In need to find something?
Custom Search
Related Posts with Thumbnails
Showing posts with label History. Show all posts
Showing posts with label History. Show all posts

Monday, December 31, 2012

Coming clean for 2013

Technorati tags: , , ,

In a few hours' time we'll be ushering in a new year. To say the least, it's been an interesting 12 months.

On a personal level, 2012 has been challenging for many reasons. High on the list would be his change of vocation, from the world of process automation and safety to the world of art. The circumstances of this change aren't important. Rather, what's more pertinent is the fact that as we traverse through life, change is the only constant.

As cliche as that may sound, it's a truism that we cannot escape from. Whether we like it or not, the world around us changes every waking (and sleeping) moment. And the truth is, either we embrace and adapt to change, or have our paradigms shifted for us - without a clutch. 

And driver's of manual transmission automobiles know very well how painful shifting gears without a clutch is. Trust Walski on this one - having your paradigms shifted for you, against your will, can be as painful, if not more.

As usual, Walski digresses.

What he really intended to do when he first started writing this post was to do a quick summary of the good, the bad, and the ugly that was the year 2012.

But he's since changed his mind.

Instead, Walski felt that it was time to come clean about something, that may serve as the answer to many a reader's question. Perhaps. In any case, it's a question that deserves to be answered before the clock strikes 2013.

Who IS Walski69? 
(the real Walski69, and more, in the full post)

My real name is S. Jamal Al-Idrus (via Facebook), or just plain Jamal to friends. In short, I'm nobody - certainly not a celebrity of any kind, or anyone whose name you should know, unless you have actually met me in person.

And yes, this will be one of the few times I write something for this blog not in the third person, as Walski usually does.

I came to this decision to reveal my identity after a conversation with a close friend of mine, who IS someone well-known. A journalist, in fact, who has managed to remain true to his craft, reporting with integrity and fairness. 

That conversation was the last check mark in the consideration mental checklist of whether or not to reveal the person behind Walski69. The realization came to me that since I never really hid my identity - anyone could connect the dots if they wanted to - there really was no point in not coming clean.

And just who am I?

Well, as I mentioned earlier, in the bigger scheme of things, I am a nobody. I am merely a very concerned citizen of Malaysia who thinks that this country is going in a direction that's less than healthy. I am very concerned with the growing influence of religionists who aim to turn Malaysian into a theocratic fascist state.

I am a concerned citizen who despises the tacit movement to make personal sins a crime in the eyes of the law. I am a citizen who thinks that it's time to reclaim the civil liberties of citizenhood that have been trampled upon.

I am also a citizen who hates the fact that we, as Malaysians, are continually being dumbed down and forced to believe that freedom is a bad thing, and that faith is something in need of legislation.

I am what I am, and every characteristic you know of Walski is a facet of who I really am. To list down every single facet would be just repeating what you already know about me.

So there, done. Just in time for 2013.

But henceforth, don't expect posts written in the first person. I choose to continue blogging as Walski69, third person and all, because I rather like the pseudonym, and have no wish to put it to pasture anytime soon.

Writing in the third person, in my personal opinion, defocuses attention to the writer, and puts due emphasis on what's more important - the content and message that's being communicated. You are, of course, free to disagree. But that's the style I think best communicates what needs to be communicated.

For the record, I don't have any formal political affiliations with any party, as some may think. Yes, I do write things that are critical of BN, but that's only because time and time again they have proven to not be a political coalition that can take us forward without doing more damage to the nation in the process.

In a few hours, it will be 2013. As much as 2012 was interesting and eventful, I expect the coming year to be an even more exciting one.

And in the coming months, this blog shall continue to report my thoughts as I see them, as much as I can, when I can. Not anonymously, but pseudonymously, as Walski69...

Happy New Year 2013 to one and all...

Click here for the full post......

Thursday, March 22, 2012

Knowledge in the days post-Britannica

Technorati tags: , , , ,

In many of the more relaxed civilizations on the Outer Eastern Rim of the Galaxy, the Hitchhiker's Guide has already supplanted the great Encyclopaedia Galactica as the standard repository of all knowledge and wisdom, for though it has many omissions and contains much that is apocryphal, or at least wildly inaccurate, it scores over the older, more pedestrian work in two important respects. First, it is slightly cheaper; and second, it has the words "DON'T PANIC" inscribed in large friendly letters on its cover.
(source: The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy by Douglas Adams)

We can safely assume that when Douglas Adams wrote this passage, he had probably not foreseen the demise of the Encyclopedia Britannica print version. After all, Hitchhiker’s was published in the late 70s, well before the advent of Wikipedia, what is to the Britannica that HG2G is to the Galactica.

At least in this pan-dimension, where mice are simply just furry little creatures with very little knowledge of the actual history of cheese.

But that aside, the definitive tussle between the Encyclopaedia Galactica and HG2G in the fictional realm of the universe bears some parallels to real-world comparisons between the 32-volume paper edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica, and the availability of information via the Internet. Primarily when comparing the unwieldy and voluminous Britannica with Wikipedia.

For one thing, although it doesn’t usually emblazon the words “Don’t Panic” across its website, Wikipedia is free, while Britannica sets you back in the region of USD 1,400 for the beautifully bound printed set, or USD 70 per year for an online subscription (source: Reuters).

While that's quite obvious to most people (except maybe for the quantum of price difference), another similarity is less frequently mentioned: both the Hitchhiker’s Guide To The Galaxy and Wikipedia are peer-edited.
(Knowledge, the Universe , and more [but not quite Everything], in the full post)

In other words, they both leverage on the almost limitless resource of everyday knowledge from everyday peer experts, and not on the limited human resource that the more established encyclopedia houses have to rely on.

And since just about everyone is connected to the Internet these days, anyone with domain expertise in a particular subject can contribute. Much like how Ford Prefect was a contributor to HG2G, even Walski has contributed something to Wikipedia (albeit very minor).

True, the open nature of Wikipedia makes it open to abuse, but most misinformation is quite quickly detected (usually within minutes). But at least it has more to say about Mother Earth than just “Mostly Harmless”, making it a better resource than even the HG2G. In fact, comparing it to the Britannica, Wikipedia wins hands down in discussing this now popular phrase (see the Britannica version here).

But, Walski digresses…

A few days ago, he received an e-mail with a request to share an infographic about the now ubiquitous knowledge site. It represents a quick reference, single-glance look at everything you’ve always wanted to know about Wikipedia (but didn’t have Jimmy Wales’ mobile number).

Wikipedia
Via: Open-Site.org

When was the last time you entered a public library? Walski can’t even remember when he last did. It must have been over 20 years ago when he was still in college.

The biggest difference between paper-bound knowledge and the online kind is the speed of how information can be updated. As we’ve seen with many recent events (such as The Arab Spring, and the current Syrian Uprising, via Twitter and Facebook), we are able to keep ourselves in the know, almost instantaneously.

Similarly with knowledge-based information on Wikipedia – It is a lot more up to date compared with what we can find in paper-bound encyclopedias. Even the online version of Encyclopedia Britannica kind of lags behind, somewhat.

Best of all, you don’t run the risk of having pages of your expensive encyclopedia getting the black marker treatment, something that still happens regularly in Malaysia to selected print publications deemed “undesirable” for our consumption.

Some might think that Wikipedia is low-brow and pedestrian compared to the beautifully bound (and expensive) Encyclopedia Britannica. Some might think that knowledge can only be attained through the printed word. Well, Walski thinks that these some are wrong. Numbers don’t lie, and the increased acceptance within the academic circles says it all.

The more access we have to information, the more opportunity we have to turn the information we ingest into knowledge.

As Farish A. Noor wrote in his essay yesterday (via The Malaysian Insider), “…with knowledge, it’s like we have a magical box that can expand and keep expanding. No matter how much we read, we can read more, learn more, remember more. And with that we grow into better, more knowledgeable and wiser people".

In essence, therefore, it’s the wealth and breadth of information that’s important. It cannot be denied that the Internet, through sites such as Wikipedia – and yes, even the online version of Encyclopedia Britannica – provides us with just that.

There is another similarity between the Hitchhiker’s Guide To The Galaxy and Wikipedia that has thus far gone unmentioned. Walski’s not sure whether Jimmy Wales is a fan of HG2G or not, but Wikipedia embodies one very important lesson that Walski learned from the writing of the late great Douglas Adams throughout the HG2G series of books.

And it is upon this very important precept that Walski chooses to end this post:

Share and Enjoy!

Click here for the full post......

Thursday, October 06, 2011

QE2: We Are Not At All Amused...

Technorati tags: , , ,

The Queen looking not at all amused, originally from The Telegraph, image hosting by Photobucket Walski got the following (spoof) e-mail earlier in the day, and he thought it  imperative that it be shared with all of you, post haste.

Why?

Simply because Malaysia, too, is a former colony (according to popular belief), and going by the e-mail, plus the way things are going in our nation today, Walski would not be at all surprised if we got the same kind of message from Her Royal Highness one day...

Email from the Queen - an important announcement regarding the USA:

To the citizens of the United States of America from Her Sovereign Majesty Queen Elizabeth II

In light of your immediate failure to financially manage yourselves and also in recent years your tendency to elect incompetent Presidents of the USA and therefore not able to govern yourselves, we hereby give notice of the revocation of your independence, effective immediately. (You should look up 'revocation' in the Oxford English Dictionary.)

Her Sovereign Majesty Queen Elizabeth II will resume monarchical duties over all states, commonwealths, and territories (except Kansas, which she does not fancy).

Your new Prime Minister, David Cameron, will appoint a Governor for America without the need for further elections.

Congress and the Senate will be disbanded.  A questionnaire may be circulated sometime next year to determine whether any of you noticed.

To aid in the transition to a British Crown dependency, the following rules are introduced with immediate effect:
(The Queen’s 15-point plan to re-take the USA, in the full post)

  1. The letter 'U' will be reinstated in words such as 'colour,' 'favour,' 'labour' and 'neighbour.'  Likewise, you will learn to spell 'doughnut' without skipping half the letters,  and the suffix '-ize' will be replaced by the suffix '-ise.'  Generally, you will be expected to raise your vocabulary to acceptable levels.  (look up 'vocabulary').
  2. Using the same twenty-seven words interspersed with filler noises such as ''like' and 'you know' is an unacceptable and inefficient form of communication. There is no such thing as U.S. English. We will let Microsoft know on your behalf.  The Microsoft spell-checker will be adjusted to take into account the reinstated letter 'u'' and the elimination of  '-ize.'
  3. July 4th will no longer be celebrated as a holiday.
  4. You will learn to resolve personal issues without using guns, lawyers, or therapists.  The fact that you need so many lawyers and therapists shows that you're not quite ready to be independent.  Guns should only be used for shooting grouse.  If you can't sort things out without suing someone or speaking to a therapist, then you're not ready to shoot grouse.
  5. Therefore, you will no longer be allowed to own or carry anything more dangerous than a vegetable peeler.  Although a permit will be required if you wish to carry a vegetable peeler in public.
  6. All intersections will be replaced with roundabouts, and you will start driving on the left side with immediate effect.  At the same time, you will go metric with immediate effect and without the benefit of conversion tables.   Both roundabouts and metrication will help you understand the British sense of humour.
  7. The former USA will adopt UK prices on petrol (which you have been calling gasoline) of roughly $10/US gallon.  Get used to it.
  8. You will learn to make real chips.  Those things you call French fries are not real chips, and those things you insist on calling potato chips are properly called crisps.  Real chips are thick cut, fried in animal fat, and dressed not with catsup but with vinegar.
  9. The cold, tasteless stuff you insist on calling beer is not actually beer at all.  Henceforth, only proper British Bitter will be referred to as beer, and European brews of  known and accepted provenance will be referred to as Lager.  New Zealand beer is also acceptable, as New Zealand is pound for pound the greatest sporting nation on earth and it can only be due to the beer.  They are also part of the British Commonwealth - see what it did for them. American brands will be referred to as Near-Frozen Gnat's Urine, so that all can be sold without risk of further confusion.
  10. Hollywood will be required occasionally to cast English actors as good guys.  Hollywood will also be required to cast English actors to play English characters.  Watching Andie Macdowell attempt English dialogue in Four Weddings and a Funeral was an experience akin to having one's ears removed with a cheese grater.
  11. You will cease playing American football.  There are only two kinds of proper football; one you call soccer, and rugby (dominated by the New Zealanders).  Those of you brave enough will, in time, be allowed to play rugby (which has some similarities to American football, but does not involve stopping for a rest every twenty seconds or wearing full kevlar body armour like a bunch of nancies).
  12. Further, you will stop playing baseball.  It is not reasonable to host an event called the World Series for a game which is not played outside of America.  Since only 2.1% of you are aware there is a world beyond your borders, your error is understandable.  You will learn cricket, and we will let you face the Australians (World dominators) first to take the sting out of their deliveries.
  13. You must tell us who killed JFK.  It's been driving us mad.
  14. An internal revenue agent (i.e. tax collector) from Her Majesty's Government will be with you shortly to ensure the acquisition of all monies due (backdated to 1776).
  15. Daily Tea Time begins promptly at 4 p.m. with proper cups, with saucers, and never mugs, with high quality biscuits (cookies) and cakes; plus strawberries (with cream)when in season.

God Save The Queen!

Click here for the full post......

Sunday, September 11, 2011

Ten Years Later...

Technorati tags: , , , ,

Time flies, doesn’t it? It’s been ten years since September 11, 2001, better known as 9/11.

Walski wrote at length about his thoughts five years ago; thoughts that he has no intention of repeating five years later today. If you like, you can re-read them here, and those from one year ago here.

Instead, let us reflect on the world we live in, as a result of what happened that fateful day, and what has transpired since. There is one song that embodies some of the feelings Walski has relating to 9/11, which he’d like to share with you.

There are specific reasons why Walski chose this particular song. But none of them have to do with losing his creed, just like the song really has nothing to do with religion... 
(9/11 thoughts a decade later, and more, in the full post)

As is typical when September 11 rolls along, you’ll hear all kinds of analyses, thoughts, rememberances, blame-storming, etc. Ad nauseum. And so Walski will refrain from doing that. Or, at the very least, try not to.

Fortunately, the events of that day hasn’t caused Walski to totally lose faith in mankind, nor has he lost the belief that people are basically good – regardless of creed, ethnicity or nationality.

The epiphany that hit Walski that day, more than anything else, is the realization of how powerful an emotion hate can be. Because he believes that at the root of what happened that day is nothing other than hate.

Any faith is essentially good. But when hate manifests itself, no creed is spared from the potential of being distorted to do bad things. Evil things.

R.E.M.’s Losing My Religion is not about faith, but it is about something unrealized or unachieved. Specifically, the song is about unrequited love. It’s a pining and yearning for something that you know might not be within reach.

Walski has a similar pining and yearning. However, it’s not love that he yearns for, but the elimination of hate.

He senses that the atmosphere of hate is on the increase here in Malaysia. And it seems to stem partly from the helplessness of not being able to change things for the better. There’s hate in how we conduct our politics, from all sides of the political divide. Making it worse is the impression Walski gets that in order to be successful in politics, one must have the ability to instill hate in one’s supporters of the ubiquitous other, whatever that other might happen to be.

In some cases, that "other" is whoever is on the other side of the political divide, and in other cases, it’s those who profess a different faith.

The last thing Walski wants to see is all that hate, which in turn fuels more hate, come to an unstoppable pinnacle, causing the haters to go on an uncontrollable hate rampage. And that, in essence, is how Walski sees the events of 9/11, half the world away, a whole decade later – uncontrolled hate manifested.

If there's one single lesson we Malaysians can learn from 9/11, it is that hate, assisted by the incredible power of bad ideas, can manifest itself into something destructive.

The destructive forces unleashed one decade ago today not only changed the New York City skyline, it changed the way we view the world we live in. Hate triumphed on that day, in more ways than we can imagine.

It silently perpetuates itself to this day, cleverly disguised, rearing its ugly head ever so subtly in forms not easily distinguishable.

If we can successfully eliminate hate from our lives, the world once again will change. This time, though, it’ll be for the better. It will really be the end of the world as we know it...

But this time around, you’ll really feel fine...

Click here for the full post......

Saturday, September 03, 2011

A funny thing happened on the way to the present...

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

Stylized image of Winston Churchill, originally from Wikipedia. Image hosting by Photobucket. It is often said that history is written by the victors. To be precise, Winston Churchill said that, or so it is popularly believed – there seems to be some dispute over this, as Walski discovered.

But assuming Churchill was the one who said it, the world today remembers the man as a successful war-time Prime Minister of Great Britain. In fact, many consider Winston Churchill to be one of history’s most successful wartime leaders.

The question is, though, if the Allies had not won the war in Europe, and Hitler had triumphed instead, would Churchill be remembered the same way today?

The answer: most probably not. In all likelihood he might be known as The Butcher of Hamburg, or some other nasty epithet like that (over 40,000 civilian deaths were documented in that bombing, by the way).

Walski, while in school, was never too interested in history, because he felt that it was boring. His interest in history emerged many, many years later when he discovered that the subject of history is much more than just important dates, people and places. What makes history interesting is the why and how.

And the truth is that there are many versions of why and how.

History, as it turns out, is very much a matter of perspective, apart from dates, people and places. And the popular perspective, as it turns out, really depends on who the victors are. When someone challenges the popular and official historical perspective of the victors, like what Mat Sabu did recently, feathers get ruffled, emotions stoked, and accusations of being a communist sympathizer emerge.
(inconvenient historical perspectives, and more, in the full post)

So, what was it that PAS deputy president Mohamad Sabu (more popularly known as Mat Sabu) said that ruffled UMNO feathers to the point of butt-hurt? Apparently, it is this:

For your information, Pisau.net is an unrepentantly pro-UMNO site (and part of the UMBecile network of sycophantic blogs), and so it’s no surprise that the communism context was added, despite the fact that communists or communism were never once mentioned. The key point Mat Sabu makes in the clip above – the history of our nation’s independence is seen very much from a British-friendly perspective, painting those who really fought against the British in bad light.

Today, the official view of this history is that UMNO and its Alliance partners were the sole champions of Malayan independence, with other contributors frequently left unmentioned, and quite often, even maligned.

In fact, just about everything Mat Sabu said in the video clip is factual:

  • the Bukit Kepong police station was a colonial British police station
  • the police officers were in the employ of the colonial British police force (this was in 1950)
  • Tok Janggut went against the British (over tax imposed, if not mistaken), and later declared a traitor by the then Kelantan Sultan, after British instigation
  • only those in the service of (or friendly to) the British colonial government were considered legitimate fighters for independence, while many others who were outright against the British colonialists and what the colonialists wanted, were labeled as terrorists and traitors

Walski wouldn’t go as far as to say, though, that the history of our independence is one big lie. He will agree that much of the popular history of that period is seen only from one perspective – that of UMNO’s, which in turn is a version of history that is very much British colonial-friendly.

Blogger Sakmongkol AK47 (himself an UMNO member and former Pahang state assemblyman) opines why the furor from all and sundry within UMNO over Mat Sabu’s remarks.

Why is UMNO concerned? I have touched on this slightly in my preceding article when I mentioned that PKMM was formed in 1945, one year earlier than UMNO. PKMM was the first Malay political party to clearly state Independence as its main vocation and raison d'ĆŖtre.

What is then alarming about Mat Sabu’s faux pas is the fear that it may lead to a widespread revision of history. If it snowballs into a widespread revision of history, then UMNO’s actual role MAY itself be diminished and it will no longer enjoy an unchallenged and monopolistic place in our nation’s history. Politically it will also mean that UMNO will find it increasingly difficult to claim absolute legitimacy as the nation’s only political force to have fought for MERDEKA. Its own heroes will be brought down to size.

(source: Sakmongkol AK47)

The story of Malaya's independence from the British is often times presented as a vanilla-flavored historical garden path. In truth, the whole story is a lot more colorful and closer resembles a garden maze, with numerous other players and factors involved, many of the paths leading to eventual dead ends. But these dead ends – primarily due to crackdowns by the British – are important, if we are to have a more holistic view of our nation’s history.

There is absolutely no dispute with the fact that UMNO and its Alliance partners played a role. The dispute is in the assertion that only they had a role to play. And why this assertion?

The answer, perhaps, lies in another quote, penned by a different man (emphasis by myAsylum):

'Who controls the past,' ran the Party slogan, 'controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.'
(source: Wikiquote)

The man was none other than George Orwell, and the book he authored, Nineteen Eighty-Four.

So yeah, “official history” can not be challenged, because it challenges the very position of the status quo, and how it got there. That’s the narrow conservative view, at least. And if you were to ask Walski, the mainstream is slowly but surely becoming narrow conservative as the years flow by.

Funny thing history – you can’t change what happened, but it sure as heck makes a difference from whose perspective the story is told...

Click here for the full post......

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Merdeka, 54 years on...

Technorati tags: , , , ,

Original image from Tunku Abdul Rahman, hosting by Photobucket On this day, 54 years ago, an important proclamation was made, signifying the birth of a new nation, at the time called Malaya. The history and events preceding that historic event at Stadium Merdeka over half a century ago may be somewhat contentious, as the contributions of many remain unspoken, or even obscured from public mind-share.

But we’ll leave that aspect of Merdeka for another day.

What Walsksi wants to focus on instead is what was proclaimed on that day, in 1957. It may have been before Walski was born, what was uttered that day is something that all Malaysians should know.

For within the text of the declaration lies something which all Malaysians today should have, but has been made illusive along the historical garden path that we’ve traversed.

That something, in fact, are two important precepts upon which this nation was founded. It is the same two precepts that, as the days go by, seem to become more in theory than in practice. 
(the Proclamation of Independence, and more in the full post)

Proclamation of Independence - 1957

The last paragraph of the proclamation contain these two precepts, principles upon which this nation was declared to be based on – liberty and justice.

Walski wonders, as we advance through the years, do these two precepts still hold true?

It’s something worth pondering upon as we celebrate our 54th year of independence. Personally, Walski thinks that while we still have some semblance of liberty and justice in practice, the true meaning of these two precepts have been forgotten.

Evident from the proclamation is that these two precepts were chosen over the multitude of principles that could have been mentioned. That the two precepts are mentioned as requisites to achieving happiness and welfare of the people is also something worth remembering.

As you ponder this, allow Walski to wish you Selamat Hari Kemerdekaan ke 54... may we one day achieve the goal of being one nation, with liberty and justice for ALL.

Click here for the full post......

Thursday, September 16, 2010

Malaysia Day: A Day for ALL Malaysians

Technorati tags: , , ,

Mrs. Walski’s home state Penang paved the way, and was the first state in Peninsular Malaysia to recognize September 16 as a holiday last year. This year onwards, the Federal Government has made it a national holiday. And about time, too.

Image taken from SK Bt 4 Jalan Apas website, hosting by PhotobucketFor the first time, Walski can really wish you Happy Malaysia Day!

Walski sees it more than just another public holiday. It’s a first step for those in Peninsular Malaysia to realize that Malaysia is made up of more than just the 10 states and Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur, Langkawi & Putrajaya.

For it was 47 years ago today that Malaysia as we know it really took shape…
(the importance of Malaysia Day, and more, in the full post)

Granted, on September 16, 1963 Singapore, too, gained their independence from Britain and became part of the federation until 1965. But the date is historic and deserves recognition as much as August 31, 1957 does.

For far too long, we in Peninsular Malaysia have taken September 16 pretty much for granted, and instead the focus has been entirely on August 31. Walski personally thinks that this in itself has played a role in how our national narrative has unfolded over the years. Similarly, our political narrative and landscape.

Ironically, it’s taken 47 years for today to have the recognition it rightly deserves. But the road to recognition hasn’t been a very obvious one. The catalyst for September 16 being recognized, in Walski’s opinion, has its roots in another important date: March 8, 2008 – the day Malaysia realized that the country would still “survive” without BN having a ⅔ majority in Parliament. Until then, the “specter” of doom surrounding losing ⅔ majority had become somewhat of an urban legend.

Granted, the politicking has continued since 3-08 rather relentlessly almost without pause, but Malaysia has survived very much intact. The “fear” was pretty much a fear of the unknown.

But Walski digresses. Another result of 3-08 was BN losing Kedah, Penang, Selangor, and for a short while, Perak. And it was in the Pakatan-ruled state of Penang (Pulau Pinang) that September 16 was first given recognition as a state holiday last year.

This year onwards, Malaysia Day becomes a full nationwide public holiday. And while no one in federal government will outright admit it, Walski suspects that if it weren’t for Penang and the other Pakatan states taking the lead, today would still remain a footnote in our national history narrative.

To commemorate September 16, there are a chockfull of activities going on, at least in Kuala Lumpur where Walski resides. One that deserves special mention will be this evening at Rumah Anak Bangsa Malaysia.

Registration for the program opens at 6:30pm, and an evening of meeting and celebrating the real birth of Malaysia with other Malaysians.

Another reason for attending the event is that today also marks the first anniversary of the Saya Anak Bangsa Malaysia initiative.

The event at Rumah Anak Bangsa Malaysia this evening will therefore be a double celebration: 47 years of Malaysia being a nation, as well as the first anniversary of an initiative to bring about a true Malaysian people (bangsa Malaysia).

Rumah Anak Bangsa Malaysia is located at 66 Lorong Setiabistari 1, Taman Bukit Damansara, 50490 Kuala Lumpur (link will bring up a new Google Map window). Incidentally, it’s the same house that used to be the Blog House.

Another event is the Sape Solidarity exhibition, film screening and performance, going on at Central Market Annexe (link will bring up a new Google Map window).

Image taken from the Central Market Annexe website, hosting by Photobucket

The Sape is a traditional stringed musical instrument that originates from Sarawak, sometimes also called the Borneo Lute. The highlight will be the live performance by Kilah Kuit, a well-known sape player, scheduled for 8pm tonight.

The Central Market Annexe will be hosting a number of events this coming weekend (September 18 & 19). You can check out the Annexe Gallery website for a full listing. Among the highlights, however, are Arts for Grabs Malaysia Day 2010, and an installment of the OtherMalaysia lectures, “TWO, THEN THREE, THEN FOUR COLOURS: A Potted History of the Malaysian Flag", by none other than Farish A. Noor.

Another celebration of today – MalaysiaKU : Celebrating Malaysia Day (via Facebook), happening at Bangkung Row (link will bring up a new Google Map window), located off of Jalan Maarof in Bangsar. There’s really a lot going on, so check out the invitation page on Facebook (see link above) for details.

One final thing that Walski would like to highlight is an initiative that has just been launched today, called Our Ideal Malaysia. It’s quite simple: the site allows Malaysians to express what we want to make this nation better. Suggestions will be collected between now and August 15th, 2011, after which these will be forwarded to the Prime Minister, heads of all political parties, as well as to the media for Malaysia Day 2011. Our Ideal Malaysia also has a companion Facebook page. So, if there are things about the country that bother you and you have suggestions on how to make Malaysia better, here’s your opportunity. In the coming days, Walski will be writing a bit more about this initiative.

All in all, a lot of positivity has so far emanated from Malaysia Day, which makes Walski happy. Perhaps, despite the vicious politicking that seems unending, ordinary Malaysians, of all walks of life, essentially wish for the same thing: an equitable and peaceful Malaysia. While it is disheartening that there are some who wish to retain the status quo where some Malaysians are “more equal than others” regardless of the consequence to the nation as a whole, Walski’s personal feel is that these people form a small minority.

He is certain, that the majority of Malaysians want our nation to progress and be great. There are, perhaps, a number of things that don’t work as well as they could. But to improve upon these things is not an insurmountable task.

But let’s not lie to ourselves – it won’t be easy either.

The key thing is to accept that in order to progress, we have to be willing to change. Without change, we remain stagnant, and to remain stagnant, we open ourselves up to the very real possibility of regressing.

Every journey starts with a single step, and the first small step can be taken today. That small step is to realize that regardless of which state you may come from, regardless of what creed you may belong to, and regardless of what shade of the human skin spectrum you might have acquired, we are all essentially Malaysians – one people with a collective wish to move forward positively as one nation.

And today is our day, when we celebrate her 47th birthday… as one Bangsa Malaysia.

Click here for the full post......

Saturday, September 11, 2010

Remembering the fallen

Technorati tags: , , , ,

In slightly more than 12 hours from now, New York City will see the dawn of another bitter anniversary – the attacks that happened on September 11, 2001.

September 11 Memorial, image taken from  Second Edition, hosting by Photobucket

Walski, like many others around the world, remembers exactly what he was doing when he first found out about the tragedy that happened 9 years ago. Let’s not get into the polemics of who was responsible, etc. A tragedy is a tragedy, regardless of whom it befalls.

Today also happens to be the second day of Eid-ul Fitr – Hari Raya Aidil Fitri to Malaysians. And perhaps while we visit one another and ingloriously feast (Malaysians love food, what else can Walski say?) perhaps it’s apt that we forget not the fallen who died that day.
(hate is easy, and more, in the full post)

But it wasn’t just American citizens who died that fateful day 9 years ago. All told, citizens from 54 other countries perished as well, including 4 from Malaysia:

  • Ang Siew Nya
  • Gerard Phillip*
  • Khoo Sei Lai
  • Vijayashanker Paramsothy
* unconfirmed, but remains on most 9/11 casualty lists

Of late, the controversy surrounding the September 11 attacks have been renewed, and centered around the proposal to build the Cordoba House, a few blocks away from the area known as Ground Zero, where the World Trade Center used to stand.

There are opponent and proponents for the cultural center, and Walski doesn’t really wish to get into the debate. The point is, however, that September 11 has officially been attributed to the Al-Qaeda terrorist collective, headed by the elusive (and some say imaginary) Osama bin Laden.

In the minds of some, and by association, however, the blame has been laid squarely upon the religion of Islam. In the United States, since the tragedy, there have been many reports of hate crimes against Muslims, or those “looked like Arabs” (including Sikhs with turbans). Some say that there has been a marked increase.

And as if to perpetuate this claim of blame upon the entire Muslim populace, one slightly loony pastor in Florida has plans to burn as many copies of the Holy Quran that he could find. Fortunately, the planned book burning, slated for today has been indefinitely postponed (via The Miami Herald).

To lay blame for the September 11 attacks upon all Muslims is, of course, as ridiculous as saying all Christians wish for nothing more than to burn the Quran and be hateful towards Muslims.

Image taken from MarioPiperni.com, hosting by Photobucket

One thing is clear though – as exemplified in the cartoon above – hate breeds hate. An act of hate (burning the Quran) will begat more hatred among Muslims worldwide, not just towards one off-kilter fringe pastor in Florida, but perhaps against all Christians.

It is therefore fortunate that the pastor has called off the burning amidst pressure from the majority of his countrymen (and women). Fortunate not so much because his act of hatred will inflame others and perpetuate the hate, but because what he intended to do is, in fact, dishonoring those who fell today 9 years ago.

We shouldn’t remember September 11 with hatred, because when we do, the real winners are those who thrive on hate and mayhem. Whoever they may be. Hate is all-consuming, and in the end it becomes a zero-sum game – everybody loses.

Don’t know about you, but Walski definitely doesn’t like to lose. Or, be a loser – what Walski feels people who intrinsically hate essentially are.

Nope. What he will do today is remember, with some amount of sadness, those who fell 9 years ago on this day. But at the same time, he will also be thankful to God for giving the majority of His children the world over the strength to not hate.

It’s very easy to hate. To understand, empathize with, and wishing upon others peace and love – that takes effort. But it’s effort worth making, as we remember the fallen as well as all the others who have suffered because of the events that took place nine years ago…

Click here for the full post......

Thursday, May 13, 2010

Reimagineering May 13

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

Well, it’s that time of year again, sports fans – May 13th, one of the blackest of days in our nation's history. Today marks the 41st anniversary of the tragedy, which happened a long time ago in 1969, when Walski was but a wee tot.

Speaking of sports, Malaysia beat Denmark 3-2 in the Thomas Cup 2010 quarter-finals last night. And what Walski witnessed during the tournament broadcast, and on Twitter, has some bearing on what this post is about. But more on that later on in the post.

So yeah, back to May 13th. And when this date approaches, without fail, there will be those who will habitually raise its specter, hinting in some ways that if certain status quos are not maintained, the tragedy just might re-occur. Usually in a “don’t provoke the hornet’s nest” kind of rhetoric.

Image taken from Malaysia Today, hosting by PhotobucketBanner for the now-aborted gathering (from Malaysia Today)

This year is no exception – the now indefinitely postponed gathering organized by an NGO who call themselves Gerakan Kebangkitan Rakyat, or GERTAK (which means “threaten” in Bahasa Malaysia), which was supposed to take place today in Terengganu, came under intense criticism for scheduling the gathering today. Of all days. And having a name like GERTAK doesn’t help a bit.

In all fairness, the NGO wasn’t formed specifically for the event today, and as indicated in their blog, was actually formed earlier this year on January 3rd. But going by the shenanigans that similar Malay-rights groups, like Perkasa, have pulled thus far, picking May 13 for their "Melayu Bangkit” (“Malays Arise”) event could be construed as provocative. No matter how innocuous the program was claimed to have been (emphasis by myAsylum).

“We are not threatening anyone. It’s just an event to remind the Malays of what had happened on that fateful day so it won’t happen again in the future.

“The Malays were united in the fight for independence but after that, at that point on May 13, the Malays were weak, divided. Our economic status was low,” said Razali in his own interpretation of the race riots during which hundreds were killed.

(source: The Malaysian Insider)

But herein lies the irony – anyone who was between, say 18 and 45, the likely age demographic of political activity in 1969, would today be between 59 and 86. Not exactly spring chickens, so to speak, nor likely to be at a very economically active age.

So, whom exactly are these painful memories, dredged up year after year, meant to be a reminder for? It’s as if this constant reminder is for no other purpose but to keep May 13 as a perpetual bogeyman, whose memory gets annually resurrected for reasons other than just remembrance.

And even if you weren’t even yet a glimmer in your parent’s eyes 41 years ago, you had damned well better “remember” this tragic event.

But just in case it escaped anyone, allow Walski to remind you that we’re no longer living in 1969. And neither is today’s socio-economic environment anywhere close to what it was 41 years ago.
(three initiatives towards reimagineering, and more, in the full post)

So anyways, fast forward to last night, during the Thomas Cup 2010 quarter-finals, where in the last game to settle the then 2-2 game score, Muhd Hafiz Hashim was up against Joachim Persson. Both in the indoor stadium, and on Twitter, Malaysians were cheering Hafiz on. Not as Malay Malaysians, Chinese Malaysians, Indian Malaysians or Dan-Lain-Lain Malaysians. But as Malaysians.

Not that Walski wishes to state the obvious, but sports is indeed a unifier. And it was a unified Malaysia that was cheering Hafiz on. And if there were in the audience (or on Twitter) any members of Perkasa, Gertak, or any of the Malay-only champions of whatever, they were there as Malaysians cheering the national team on.

Isn’t it time that we moved forward that way, as a truly united citizenry? Last night showed that it’s not something impossible to wish for.

41 years is long enough – nay, too damned long – to harbor and nurture a stigma that should have been put behind us long ago. It’s time we moved on

Malaysians will live through today, the 41st anniversary of a dark blotch on our nation’s history, doing many things. Being a week day, most of us will be at work, or fighting traffic to get to work, during most of the daylight hours.

Without a doubt, at least a handful of politicians will go to press with his or her thoughts about today’s. Some of them might be insightful, and as history has shown, some of them will undoubtedly be entertainingly asinine. And become fodder for hilarious Twitter hash tags that will last the remainder of the day, or even longer.

But there are three “events” happening today that Walski would especially like to highlight.

The first, and the only organized single event out of the three, is a talk series presented by Starbucks – Live & Inspire, which will be held tonight at 8pm at Level 2, Bangsar Village 2, Kuala Lumpur.

What makes it extra special is that this time around, Anas Zubedy will be the featured speaker. Anas has been a very active proponent of national unity, and through his company, Zubedy (M) Sdn Bhd, has been putting up unity full-page ads in The Star on key celebratory dates throughout the year. You will find one of those ads in The Star today.

This time around, in addition, he has started a campaign called Recolor May 13. The purpose is best explained in a posting Anas did on his blog this past Sunday.

Image hosting by Photobucket When reflecting on May 13, 1969, we can blame others for what happened, blame the situation, or we can choose to transform things for the better, to be change agents and constructively fill our hearts and minds with what needs to be done so May 13 does not ever happen again, and that no one uses the day to bring about fear and negativity.

What thoughts can we cultivate to make a difference to how May 13th is viewed? What actions can we take to shine a light on this day so it will forever be a day we learn from mistakes, a day we strengthen unity in our diversity and recommit to respecting one another and working together?

At zubedy we believe in re-coloring May 13 with all our brilliant hues, the many diverse peoples that we are, under this one great nation called Malaysia. We believe it is a day to reaffirm our shared values and traditions and rejoice in what unites us. A day for young and old to constructively talk about what makes us one people and how we can remain strong together.

(source: Anas Zubedy)

In conjunction with this campaign, two books will also be released, one by Anas himself, and the other by Dr. Chandra Muzaffar, of the International Movement for a Just World (JUST). Both of these books, plus the Recolor May 13 initiative, were highlighted in an article published last Tuesday in The Sun (on page 4, shown on the right – download a PDF copy), and today in The Star. Both publications are part of the Zubedy Unity Series.

The book by Dr. Chandra Muzaffar is entitled “A Plea for Empathy – The Quest for Malaysian Unity”, a collections of articles written by Dr. Chandra over a period of 34 years.

Anas’ book, “The Quran and I” chronicles his growing up as a Muslim in Malaysia, at the same time highlighting how universal values found in the Quran can be found through daily life experiences, and how a multi-cultural Malaysia is actually a fertile ground for personal growth.

Walski can personally attest to the fact that Anas, as a person, is one of the nicest people you could meet, and that his outlook in life is definitely inclusive – that each one of us has that unique something, which cumulatively as a whole is what makes Malaysia such a wonderfully unique place. And it’s exactly that diversity that we should celebrate and hold dear.

Which segue ways into the other two “events” for today. Both of which have to do with diversity, and incidentally, have both relied on a very important aspect of our 21st century lives to disseminate – social media. Now, you may have your dissenting opinions about social media prevalence in our day and age, and Walski has no intention to debate it here, but if you’re honest about it, you can’t dispute its potentials. One of which is to bring people together.

The first of the two, is May 13 – Malaysian Interracial Hook-up Day (via Facebook), organized by a group of young Malaysians who feel today shouldn’t be about dredging up painful memories and fear-mongering. In fact, quite on the contrary.

Image taken from the event's Facebook page, hosting by Photobucket It's about time that we reclaim May 13 for ourselves and tell people who want to divide us Malaysians to keep their mouth shut because WE ARE MOVING ON. We are moving on from racist ideologies and we are moving into a Malaysian ideology, one that respects and celebrates diversity and equality.

Come this May 13, 2010, throw away hatred and prejudice and hook-up with someone from a different race or religion or culture or colour! Wherever you are whether if you're in Malaysia or not, ajaklah your friend(s) out... Go for a movie or a nice dinner or to a nice beach or to a nice hotel (to errr... listen to err... music). Have twosomes, threesomes, foursomes, or x-somes anyway you like it! The more the merrier!

Interracial FTW!! \^.^/

(source: Facebook)

And unlike the Gertak event, which is targeting God-knows which age demographic, May 13 – Malaysian Interracial Hook-up Day is targeted at the young – and young at heart. It’s been often said that youth is wasted on the young – in this instance that precept is utterly WRONG, because it’s the young who seem to know better, want to move on, and are leading the way. By example.

The beauty about this initiative is that it’s not something big scale, everybody-in-one-designated-location old school kind of event thingy – it’s up to you to create a mini-gathering of your own, and to do your own thing. The importance of this initiative is not in the size of the event, but in the spirit of it – that we are, at the end of the day, in the same boat, sink or swim, through thick or thin. For Walski, that’s the real take-away.

The second via-social media initiative is something called May 13 Blogswarm (via Facebook. Again) - and guess what? If you’ve gotten this far, you’re in fact reading a participating entry! The origins of this initiative, before it landed on Facebook, can be found on this LiveJournal page.

I am proposing a blogswarm on May 13, about, well, May 13 1969! We know how it's been a bugbear for us since forever ago - on the one hand it's a reminder about what racial disunity is like, but on the other hand, politicians use it as a threat so we don't talk about racism in Malaysia. It means many different things to different people.

So on, or for May 13, we can all blog about whatever comes to mind when we think about May 13. For example:

- A history of what happened on May 13 as you understand it (use your own words, not Wikipedia's). How were you taught about May 13? Did you learn more later on that changed how you thought about it?
- If you have any relatives who was there and participating, or if YOU were there and participating, share your stories!
- How has Malaysia changed since 1969? How has it not changed?
- Since May 13 was caused by racial polarization, what do you think of race relations today?
- Do you think we're still divided? What examples of racism have you seen that tells us we're not past May 13 yet?
- Tell us how you really feel about the NEP!
- Talk about generational gaps in viewing May 13, or the absence thereof of remembering this date.
- How do you feel about the way government is being run right now? Do you have any recommendations on what really should happen?
- How do specific race-based government policies affect you and/or your loved ones?
- Poems, stories, essays about, on, set during, themed, around May 13.
- anything else you can think of to remember May 13.

Write in English, or Malay, or Chinese, or Tamil, or Malaysian-English, or bahasa pasar, or whatever you feel like writing in. I'll make a post so people can copy-paste their URLs and we can see what everyone else has written. If you want to write something but don't want to be linked, that's cool too! The point of the blogswarm is to encourage expression of our thoughts, not to get into internet arguments.

(source: LiveJournal)

And as what usually happens to great viral ideas, it caught on.

Image taken from May 13 Blogswarm page on Facebook, hosting by PhotobucketAs seen on the Malaysians LJ community, I'm inviting everyone to join in the May 13 Blogswarm. For too long, the spectre of May 13 has haunted us. So here's a challenge for May 13. Instead of burying it and pretending everything's hunky dory, let's talk about it.

What does May 13 mean to you? What do you know about May 13? Have we moved on since then? Have we stayed stuck in the past?

Tell us. Tell everyone. Do it in a Facebook note. Do it in your blog. Write a poem. Shoot a video. Joke about it. Cry about it.

Let's make May 13 a day to talk. And listen.

(source: Facebook)

So today, if you own a blog, blog about how you feel – it can touch on any of the ideas above, or just about how you feel May 13 should be regarded. And don’t forget to leave a link to your post in the comments here (or alternatively, leave a link at the May 13 Blogwarm Facebook page). If you have a Facebook account, write there. If you’re on Twitter, be sure to include the #swarm13may hashtag in your tweets.

Trust Walski on this one – there will be a whole lot of folks who will want to listen to your thoughts. And hopefully, learn and reflect.

Three great initiatives, all of them, each in its own way. But the underlying themes of all three – moving on, and unity, as a people.

Perhaps one day, May 13th will become Malaysia’s Unity & Reconciliation Day. And if Walski had his way, that’s what he would do. But until that happens officially, it really is up to us.

Some of us will probably continue to resurrect the ghosts of May 13, as organizations like Perkasa, Gertak, and what have you, have been doing, and in all likelihood, will continue doing for years to come. Well, let them – it’s their right, and if they choose to live in an anachronism, well let them be.

Walski, and he believes, a vast majority of other Malaysians, would prefer to move on in a manner more productive, reconciliatory, and unified. We are diverse in many ways, but lets make that diversity work for us, and not divide us.

It’s time for some serious reimagineering of that too-often evoked tragedy that was May 13, 1969. It happened, it’s history, and it’s time to move on.

And that time, sports fans, is now

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

Friday, May 07, 2010

Race Barometer

Technorati tags: , , , ,

Image taken from Openlibrary.org, hosting by Photobucket Most people in Malaysia put much importance on the question of ethnicity and/or race. For some reason, or reasons, that no one really has been able to explain to Walski satisfactorily.

But that’s the reality we have today – that for many people, ethnicity/race is important – like it or not, fully understand it or not. Despite the fact that the whole construct of Melayu/China/India/Dan-Lain-Lain, as it is today, is one that can probably be considered an imported one that we decided to keep.

But if you think about it, have inter-racial relations deteriorated only of late – post GE12, in particular? Well, if you were to ask Walski, his answer would be: it depends. On what? Well, primarily depending on what you hear and read about.

Which is where the media comes in. Be it print, traditional electronic or even new media (blogs and microblogging platforms such as Twitter), compared to a decade ago, we have a heckuva lot more sources of information available to us.

And what the media has to say about the health of race relations, and more importantly, how it chooses to report race-related matters in Malaysia, play an important role in shaping our own opinion with regards to race relations. “Reality” is many times shaped by how we view it.

And it’s not just Walski who thinks that the media plays a big role – the Center for Independent Journalism (CIJ) thinks so, too.

So much so that they’ve taken the trouble to put together a forum to discuss exactly this topic as part of their World Press Freedom Day celebrations.
(CIJ’s WPFD program, and more, in the full post)

CIJ website masthead, image hosting by Photobucket Although the actual World Press Freedom Day falls on May 3rd (last Monday), CIJ has decided that their program would be a bit later in the week.

Entitled “Building Peace Across Communities”, the program will be held on Saturday, May 8th, 2010 (from 10:30am to 1:30pm) at The Annexe Gallery, Central Market Annexe, Jalan Hang Kasturi, in KL.

Building Peace Across Communities” itself will be a forum, with four panelists from regional media organizations participating. As of the time of posting, the confirmed panelists are:

  • Ms Insany Syahbarwati, head of the Maluku Media Center, Ambon, Indonesia
  • Dr Mustafa K. Anuar, communication studies lecturer at Universiti Sains Malaysia
  • Ms Jacqueline Ann Surin, editor of The Nut Graph
  • Ms Prangtip Daoreung, Asian Public Intellectuals Fellow

The panel will answer a set of pre-prepared questions, as well as respond to questions from the floor, as outlined by CIJ in their program write-up that Walski received.

The background as to why this theme was chosen is perhaps best explained by CIJ themselves (emphasis by myAsylum):

52 years ago, on 1 September, newspapers heralded the birth of a new nation comprised of peoples of multiple ethnicities. Today, the media buzzword is 1Malaysia, a concept introduced by the government of the day as an affirmation of the various ethnic groups that make up the nation.

That the concept itself is needed five decades after Independence is a reflection of the deteriorating state of race relations in the country.

For media watchers, it brings to question the role that the media has played as both shaper and mirror of society, constrained as they may be by the sociopolitical and ownership demands of the environment in which it operates.

How has the media coverage of ethnic relations been? What are the challenges journalists face when it comes to reporting on matters that involve the apparently still-sensitive issue of ethnicity? What are the ways of providing space for meaningful discussion on ethnic issues without distilling the truth of the story? Is this issue of media representation of ethnic groups a concern across Malaysia or is it only a peninsular preoccupation?

Looking ahead, how can the media reflect the commonalities that the 1Malaysia concept strives to highlight above the differences that are nevertheless an essential part of what makes our nation? What are the lessons we can take from our neighbour Indonesia, which has experienced some of the most violent ethnic/religious conflicts in the region, but whose civil society organisations – including media – have risen to the challenge of mediating for peace?

(source: CIJ Publicity Note)

In addition to the forum, the program will also mark the launch of CIJ’s annual report, “Freedom of Expression in Malaysia 2009: An Annual Review by CIJ”. It will be interesting to see what CIJ has to say about the state of freedom of expression in Malaysia today. From what Walski has seen the last 12 months, the report is not expected to be very complementary.

Unfortunately, Walski won’t be able to attend due to other prior commitments, but he is certain that it will be an interesting program. So, if you have some time tomorrow morning, do make your way to the Central Market Annexe.

Walski’s personal view about the media – in any form – is this: every medium of information dissemination has its inherent bias. There’s really no escaping this. The question then becomes, how much bias? And that’s not an easy question to answer, because it will depend on our own individual world-view as consumers of information. On a rough scale, though, Walski rates the media we have today in Malaysia as ranging from “leaning towards”, to “blatantly biased”.

Because our individual world-views vary, a news organization that is objective in its reporting could be seen to be biased because it doesn’t support our own viewpoints and leanings.

And this is important to realize especially when it comes to issues that we, as a society, still regard as sensitive – in the context of Malaysia, race and religion. So of all the panelists mentioned, it would be the Indonesian experience that Walski would be most interested to hear, because they’ve gone through a recent period of heightened ethnic tension, and have survived it. ‘Recent’, of course, in the larger context of history, where a decade is not really considered a very long time.

Being a frequent visitor to Indonesia, however, Walski’s observation is that the best way forward is by being honest and objective – Indonesian media today is known to be quite no-holds-barred when it comes to reporting. And in the long run, he feels that Indonesians will be the better for it.

Nothing is swept under the carpet, to the nether regions of what you don’t know won’t hurt the powers that be. Yes, that’s Walski’s personal view, tinted with his own personal bias.

With the anniversary of the May 13th Tragedy less than a week away, we’re already starting to see the usual “reminders” by certain interested quarters, making use of the usual media channels, which in Walski’s book can be categorized in the “blatantly biased” bin. The difference today, compared to a decade ago, is that there are counter-voices aplenty via other media channels, questioning the need for these annual reminders.

Which is a good thing – taken as a whole, the availability of various channels of media, with various leanings, is good for a heterogeneous society such as ours. Certain opinions are tempered with counter-arguments, and everybody with something to say, has their say.

With the viciousness of the Hulu Selangor media politicking behind us, and with the anniversary of May 13, the CIJ program is definitely timely. And like Walski said earlier, if you’ve got the time, do attend.

But the 2 questions that remain in Walski's mind, however, are these: Exactly how fragile are race relations in Malaysia today? And if the media is used as a race relations barometer, how accurate a measurement does it really provide?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......

Wednesday, May 05, 2010

Book Review: What Your Teacher Didn't Tell You

Technorati tags: , , , , , ,

Front cover of Walski's own copy, image hosting by Photobucket What Your Teacher Didn’t Tell You: The Annexe Lectures (Vol. 1)
Author: Farish A. Noor
Publisher: Matahari Books
ISBN: 9834484534
EAN: 9789834484538
Paperback, 288 pages

At one point or another, history would have been part of the curriculum we were exposed to in school. Walski has to admit that when he was in school, history was never a subject he liked. In retrospect, it’s probably because of how it is taught – when, where, who, and what being the four things stressed most.

And being that Walski didn’t really excel in those subjects requiring lots of memorization, he tended to avoid history. To his discredit.

But that has changed over the last decade or so – and one of the reasons for that change has been Walski’s exposure to the many untold stories about our collective history – that of our nation, as well as that of the immediate region our country resides in. Things his teachers never told him about. And perhaps one of the most important sources of these obscured stories, as far as Walski’s concerned – Farish A. Noor.

It is unfortunate that the national and regional history most of us would have typically been exposed is quite rigid, and told from a rather narrow, and sometimes selfish, perspective. But this book aims to open our eyes to history that has been, for the most part, obscured, untold and, to some extent, withheld.

This book is a compilation of five Central Market Annexe lectures, delivered by Malaysia’s hippest academician, Farish Noor, between March 2008 and September 2009. Walski was fortunate enough to attend one of them, which appears as the second chapter in this book (“The Lost Tribes of Malaysia”).

But believe you Walski when he says this – if there were to be one, and only one, book you read this year, you need to make sure that it’s What Your Teacher Didn’t Tell You.
(history obscured and withheld, and more, in the full post)

So, why is this book so important? Before we delve into that in more detail, perhaps a look at why this book was put together might be useful, as a prelude to answering the question.

In the Introduction, Farish outlines two reasons why this book was published, and why (in Walski’s opinion) every Malaysian should read it. Firstly, there is (emphasis by myAsylum)

"...the urgent need for Malaysians to reclaim the histories, biographies, symbols, tropes, and markers that dot the narrative and discursive landscape of Malaysia from the clammy clutches of politicians, ideologues and soapbox orators who would otherwise be inclined to reduce the semiotic repertoire of our public discursive domain to simplified and essentialised totems that stand for a communitarian and divisive politics that is not only historically inaccurate, but politically dangerous."
(Introduction, pp. 12 - 13)

Back cover of Walski's own copy, image hosting by Photobucket Simply put, what we know of our past has been oversimplified and condensed into a mould meant to serve ulterior and narrow political motives. For example, little, if any, is ever spoken about the influences of Hindu and Buddhist cultures that have actually played a major role in forming what we know as “Malay” culture today. Similarly, the notions that Chinese and Indians only appeared on our landscape during late colonial times, as recent social ingredients that have made Malaysia multicultural – notions that play very well into the exclusivist political rhetoric that we hear all too often today in our nation.

The second reason why this book is important, is that our obscured history has for too long been only available, for the most part, to the academicians. Hence, the uniqueness of where this wealth of information was initially presented to the general public.

"... these lectures were delivered at Central Market Annexe Gallery with the intention of proving a point that ought to be made time and time again: that academia is not to be confined within the hallowed precinct of universities solely, but rather that knowledge-production is something that takes place in the social arena"
(Introduction, pg. 14)

In other words, the intent of this compilation is also to make our obscured histories accessible.

And what important information does this book make accessible to us?

As Walski had mentioned earlier, What Your Teacher Didn’t Tell You is a compilation of 5 lectures Farish delivered at the Central Market Annexe Gallery. It also includes one interesting “Bonus Chapter”.

The book starts off by lamenting what today is probably best known as an icon of “Ketuanan Melayu” – the keris – that wavy dagger often flayed around by certain politicians in heat. In “Pity The Poor Keris”, Farish walks us through the long, almost 2 millennia-old, history of a thoroughly misunderstood cultural icon. And in doing so, we begin to see how Hindu/Buddhist cultures of old have contributed to a culture most of us identify as having been “always” Islamic in origin and nature – the “Malay” culture.

Pity The Poor Keris” urges us to rediscover the blade’s multifaceted cultural origins, in an attempt to understand how our own culture evolved over the many centuries. The keris, as we discover, is much more than just an instrument of violence. And through our journey, we also discover how metropolitan our region was prior to the arrival of Western colonialists, whose biggest contribution is perhaps in how their then world-view has been transplanted to shape our own popular image of regional and national history.

But far from being blindly anti-colonial and anti-West, What Your Teacher Didn’t Tell You is objective in it’s criticism of colonial empire-building, and the many side-effects thereof. And it’s exactly this critical rediscovery and rereading of history that Farish tries to impart on his readers.

Perhaps the most pertinent chapter in helping us understand the socio-political dichotomy of Malaysia today, is the second chapter, entitled “The Lost Tribes of Malaysia”, which interestingly enough, is sub-titled ‘The Construction of Race Politics from Colonial Era to The Present’’. Interesting, because it is in this chapter that we discover how the multitudes of diverse and rich cultures present in the 19th century were gradually distilled to become the Malay/Chinese/Indian/Others demographics we know today.

Reading this chapter, you’ll immediately understand why Walski usually writes the word “Malay” enclosed in quotes.

And Walski is probably not exaggerating when he says that it is exactly this very over-simplified dichotomy that Malaysians today, at large, accept as “naturally” the way things have always been, and should forever be. Reading the book, however, we discover that the historical facts are actually furthest away from this popular notion, that we’ve been programmed to accept as the only possible reality.

Walski's copy of the book, which admittedly has seen better days!

The next chapter, “Of Rajas, Maharajas, Dewarajas and Kerajaan”, is equally relevant to our Malaysia today. For in it, we discover the four thousand year old reason why we remain somewhat feudal in our outlook. At the very least, it finally convinces Walski that old habits are indeed hard to break. Particularly when those habits are ones that we ourselves subconsciously nurture.

From Pigafetta to Panji”, a lecture originally delivered on August 31, 2008, departs from the political somewhat to dispel the idea that certain behaviors deemed reprehensible by our religious authorities and moral guardians, like the “shocking phenomena” of lelaki lembut and tomboy-ism, for instance, are not alien and/or Western-influenced evils. In fact, this interesting foray into the history of Southeast Asian sexuality tells us quite the opposite – that homosexuality and gender-bender scenarios are, in fact, very much part of our “Asian values”, seen from an historical perspective.

The final chapter in the book is a critical analysis of another misunderstood and purposefully misrepresented icon – the legendary Hang Tuah. Farish, in this chapter, reveals to us that the so-called ideal and unquestioning Malay warrior, the image of Tuah that has become a favorite fodder of modern-day exclusivist ethno-nationalists, had a totally different, and Walski dares say, more important, side to him - “Hang Tuah The Pacifist”.

Using Kassim Ahmad’s compilation of Hikayat Hang Tuah as reference (one that is admittedly the most complete and authoritative), Farish walks us through the second part of the Hang Tuah epic – one that is very rarely mentioned.

"Sadly, most Malaysians today have yet to read the Hikayat Hang Tuah in its entirety, and many do not even realise that the most common versions of the story that we know (particularly the more plebeian renderings of the tale dished out to us thanks to the modern miracle of cinema) are incomplete. In fact, most Malaysians remain blissfully unaware of the second part to the Hang Tuah epic, where Tuah the warrior assumes a different role altogether, as the emissary of Melaka to foreign lands."
(from Hang Tuah The Pacifist, pg. 242)

And equally as sad, Walski will have to admit that he, too, is part of that “most Malaysians” demographic (although he does intend to remedy this inclusion in the very near future).

To Walski, the second part of the Hang Tuah epic is important because it gives a totally new perspective to the oft-quoted and over-used “tak kan Melayu hilang di dunia” (‘never will the Malays perish’). This new perspective provides a renewed hope that all is not lost, when it comes to our nation, and that there is historical precedence for positive change. And it is with this important point that Farish closes the chapter, and the book.

Nestled between the fourth chapter (“From Pigafetta to Panji”), and the last, is the bonus chapter mentioned earlier – “The Red-Green Alliance” which unlike the other chapters, did not originate as an Annexe lecture. It is, in fact, a look at what Farish calls ‘the left-leaning years’ of the Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party, which we today know better as PAS.

What Walski found interesting about this bonus chapter is two-fold – first, that PAS today is not the same PAS that was formed in 1951, nor was it the same party in existence in 1956 to 1969, the period which this chapter focuses on, by examining the life of the party’s third president, Dr. Burhanuddin al-Helmy. Second, that it isn’t only the Alliance/BN continuum that can lay exclusive claim to the credit of fighting for an independent Malaya. An important what-if that arises from reading this chapter: this would have been a totally different Malaysia if our British colonialists had been more receptive to the demands of other political entities of the time.

And therein lies the importance of this book: to understand why we are the way we are today, it’s imperative that we know the history of how we came to this point in our collective existence. But not just the official and popular narratives of history, taken at face value – it’s equally important to learn and understand alternative views of history, told either from different perspectives, or through the lens of society at the time – made possible by examining the writing and literature of the time. This analysis and

Only when we fully understand ourselves can we hope to create a framework and road map to a better collective future. Relying solely on the status quo will only take us where the status quo wants us to – which is not always a desirable destination.

It is therefore for these reasons that Walski strongly recommends this book to anyone who cares about this nation, and would like to help build a stronger country for our future generations.

And if these reasons on their own aren’t important enough, and the fact What Your Teacher Didn’t Tell You is a book that’s been beautifully and artistically put together should be an added bonus. Walski will tell you that publisher Amir Muhammad does not exaggerate when he said that it is, by far, “the most gorgeous book we have produced". Credit goes to Liza Manshoor (of Eclectic Design) for making the book a visual masterpiece – the beautiful layout added to making the book not just an important read, but a joyful literary experience on top of that.

Image taken from Writing by Amir, hosting by PhotobucketPages 152/153 of the book - image taken from Writing by Amir

As another added bonus (assuming you’re still not sold on the book), law professor Azmi Sharom (another hip Malaysian academician, whose bi-weekly column Brave New World is published by The Star) contributes a preface piece, about the important role of the academician – a role that is unfortunately very much undervalued in our current socio-political climate.

Perhaps the only very minor fault that Walski could find with What Your Teacher Didn’t Tell You is that the footnotes, liberally found throughout the book, can get a tad distracting. That said, these footnotes are a necessary distraction, providing insightful perspectives and sources for further reading. A friend of Walski’s did remark, though, that he thought the book read a bit too much like a history textbook.

A history textbook it may be, but it’s like no other textbook you’ll ever find. The engaging and eye-opening content, coupled with the aesthetically pleasing sepia-toned historical imagery artistically chosen to accompany the worthwhile text, plus the unique thick-cut paper used, making sure that the meaty text physically feels meaty, all come together to make Farish A. Noor’s What Your Teacher Didn’t Tell You a must-read for 2010.

~ ~ o O 0 O o ~~

Walski's Technical Publishing Additional Information Footnote: Walski had the opportunity to briefly converse with Amir Muhammad (founder of Matahari Books, the publisher) on Twitter the other day. He mentioned that What Your Teacher Didn’t Tell You is already in it’s FOURTH edition (as of April 2010), and is a certified best-seller. That is indeed heartening to note, since Walski personally feels that this is a very important read for all Malaysians, no matter where you may be.

You can find this book in all major bookstores around the country and in Singapore, and also online, through Amazon.com. And just in case you’re wondering about Volume 2, Amir said that it would be published sometime in December this year, God-willing.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Click here for the full post......