician is one that is known to shoot his mouth off – as opposed to speaking his mind – there’s a big difference between the two. Adnan, in commenting about former UMNO member Zaid Ibrahim joining PKR, said that Zaid was a “wolf in sheep’s clothing” (via Bernama). Walski does wonder if that makes Adnan Yaakob a wolf in wolf’s clothing…

"Before he was in the Cabinet for a short duration and tried to be a champion of democracy and freedom, but see what he has done against the government," he told reporters after attending a taichi exercise programme with the people, here today.
(source: Bernama)

Speaking of taichi, Adnan, who had been named as defendant in a lawsuit by Seruan Gemilang Makmur Sdn Bhd for breach of contract pertaining to a logging concession deal (as Pahang’s Chief Minister), has since refused to pay the compensation amounting to RM 63 million, as ordered by the courts. He has since, however, managed to obtain a stay.

You know, this talk about wolves in sheep’s clothing and all, made Walski remember this classic Gary Larson cartoon, from the now defunct The Far Side series.

But be that as it may, as Walski mentioned earlier, it is useful to look at No Class, in order to understand Class. Also partly because in Malaysia, there really aren’t that many politicians whom Walski consider have a lot of it.

And therefore, our case study is, not unexpectedly, Zaid Ibrahim – the target of Adnan “No Class” Yaakob’s blinkered party-line accusations. Zaid was, of course, formerly from UMNO (until he was sacked from the party late last year), and also formerly the de facto Law Minister – a post he quit from in protest of the abuse of the Internal Security Act.

To Walski, if there were any politician that could be said to have Class, it would be Zaid Ibrahim. Sure, there are those out there who are dead-set against Zaid, simply because of his liberal views on certain matters. Well, Walski has pretty liberal views, too. So, live with it.

In any case, this is what Zaid Ibrahim had to say in rebuttal (originally in Bahasa Malaysia here, translated by The Edge, via Malaysia Today):

Responding to Pahang Menteri Besar Tan Sri Adnan Yaakob's description of him as "a sheep in wolf's clothing", Zaid said he was surprised by the hatred from Adnan.

"Adnan is constantly accusing and insulting me. Some people say that he was one of the strongest proponents of my sacking from Umno," said Parti Keadilan Rakyat's latest high-profile signing.

"I've never being involved with any dodgy land or logging deals in Pahang hence I'm surprised by his attacks," Zaid wrote in his blog today.

The former minister also said that "anyone who seeks change such as eradicating corruption and curbing the abuse of powers or arguing against the Internal Security Act is seen as an Umno enemy". Adnan, said Zaid, had also complained that he had enriched himself through his relationship with Umno and Barisan Nasional.

"When Umno leaders are upset with me they constantly raise this issue. Nevertheless, I've always maintained that I'm neither rich nor was made rich by Umno.

"But since this is a recurring accusation, I suggest that the government repeals the Official Secrets Act and declassify all information pertaining to government contracts, projects and shares given out to ministers, former ministers, chief ministers and other Umno leaders and their families," Zaid wrote.
(source: PDF of a report in The Edge, via Malaysia Today)

No angry or insulting rhetoric - just a straight, in your face, gentlemanly rebuttal. Now that’s what Walski calls Class. The original Bahasa Malaysia piece by Zaid Ibrahim can be read here (via his blog).

But Walski does wonder if The Edge had really meant “sheep in wolf’s clothing” when they wrote their report… kinda like saying “Lipatan dalam gunting”, or “Batu di sebalik udang”…

Zaid joining PKR is probably something not unexpected. Still, it is a scary development as far as UMNO is concerned, primarily because now it brings about even more speculation as to whom else will cross over. Plus, it doesn’t do one iota of good for UMNO’s image.

We live in interesting times, people – the development politic is likely to get more and more interesting in the coming weeks, months and years. Whom else as high profile might we see crossing the Styx of Malaysian politics in the near future?

Whomever it may be, Walski hopes that they bring across Class…

Click here for the full post......

Farish One-on-One (Part 3)

Technorati tags: History, Malaysia, Communal Relations, Ethnicity, Religion

Related posts:
► Farish One-on-One (Part 1)
► Farish One-on-One (Part 2)

Finally, the long-awaited (and slightly delayed) third, and final, installment of the Malaysiakini exclusive interview with Dr. Farish A. Noor.

Since Walski thinks that you should watch the video (in fact, all three parts) for yourself, the 4 key words in part 3 that you should pay attention to, and strike him as being extremely relevant if we ever want to solve our own Malaysian problem: courage, truth, reconciliation and honesty. 
(some final thoughts on this series, in the full post)

Not to be ostentatious or anything like that, knowing that many of us are victims of a horrendous English language education, courtesy of our convoluted, yet broken, system of education, there is one word Farish has used that you may have a tad bit of difficulty with.

And that word is primordial. As with many words in the English language, it has a few meanings, depending on context. In the context of the interview, what Farish is saying is that our “existing in, or persisting from, the beginning” attachment to race and/or religion is continually getting stronger in Malaysia, evidenced by the kind of discourse we keep hearing, be it political or otherwise.

In other words, we are regressing, and not moving forward, as a nation. That is something very worrying for Walski. He thinks that many of you feel the same way.

Remember the four keywords Walski mentioned earlier? They are actually four very important concepts that we, collectively as Malaysians, MUST adopt if we ever want to move forward progressively.

Forget 1Malaysia – which is actually a good, albeit rehashed, concept, but with so many caveats that it has the net effect of bringing us back to square one.

Again, Walski urges you to view the video in its entirety. Then, ask yourself this question:

If South Africa and Indonesia can both overcome their painful histories, why the heck can’t we?

Click here for the full post......

A letter from Iran

Technorati tags: Politics, Iran, Green Revolution, Citizen Protest, Elections

Walski was alerted to via Twitter – hat-tip to @chinhuatw. Facebook users can read the posted letter here.

It’s a letter received from an individual, recounting what happened in Tehran yesterday, June 15th, 2009. Walski has edited it for readability and emphasis (plus the added pictures), but otherwise the contents are intact.

A letter I received from Iran right now... Be warned, not light reading.... 

Citizen in Tehran* reports his own observations on the course of events of 15th June 2009 in Tehran.

I left my home in Tajrish along with my family at 3 p.m. We went down Valiast Street which is the main northern-southern avenue in Tehran and entered the Evin Exp'way which leads to Enghelab Street. We knew that people are supposed to gather in Enghelab Sq. (Revolution Sq.) at 4 and march toward Azadi Sq. (Freedom Sq.). From Gisha Bridge onwards, we saw people walking down. Cars were blowing their horns and people were showing victory sign. We went to Navvab Street and parked our car at the end of the street. Then we took a taxi to bring us back to the Enghelab Street. On our way, near Jomhouri Sq. (Republic Sq.), I saw a group of about 20 militia with long beards and batons on motorbikes.

My hand was out of the car window with a little green ribbon (the sign of reformists) around my finger. One of the militia told me to throw that ribbon away. I showed him a finger. All of a sudden, about 15 people attacked me inside the car. They beat me with their batons and wanted to pull me out. My wife and my daughter who were sitting in the back seat cried and hold me tight. I also hold myself tight on the chair. They wanted to shatter the car windows. The driver went out and explained that he is a taxi and we are his passengers and he has no fault. After about 5 minutes,they left. My elbow hurts severely. Then, a young man from their group came and kissed my elbow! I told him: You know, I don't hate you. I am like you with the only difference that I know more and you are ignorant. He apologized and left.

We joined the crowd in Enghelab Street.

Read carefully:

(the rest of this letter, in the full post)

What I saw today was the most elegant scene I had ever witnessed in my life. The huge number of people were marching hand in hand in full peace. Silence. Silence was everywhere. There was no slogan. No violence. Hands were up in victory sign with green ribbons. People carried placards which read: Silence.

Old and young, man and woman of all social groups were marching cheerfully. This was a magnificent show of solidarity. Enghelab Street which is the widest avenue in Tehran was full of people.

I was told that the march has begun in Ferdowsi Sq. and the end of the march was now in Imam Hossein Sq. to the further east of Tehran while on the other end people had already gathered in Azadi Sq. The length of this street is about 6 kilometers. The estimate is about 2 million people.

On the way, we passed a police department and a militia (Baseej) base. In both places, the doors were closed and we could see fully-armed riot police and militia watching the people from behind the fences.

Near Sharif University of Technology where the students had chased away Ahmadinejad a few days ago, Mirhossein Mousavi (the reformist elect president) and Karrubi (the other reformist candidate spoke to people for a few minutes which was received by cries of praise and applause. I felt proud to find myself among such a huge number of passionate people who were showing the most reasonable act of protest. Frankly, I didn't expect such a political maturity from emotional Iranians who easily get excited.

My family and I had put stickers on our mouths to represent the suppression. Placards that people carried were different; from poems by the national poet Ahmad Shamlu to light-hearted slogans against Ahmadinejad. Examples include: " To slaughter us/ why did you need to invite us / to such an elegant party" (Poem by Shamlu). " Hello! Hello! 999? / Our votes were stolen" or " The Miracle of the Third Millenium: 2 x 2 = 24 millions" (alluding to the claim by Government that Ahmadinejad obtained 24 million votes) , "Where is my vote?" , " Give me back my vote" and many other.

We arrived in Azadi Square where the entire square was full of population. It is said that around 500,000 people can be accommodated in this huge square and it was full. Suddenly we saw smoke from Jenah Freeway and heard the gunshot. People were scared at first but then went forward.

I just heard the gunshots but my sister who had been on the scene at that part told me later that she saw 4 militia came out from a house and shot a girl. Then they shot a young boy in his eye and the bullet came out of his ear. She said that 4 people were shot. At least one person dead has been confirmed. People arrested one of the Baseeji militia but the three others ran away when they ran out of bullet.

At around 8 we went back on foot. On the way back people were still in the street and were chanting Allah Akbar (God is Great).

I was coming home at around 2 a.m. In parkway, I saw about ten buses full of armed riot police parked on the side of the street. Then I saw scattered militia in civil clothes with clubs in hand patrolling the empty streets. In Tajrish Square, I saw a very young boy (around 16) with a club who was looking at the cars to see if he can find something to attack. I don't know how and under what teachings can young boys change into militia.

I came home. Tomorrow, people will gather again in Valiasr Square for another peaceful march toward the IRIB building which controls all the media and which spreads filthy lies.

The day before Yesterday, Ahmadinejad had hold his victory ceremony. Government buses had transported all his supporters from nearby cities. There was full coverage of that ceremony where fruit juice and cake was plenty. A maximum of 100,000 had gathered to hear his speech. These included all the militia and the soldiers and all supporters he could gather by the use of free TV publicity.

Today, at least 2 million came only relying on word of mouth while reformists have no newspaper, no radio, no TV. All their internet sites are filtered as well as social networks such as Facebook. Text messaging and mobile communication was also cut off during the demonstration. Since yesterday, the Iranian TV was announcing that there is no license for any gathering and riot police will severely punish anybody who may demonstrate.

Ahmadinejad called the opposition as a bunch of insignificant dirt who try to make the taste of victory bitter to the nation. He also called the western leaders as a bunch of "filthy homosexuals". All these disgusting remarks was today answered by that largest demonstration ever. Older people compared the demonstration of today with the Ashura Demonstration of 1979 which marks the downfall of the Shah regime and even said that it outnumbered that event.

The militia burnt a house themselves to find the excuse to commit violence. People neutralized their tactic to a large degree by their solidarity, their wisdom and their denial to engage in any violent act.

I feel sad for the loss of those young girls and boys. It is said that they also killed 3 students last night in their attack at Tehran University residence halls. I heard that a number of professors of Sharif University and AmirKabir University (Tehran Polytechnic) have resigned.

Democracy is a long way ahead. I may not be alive to see that day. With eyes full of tear in these early hours of Tuesday 16th June 2009, I glorify the courage and bravery of those martyrs and I hope that their blood will make every one of us more committed to freedom, to democracy and to human rights.

Viva Freedom, Viva Democracy, Viva Iran

p.s.: If you find this report of any value, please share it with as many people as possible. Facebook is filtered and internet is very slow in Iran. Please somebody put this on Facebook.

* – actual name of the author has been removed

Walski will take it at face value that this did indeed come out of Tehran somehow. It exemplifies one important thing: that people can only take so much crap.

It’s also a lesson to those who think that staying in power via rigged elections, and then fabricating “people’s support” as “proof”, will stay in power indefinitely.

Finally, it’s an indication that even the people who have to endure “guided democracy” want the real thing instead. And Walski ain’t talkin’ about Coca Cola.

It may be a long time before the people of Iran can rid themselves of the self-inflicted shackles they put on themselves almost a generation ago. But you can’t hold down the will of the people indefinitely…

Click here for the full post......